• Do you think the assassination attempt was “allowed” to happen?

I am not sure exactly what you mean by “allowed”. If you mean the Secret Service was behind it…I have no reliable and verified evidence or knowledge that is the case. And, I haven’t heard anyone who has any valid and reliable information that they were.

The sheer number of SS agents that would be in the loop on such a plot would be pretty large. And that would tell me that there is a high likelihood that someone would object and potentially whistleblow. Also, I can’t imagine all those that would have to be involved could collectively keep their mouths shut. But that does open up another train of thought.

According to the laws of logic…

Based on the actions/reactions of the SS agents on scene it is obvious that the entire operation was a failure from the beginning. Meaning, the shooter’s building wasn’t cleared and then secured. As people saw the shooter climbing the building and getting into position they reported it to law enforcement…and law enforcement didn’t take action to stop him. At least 2 SS snipers were looking in his exact direction for 3 – 4 minutes prior to the shooter opening fire and took no action until the shooter got off 4 – 8 rounds.

Once Trump was shot and down it should not have taken the SS more than 60 seconds at most to be moving him into the armored car…they took much much longer than that. The whole idea of numerous agents surrounding a protectee is to provide a human shield against the protectee being shot again, whether by the original shooter or additional shooters. If you look at the SS agents as they are moving Trump they leave Trump wide open for a second shooter to score direct hits center mass or head shots. That should never ever have happened by anyone even remotely qualified to be executive protection detail members.

I’ve already mentioned the female agent who played with her sunglasses multiple times while Trump was being moved. Of course she should have, they were probably multi-hundred dollar Oakly’s! Gotta maintain that cool SS look, right? What was really cute was another female SS agent at the armored vehicle as Trump was being placed inside, she is trying to holster her weapon. Ah, about 12 tries later she gave up and went back into a bad-ass low ready position…looking dazed and confused. Muscle memory should have gotten her weapon holstered the first time. That tells me she is seriously deficient in training. And that is verified by ALL the SS agents actions trying to move Trump…it was a clown show.

So what does logic have to do with it? Simple…you implied that the SS might have allowed it to happen. I provided logical information that probably wasn’t the case. If SS agents didn’t allow it to happen is then true, then the opposing facts are true…the SS was entirely incompetent in that operation. Both can’t be true…unless of course the incompetence was feigned to allow all of the failures to line up and result is catastrophe. But that would oppose the theory of Occam’s Razor.

This is called the Swiss Cheese model of event/accident causation, it is a model used in risk analysis and risk management (a.k.a. “Cumulative Act Effect”). Basically all the failures line up and create the catastrophic failure effect. Meaning no person, or not enough persons, takes action to prevent the catastrophic failure event/accident. You can read more about this concept and methodology < click here >

As for the female agents…before someone goes off on me…let me give you more ammunition. If you watch the videos you can see that the female agents are all but useless when trying to shield Trump…they aren’t large enough and never in a useful position. As Trump is being moved the female agents appear “lost”. As they are putting Trump into the vehicle the female agents once again just kinda wander around unable to perform any meaningful actions. And here is the great thing about that…the SS has a goal that by 2030 30% of all protective field agents are designated to be female. Yeah, let’s not go for the best of qualified folks to be agents, oh no…let’s identify new agents simply based upon gender as a qualification. Then you wonder why the SS has lost credibility and respect and can longer adequately perform their duties…for decades.

• What is the strangest part of all this?

That is a fantastic question, thank you! Oddly for me it really is disassociated directly from the shooting itself. In my last article “How is this to blame on Biden?” I relayed the information when Biden put the “bullseye” on Trump. That statement was made during a private phone conference with multiple Democrat Party mega-donors. So his “bullseye” statement is bad enough…sounds like ordering a hit. But, what I find most interesting…who leaked that information and why?

Wouldn’t you think that all those on the phone call were party loyalists who are big-time donors, and/or Biden staff. And wouldn’t they then want to protect Biden from that kind of legal and publicity damning spot-light? So why was the info leaked, eh? Oh, come on…you know why.

• The FBI was investigating the shooting, why is the DHS now investigating as well?

The FBI is normally the lead agency (Agency Having Jurisdiction) when it comes to these matters of current and former federal employees/politicians. The DHS is normally the Agency Having Jurisdiction when it comes to domestic terrorism events.

A case could be made that this is just inter-agency rivalry and agencies flexing their muscles to maintain their territory. Or, a case could be made that now that this is branded an act of domestic terrorism ANY and ALL information that is gathered is now classified at the highest standards. And that means it more than likely doesn’t get released…ever.

How convenient, eh?

Related Articles:

• Attempted assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #1
• Attempted Assassination of Trump: How is this to blame on Biden?
• Attempted assassination of Trump…first info and questions
• Trump Assassination Attempt
• Situational Awareness: Part 6 – Dig It !
• Out-Of-The-Loop

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p