Can the US be saved…Why not?

  • In a previous post you were asked ‘Can the US be saved?’ I read your answer. It was incomplete. Why not?

There are three major insurmountable obstacles to America being saved.

#1 – Debt. Never in the history of the world has any empire using fiat currency and implementing modern monetary theory (MMT) ever been “saved”…they have ALL fallen. Just to be clear, the US is an “empire” by definition. The debt the US has accumulated cannot be sustained, which is modern monetary theory. Debt will crash the US Empire, that is an indisputable fact, and proven by thousands of years of history…the US will be no different.

#2 – The invasion of illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants now make up approximately 15% of the population of the US. The extreme danger involved is the majority of the illegals are criminals before they cross our border, and all are criminals for crossing our border illegally. The chaos, crime, and financial impact cannot be overcome. It is past the tipping point, it is now on an exponential curve to destruction. And no, US citizens do not have the stomach to deport all of the illegals. Hell, we don’t have the stomach to depart just all the harden criminal illegals.

#3 – Political Parties. George Washington warned us against political parties, specifically a 2-party system, just over 200 years ago. And he was exactly right! The problem is, as Washington pointed out, a political party is simply interested in getting into, and staying in, power. In the US we are stuck in a death spiral with the Democrats and Republicans. Neither party does a damn thing to actually improve the country as per the Constitution…as in rights, freedoms, and liberties. Both parties are war-mongering, both parties can’t control their spending, both parties are tied into the military-industrial complex, both parties are corrupt….both parties are destroying our country. And that is a simple, indisputable fact. So, as long as we are stuck with, and vote within, a 2-party system there is no saving the US from destruction.

There is a fourth reason out there, vague to be sure…kinda lurking in the shadows. It is easy to see, hard to adequately describe, and vehemently debated when brought up. The dark horse to America not being able to be saved is the accelerating rise of authoritarianism in the US. And it is coming from not just from the deepstate, but also from both parties. And remember this…in the entire history of the world, in the totality of mankind, authoritarians have never given up power willingly.

FYI…”Empire” is described as being a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority. The US covers a huge territory consisting of political units such as states (50), territories (11), and one district. The “single sovereign authority” is the federal government. So the US is by definition an “empire”.


Articles in this Series –
Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…




 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Can the US be saved?

  • Can the US be saved?

Well, that depends. Why? Because it is a relative question. Relative to “saved” to what point in time, and how do you described “saved”.

So I would describe “saved” meaning restoring rights, liberties, and freedoms back to the “we the people”. What “rights, liberties, and freedoms” am I talking about? The ones outlined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, along with the intentions of the Founding Fathers. Basically moving power back to the people and away from government…as the Founders envisioned.

As to what point in time…compared to when I was a kid, the US is long lost…and I mean by a long shot. Compared to pre-9/11 the country is already lost as well. Who do you see that could take the reins of government and return it to its Constitutional foundation?

As far as I can see…no one. Maybe you think differently but I can’t see a single person that has a desire to restore the Constitution and return the government to its very restricted and limited place. Do you see anyone?

And even if you could name one…do you think the deep state, the bureaucrats, the elites, the globalists, or the rich would allow them to do that? Of course not, they aren’t going to give up their power at all…not a single one of them. So no one has a chance to restore even if someone had the desire.

So let’s ask the question again…Can the US be saved? Yes.

However, there is only a single way that the US can be saved in any definition of the word. And that is through divine intervention…period.

So now ask the questions…Could it happen vs will it happen? And if it would happen…Why?


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message…




 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Why haven’t you written about the ATF killing Malinowski?

  • Why haven’t you written about the ATF killing Malinowski?

Should I have to? It’s pretty clear what happened and why. Well, to anyone who understands the big picture…as well as the details.

Let’s talk about this in a realistic, honest, clear, and logical manner. No government propaganda and no conspiracy theory tinfoil hat hooey. Just talk about facts based on information that is current and pretty well documented.

Here is what we know about Bryan Malinowski:

  1. Malinowski was a public official, well-known, well-respected, high-profile member of the community with no criminal record of any kind.
  2. He was suspected by the ATF of selling 150 +/- guns over an approximately 3-year period.
  3. Allegedly, six of those guns were suspected of being used in a crime by the person he sold them to.
  4. 3 – 5 of the “crimes” were marijuana possession.
  5. Allegedly, three of those gun sales were to undercover law enforcement officers.
  6. None of the sales were identified as actually being “illegal”.
  7. Allegedly, paperwork on some (number unknown) of the guns that were sold were initially identified by Malinowski for personal use and not for resale. Note: There is nothing under current law that prevents a person from changing their mind and later selling a gun.

The law covering #7 states “…purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of Federal law.” Since Malinowski had a well-paying job (livelihood) providing a comfortable living there is no violation since he wasn’t doing it for “livelihood” and there is no indication that he made a “profit” on any sale. Hence, no violation was committed and none documented by ATF on the search warrant or any other court document…according to the law.

Here’s what we know about the search warrant:

  • There was no description of any crime committed by Malinowski only a suspicion of potential crime(s).
  • The “warrant” was to search for evidence since the ATF didn’t have sufficient evidence to show any criminal activity had already been committed.
  • There was no “arrest” warrant which means they had no evidence to even indicate a reasonable suspicion that Malinowski had actually committed a crime.
  • It was executed before dawn when the ATF knew Malinowski would be asleep.
  • There is no evidence whatsoever that the ATF SWAT team announced their presence; making this a “no-knock” warrant.

So here are the questions:

  • If the ATF considered Malinowski a criminal and selling guns illegally, why was there no arrest warrant for criminal activity?
  • If this was only a search warrant why not have it executed during the day, with regular agents announcing themselves and then working through the search with Malinowski? You know, simply ask him about the sales and did he have paperwork to back up the sales…reasonable actions to a normal and reasonable person.
  • Why the necessity of a 20 – 40 man highly armed military operation in a civilian neighborhood?
  • If a “no-knock” warrant was considered vital, why? Was Malinowski that extremely dangerous? There is ZERO evidence that this was the case.
  • If he was that dangerous, why was there no arrest warrant as well?
  • Why has no ATF video released showing the raid?
  • Why did the ATF agents disable the home’s video camera prior to breaking through the door?
  • Has the ATF identified the agent shot and confirmed he was shot by Malinowski or “friendly fire”?
  • How did the ATF personnel manage to shoot him directly in the head during a supposed “gunfight”? Actually, how many times was Malinowski shot and where?

So here are a couple of thoughts:

  • Executing a pre-dawn military operation while people are still asleep is to gain maximum surprise making it far easier to kill the enemy. That is a well-known military tactic, especially for US special forces.
  • The ATF knew Malinowski would be asleep.
  • The ATF knows that any normal person who owns guns would have one ready to defend their home and family against break-ins or home invasions.
  • The ATF knew Malinowski would defend his home and family against home invasions.

And finally let’s touch on a couple of issues:

  • Brian Malinowski had not been charged with any crime, no arrest warrant had been issued.
  • There is no evidence that any gun sale was illegal, only alleged, and without any evidence to support the allegation.
  • There is no indication whatsoever that Malinowski was prone to violence, had ever committed any violence, or would commit any violence.
  • The laws that the ATF were attempting to gather evidence on from Malinowski are all violating the Second Amendment since the amendment states “…shall not be infringed.” There is no wording that allows for excluding buying and/or selling of arms in the amendment. The US Constitution is a negative rights constitution, meaning that if the right isn’t stated, then the government doesn’t have it. So there is NO authorization in the US Constitution for the federal government to infringe on a citizens gun rights.
  • The US Constitution does not authorize any agency such as the ATF. Therefore, the ATF is, in and of itself, an unconstitutional government agency with no right to even exist.

So let’s carry this out logically, pure and simple, no bullshit involved:

  • The US Constitution doesn’t allow for laws to be written infringing on a citizen’s gun rights. So the law(s) Malinowski supposedly violated are invalid.
  • The judge that authorized the no-knock raid violated Malinowski’s 4th Amendment rights. So the warrant was illegally authorized.
  • The agency (ATF) that conducted the raid is not a legally established agency under the US Constitution.

So, if the anti-gun law isn’t Constitutional, and if the people carrying out the raid aren’t legally representing the US government, and the warrant was issued contrary to the 4th Amendment…then who is at fault for Malinowski being dead?

But, let’s look at this in an entirely different light for just a moment.

It is clear, proof positive, that the US federal government is anti-gun; absolutely all in on that. All governments that are anti-gun are authoritarian in nature. All authoritarian governments fear losing power over their citizens. Governments’ primary means of controlling citizens is by fear…fear of violating the law, fear of being fined, fear of being put in prison, fear of being killed, even fear of just being spotlighted by the government.

So why would the ATF kill Malinowski? Well to answer that one, consider…

Why did the FBI kill Craig Deleeuw Robertson, an invalid, a handicapped senior citizen with no criminal record and no ability to carry out any kind of violent crime?

Why did the ATF/FBI kill Randy Weaver’s wife and child?

Why did the ATF/FBI burn nearly 80 people alive in Waco?

Amazingly, in every situation the ATF/FBI always maintains that the person/people targeted fired first. And yet, they have failed to ever provide proof of such, or failed to show that people were simply defending themselves against armed attackers who were unknown and unidentified?

Would it be realistic to say that we have some very psychotic and dangerous…potentially evil/demonic…killers working for the FBI and ATF?

If not, then why raid a person’s home with a no-knock warrant, by complete surprise, military-style raids by lots of heavily armed men who readily and willingly kill US citizens at the drop of a hat?

I guess then you might have a lot of reason to pose this question…

Is this what happens when you have an authoritarian federal government create agencies that are not authorized in the Constitution trying enforce laws that are in direct violation of that same Constitution?

Maybe all this about messaging? Ever read the book, or see the movie, “1984”? Maybe the answer to all of this can be found there.

Please pray! Pray for softened hearts and open minds. Pray for kindness and compassion. Pray for justice and mercy. Pray for calm. Pray for peace.


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

FISA = Traitors ?

  • Do you think passing FISA is an act of treason?

Well, FISA is all about by-passing (ignoring) the Constitution regarding spying on US citizens. Don’t be fooled by its name Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. Congress has exposed the fact that US law enforcement agencies, primarily the FBI, have used FISA hundreds of thousands of times to illegally spy on US citizens. And that is not some wild-eyed speculation or conspiracy theory…it is 100% fact with the evidence to prove it to be true and it was shown in Congressional hearings.

FISA is everything that is in direct opposition of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Our Founding Fathers would speak out against it with every fiber of their soul. And that is exactly why the US federal government loves it! FISA somehow justifies the unconstitutional actions of US federal law enforcement agencies…an authoritarian’s dream come true.

So you have federal law enforcement agencies, who are not authorized by the Constitution, using laws that are not only not authorized by the Constitution, they are in direct opposition to the Constitution. Hummmm…

So you have to ask yourself, what is the “traitor” status of those who wrote the law, voted for the law, and use the law?

Once again, for me, knowing the answer to that question helps clearly define who is on what side of the line in the US when it comes to good vs evil and liberty vs authoritarianism. Yup, pretty damn clear!

Remember, it was FISA that was used to start the coup against Trump.


Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message…




 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Iran vs Israel – Update

There are a number of issues I want to briefly touch on. Only briefly? Yup! I know you are, or can be, overwhelmed with information, speculation, and sensationalism regarding the Iranian attack on Israel…I don’t want to be part of that.

First – While still being unverifiable, the number of drones and missiles fired at Israel by Iran now appears to be approximately 300. Remember, this number has not been confirmed and will probably never be verified.

Second – Contrary to some wild-eyed click-bait reporting…NO Israeli airbase was destroyed. It was attacked and there was some very minor and superficial damage.

Third – I wanted to talk about this earlier but I didn’t feel it was sufficiently verified, but now I feel it is noteworthy and reliable enough to mention. It appears now that the US knew about the pending attack by Iran on Israel. And the US didn’t tell Iran to not attack. And the only US response to Iran was it was not involved and should not be targeted. The one thing I am still up in the air about is…Did the US notify Israel about the impending attack? There is information that can go both ways on that one. I will keep you updated. Remember, somehow the US didn’t know about the October 7th attack on Israel either…uh huh, right.

Fourth – There are some folks calling this Iranian attack “sophisticated”. Nothing could be further from the truth. Iran launched slow, easily tracked drones that took hours to reach Israel. And they were easy to shoot down. The cruise missiles Iran used were several generations of technology old. Again, easily tracked and shot down. The ballistic missiles were also older technology that presented no serious threat to Israel. Think about it…more Hamas rockets hit Israel during that same time period than anything Iran shot at Israel on Saturday. And the drones and missises were launched in waves vs all at once. Waves of incoming are much easier to deal with and pose little threat to overwhelming air defenses. There was absolutely nothing sophisticated about the attack…it was rather primitive actually. Gee, I wonder why that was?

Lastly – Remember Iran’s attack on Israel on Saturday was in response to what Iran says was an Israeli attack/strike on the Iranian consulate in Damascus, Syria earlier this month where Iranian official(s) were killed. While Israel has not claimed responsibility, there is strong evidence indicating that is actually the case. If so, then Israel actually committed an act of war against both Iran and Syria. So, if true, Iran would have been completely justified in responding to that Israeli act of war by attacking Israel as a response. Israel, like the US, has a long history/tradition of committing these kinds of attacks killing government officials on foreign soil so I tend to believe this to be the case.

Please remember…those calling for Israel to strike back militarily against Iran only wish to see the body count rise, more death and destruction. And why do you think they want that? Think about why folks want to see this escalate.


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Iran’s attack on Israel – After Action Report

Yesterday Iran attacked Israel…and failed miserably. Iran was unable to accomplish any notable damage of significance. The only serious injury was a young child that was hit by shrapnel from an Iron Dome interceptor missile. Reportedly an Israeli airbase was hit but with little damage and no serious injuries. Iran failed in any military objective…except…

If I was Iranian military leadership and conducting an After Action Report (AAR) I would be embarrassed more than anything…unless…

From strictly a military perspective, last year’s October attack on Israel by Hamas was thousands of times more effective. But what does that have to do with yesterday’s drone and missile attack? Everything!

There is a lesson learned here for Iran…conventional warfare tactics won’t work against Israel.

Iran fired over 100 missiles and drones at Israel, including ballistic missiles. Not a single one made any real impact on any military or civilian target. Further, it showcased two things; 1) Israeli Iron Dome and Air Force can very effectively defend against such an attack, 2) It showed that countries can and will work together to defend Israel (i.e. Jordan and the US).

I am estimating that Iran spent somewhere in the neighborhood of $10,000,000 dollars yesterday in the attack. But it was a minimal price to pay for the lesson that they learned. And the $10,000,000 was probably reimbursed by either Obama or Biden’s cash payments over the last 15 years.

So what is next?

If Israel responds as history predicts and rhetoric sounds like at this point…Israel will strike out at Iran directly or at their proxies; maybe both. But they don’t need to.

Israel humiliated Iran yesterday…period. Everyone around the world, with any brain cells, can look at this attack as a complete and total failure on the part of Iran. It diminishes Iran’s political, diplomatic, and military power exponentially. It shows that they are a second rate military power (at best) with no ability to go head-to-head with Israel’s military. Humiliating for Iran!

If I was Israel I would play the diplomatic side of this…the “high road”. I would release a couple well-worded statements subtly insulting Iran’s capabilities, their weakness, their leadership, and showing Iran to be a bully that was disposed of quite easily.

At this point there is no effectual reason to strike back at Iran militarily. Israel has shown it can’t be bullied by a second rate military power…a tiger with no teeth or claws. If I was Israel I would concentrate on preparing to defend against another October 7th type attack…or some other unconventional attack.

Now here is the important part of all of this…

Beware of those calling for an attack against Iran, especially a joint operation.

This is the desire of ‘hawks’, ‘war-mongers’, those in the world’s military-industrial complex that would profit by yet another war in the world, or those simply confused in the difference between war and peace. Those calling for a military response strike against Iran only want to see destruction and death…they do NOT want peace in the world.

And ask the question, “Why don’t they want peace?

Think that one through for a while and you will see how the world is divided right now.

While your at it ask another question, “Do you honestly think that Iran thought they could get many, if any, of their drones and missiles through Israel’s defenses? So what might have been Iran’s real objective from that attack?


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.