Feedback : Stop writing about Trump and the war!

AH Trimble Feedback and Comments

From: anonymous

RE: Feedback : A lot of Christians have spoken…

Why are you writing so much about the war and Trump? Stop it! I want to here about prepping.


Sounds as if you and ‘yardmaster’ have been talking…or you are one in the same. Yardmaster isn’t liking my writing about Trump and the war either. But, there are three points I want to make to explain why I am writing about them…

1 – Without trying to sound rude or insulting…if you don’t like what I am writing about, then don’t read it. I make it pretty clear what the subject of the post is…don’t read what you don’t want to hear about. Also, I have moved most of the actual Trump/War “sitrep” kinda articles to a “Patriot” category and in PDF format. That means you have plenty of advance warning that the article (my opinion based on facts, stats, & evidence) is a current event opinion piece. And then to read it you have to actually download the article. Again, if you don’t want to read about my opinions of the war and Trump…then don’t download the PDF file.

2 – The reason I am writing so much about the war is because it has a direct impact on preppers. It impacts how much it costs to buy whatever you need, so setting proper priorities is important. Also, the war is escalating and is showing evidence that it could well turn into a world war…the ultimate “grid-down” event. I am trying to keep people informed of what I see happening so folks can make informed decisions…if they trust and believe what I am saying. I don’t want people to be blindsided like they were in the 1930’s.

3 – Let me be clear…I believe that the facts clearly show that Trump is growing increasingly erratic, unhinged, vicious, hateful, and very dangerous as President. He took us to war for no valid or logical reason, he is costing the world trillions of dollars, he is killing thousands of people (4000 – 6000 over all involved countries) and mostly civilians, he has attacked the Pope, insulted Christians, impersonated Jesus Christ, and is assisting Israel in their genocide against other countries/people. There is no reasonable person that could look at all of that and think he is a mentally stable person. With his mental health growing more unstable and more dangerous…we have to be aware, we have to prepare, and we have to pray for him…and pray earnestly for our country. Please pray for President Trump if you are a believer.

Now, since you and yardmaster both have spoken up that means there must be others. So I will try and be more diligent in making sure the current events opinion articles are in the “Patriot” category.

Finally, rather than just not liking my posting of current event articles…I would really like to hear what you have to say…I would like to hear your opinion. And I am sure I am not the only one. Please consider that.


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : A lot of Christians have spoken…

FROM: Russ

RE: A lot of Christians have spoken…

Russ writes: I was extremely disappointed when I first saw that cartoonish image.
Unfortunately, Donald Trump’s ego appears to have no limit.
There are a number of people who believe that he is beginning to suffer from dementia, forgetting important things.
He certainly has become very erratic.
First was “Sleepy Joe.”
Now, we have “Delusional Donald.”
I am starting to have great concern about where all of this will end.


When I first saw that picture of Trump portraying himself as Christ I almost couldn’t believe it. I mean someone actually portraying themselves as Jesus???

Then I realized that it fit his personality perfectly…it is the true Donald.

I know a couple of hard-right MAGA said it was only meant to be a joke. Ah, no. No one in their right mind who is a Christian would do such a thing…joke or not. And that is the key…” No one in their right mind…” Trump is not in his right mind…if he ever had one. I think he is really good at “masking”…until the last year or so.

You are absolutely spot on about his acting erratic.

A major incident of his was when he posted a picture of himself as Pope. That would tend to insult 1.4 BILLION Christians/Catholics. Why would he do such a thing? Then he literally goes to war with the Pope saying rude, insulting and outrageous things about him.

As if that isn’t good enough…Trump then posts a picture of himself as Jesus Christ. That would be, should be, insulting to another 1 BILLION Christians.

What is he trying to accomplish by doing such things? A couple of folks have hinted he is trying to start a religious war. Think about it…Trump ordered the killing of Shia Islam’s leader; Supreme Leader / Grand Ayatollah Khamenei. Khamenei…was kinda like a “Pope” in Islam…would tend to piss off 250million Shia Muslims. I wonder how they felt about the US shoving a missile down his throat. But, to make sure that Trump’s war did it right, when they bombed Khamenei they also killed a daughter, a grandchild, a son-in-law, and a daughter-in-law. Hey, do we know how to kill innocent civilians or what!! And then in the process make 250million people mad at us…Go Crusades!!

Back to my point…Trump has killed an Islamic leader, insulted Catholics, went to war with the Pope, then insulted all Christians. Huh…yeah…maybe he is trying to start a religious war…or maybe he just doesn’t like religion period. That would count as delusional for anyone, especially a politician.

As to where this ends…well, I believe it ends in World War 3…if we aren’t already there in the early stages. We do know for sure that it tanks the US economy because it already has. We also know it further polarizes Americans because it already has.

Back to the whole religion thing…I did some research on Trump…there is a pattern of controversy involving religious leaders and religious symbols and I found he often uses confrontational language toward religious figures who criticize him. Lately, he has been posting religious imagery that many believers find offensive. And when you look into the background of Hegseth…well, it gets interesting…

Intentionally starting a religious war? Nah, I don’t think so. I just think Trump has become “Delusional Donald” like Russ suggested.

Although…Turkey just recently used pretty harsh rhetoric to threaten Israel because of Israel’s genocide in Gaza and Lebanon. No military action on the part of Turkey against Israel has occurred…yet. And Turkey’s military is no powder-puff outfit. Short-term Israel would hurt Turkey…long-term Turkey could overcome and beat Israel. But Turkey is a NATO member. Article 5 would come into play if Israel struck Turkey…and all NATO countries would be obligated to come to their defense and fight against Israel. That would be interesting to say the least! Obviously that would be the end of NATO.

Recapping…

  • Jews (Israel) killing Muslims & Christians (Gaza & Lebanon)
  • Christians (USA) killing Muslims (Iran, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, & Yeman) & Christians (Lebanon, Iran, & Syria)
  • Muslims (Iran & proxies) killing Jews (Israel) & Christians (USA)
  • Shia Muslims (Iran & proxies) killing Sunni Muslims (Iraq, Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Kuwait, Oman, & Jordan)

Very odd…almost absurd…regarding who’s killing who. Almost sounds like the opening days of World War 3…a religious war.

 


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Trump’s Oath & Bible Controversy

FROM: inventivebuttery720185c096

RE: I completely missed it !

I completely understand what you are saying and tend to agree with you about a lot. I personally don’t like Trump and didn’t vote for him. I do agree with some of what he is trying to do but not all.
However, if you remember the inauguration at that precise moment, there is a little bit of confusion as he starts without Melanie being there with the Bibles. It was a quick transition and I don’t think she had time to get up there before he started. I personally think it was an oversight and not deliberate at all. I believe most people can see this if they take a closer look. Tucker could be taking this idea of Trump purposefully not putting his hand on the Bibles out of context of what was really happening. I remember thinking at the time it happened that it was strange that Chief Justice Roberts started without her being at Trump’s side.


Glad to hear we are mostly on the same page 😉

I can’t stand Trump the “man”, I don’t see a single quality as a person or leader that I admire. As a President…well, I think he is one of the worse, if not the worse, in the last 100 years. Besides him wrecking the economy, he has gotten us into a war we will not will. I will give him credit, it appears he has secured the southern border and has gotten rid of some bad guy criminal illegal aliens. Too bad so many US citizens got injured and killed in the process.

As for the ceremony…

There was some confusion at the start of the “oath”…however, Melania got there before Trump started reciting but after Roberts started speaking. Trump, being the man that he is and if he had wanted to, he would have delayed Roberts till Melania got there…or put his hand on the Bible after she got there and before he started reciting the oath…in my opinion.

What I find interesting…he doesn’t even look for Melania and/or the Bibles while taking his position for the oath. If he had any respect for the Bibles or his wife…don’t you think he would have looked for her…or at least acknowledged her when she stepped up beside him?

If he was a meek man I could see him being overwhelmed by the whole event and lose track of what was happening…but Trump is anything but meek and humble…and it was his second time doing this.

While we agree on a lot…we ain’t gonna agree on this one. I think Trump could have cared less about Melania being there. And if he cared about God and the importance of the Bible in regards to the oath…he would not have sworn the oath without them. Then again…what the heck do I know!


Related Article –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Show me the numbers !

For those who don’t believe reality…well, here are the numbers…

Things really aren’t looking good. What are you doing to prepare?

Source: Alexa Lisitza @ Buzzfeed via polling data.

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

 

Feedback : Hegelian Dialectic…

AH Trimble Feedback and Comments

An interesting piece of feedback from a website regular…

RE: Q & A : Hegelian Dialectic…


  • AH,

Your response to yardmaster’s query is definitely a part of being prepared. It is a part of what I view as the multi-step process of becoming prepared.

This has four elements:

  1. You must be spiritually prepared before anything else. Be at one with your Creator and Savior.
  2. Be mentally prepared so that you know that you can not only survive but also even thrive.
  3. Be prepared by gaining all the necessary knowledge that you see you will need to be prepared. (This will be an ongoing process)
  4. Once you have done the above, you can then go and get all of the necessary things that you will then know that you will need. (A lot of people just buy “stuff,” not knowing if it is really needed and even put you in danger, let alone how to use it.)

The concept of situational awareness and to then be familiar with just what the Hegelian Dialect is, is definitely part of the knowledge portion of being prepared. You must know just what the enemy is, whether it be an issue of food, water or shelter or attack in some form or even an issue of dealing with authorities (misdirection or false flags, etc. – history is full of such examples) that may be misleading you.

We are entering an incredibly complex period of time, full of many potential disasters and confrontations. Being forewarned by doing your own due diligence to understand just what you need to prepare for will definitely make you forearmed. 


Interesting and informative knowledge…wisdom. Please read, listen, and hear what he is saying.


Related Articles –

 

 

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Odd… #2

AH Trimble Feedback and CommentsI wrote an article on the 29th < This must stop… > condemning the violence, the attacks on law enforcement, the interference of ICE to do their job, the destruction, and the killings, etc. And apparently some folks didn’t like me calling for a stop to it. I find that odd, disturbingly so. I was calling for a stop to the violence and hatred. I said if it didn’t stop we might end up in a very dark and ugly place. I thought that was a reasonable call to action…stop the violence and hatred.

I received replies/comments from two folks, one of which I know, the other I don’t. It appears to me one is very radically on the pro-violence and far-right of the issue, clearly so. The other response was more of a sharing of another person’s opinion. I responded to their replies. After I did so I thought it through and I think we have hit political obstacle…maybe a dead end to this issue altogether. But for sure…an issue where few are willing to drop bias and change their minds or see reality for what it is vs perception.

So here is what I am going to do…I am going to make two separate posts regarding their views/comments and my replies. I think it prudent to share both sides, different views on this situation. But then I will call the issue closed. Why? Because it is more polarizing than any other issue that I have seen in a very long time. And should the polarization continue at this trajectory all that is needed would be an event, an incident, that would be the ignition point to a far darker time in America than any reasonable person wants.

This is the second in the posting of the feedback and replies. < click here to read the first “feedback” >

Posted by MamaGrizzly:

Eric Schwalm

“As a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops—both hunting insurgents and trying to separate them from sympathetic populations—I’ve seen organized resistance up close. From Anbar to Helmand, the pattern is familiar: spotters, cutouts, dead drops (or modern equivalents), disciplined comms, role specialization, and a willingness to absorb casualties while bleeding the stronger force slowly.

What’s unfolding in Minneapolis right now isn’t “protest.” It’s low-level insurgency infrastructure, built by people who’ve clearly studied the playbook.

Signal groups at 1,000-member cap per zone. Dedicated roles: mobile chasers, plate checkers logging vehicle data into shared databases, 24/7 dispatch nodes vectoring assets, SALUTE-style reporting (Size, Activity, Location, Unit, Time, Equipment) on suspected federal vehicles. Daily chat rotations and timed deletions to frustrate forensic recovery. Vetting processes for new joiners. Mutual aid from sympathetic locals (teachers providing cover, possible PD tip-offs on license plate lookups). Home-base coordination points. Rapid escalation from observation to physical obstruction—or worse.

This isn’t spontaneous outrage. This is C2 (command and control) with redundancy, OPSEC hygiene, and task organization that would make a SF team sergeant nod in recognition. Replace “ICE agents” with “occupying coalition forces” and the structure maps almost 1:1 to early-stage urban cells we hunted in the mid-2000s.

The most sobering part? It’s domestic. Funded, trained (somewhere), and directed by people who live in the same country they’re trying to paralyze law enforcement in. When your own citizens build and operate this level of parallel intelligence and rapid-response network against federal officers—complete with doxxing, vehicle pursuits, and harassment that’s already turned lethal—you’re no longer dealing with civil disobedience. You’re facing a distributed resistance that’s learned the lessons of successful insurgencies: stay below the kinetic threshold most of the time, force over-reaction when possible, maintain popular support through narrative, and never present a single center of gravity.

I spent years training partner forces to dismantle exactly this kind of apparatus. Now pieces of it are standing up in American cities, enabled by elements of local government and civil society. That should keep every thinking American awake at night.

Not because I want escalation. But because history shows these things don’t de-escalate on their own once the infrastructure exists and the cadre believe they’re winning the information war.

We either recognize what we’re actually looking at—or we pretend it’s still just “activism” until the structures harden and spread.

Your call, America. But from where I sit, this isn’t January 2026 politics anymore. It’s phase one of something we’ve spent decades trying to keep off our own soil.

My reply:

Interesting…couple thoughts regarding this man’s opinion piece:

#1 – I looked into Eric Schwalm (claiming Retired Green Beret (CW4)) and I found this: “A post attributed to “Eric Schwalm” on the social platform captured in the reporting explicitly identifies the poster as “a former Special Forces Warrant Officer with multiple rotations running counterinsurgency ops” and applies that experience to analyze unrest in Minneapolis, describing patterns the author says mirror Anbar and Helmand operations. That text is a primary source for the claim but, within the set of documents provided for this analysis, stands alone — there is no accompanying military service record, biography, or official confirmation attached to the account in these materials.”
I could find nothing that confirmed that Schwalm was who he says he is. The only Eric Schwalm came back as an employee at a consulting firm at Bain & Company. With no military service record. Eric Schwalm may be who he says he is but no one online could confirm he is who he says he is.

I did find a person using his name on “X”. Nothing on his account confirmed who he says he is, but he claims SOF and military background. I read a bunch of his posts…whoa. This guy is seriously jacked on violence. He is gun-ho about everything military…except when he is criticizing all the military bigwigs who don’t like Trump…then it is a conspiracy. But again, I can find nothing online that confirms who he claims to be.

#2 – This article only represents what his opinion is…nothing more. I’ve read multiple articles and watched multiple videos lately of veterans who have condemned DHS & ICE and the broader Trump administration on their tactics. So who do you want to listen to and who do you want to believe? It is all opinion…on both sides of the issue…our choice.

#3 – There have been multiple former ICE agents and former DHS employees who have criticized what is going on currently in MN. An FBI agent resigned in protest over the FBI investigation handling of the shooting of Renee Good. So do we believe them since they have far more experience and credibility regarding MN than a vet who is not involved in MN, has no training as an FBI agent, has no training or experience as ICE or DHS, and has no experience with civilians in the US?

#4 – I don’t know about anyone else but I don’t need to have someone I don’t know tell me what I should think about ICE & MN. Especially people who are not using the actual definition of “insurgency” and other terms or even actual facts. I believe what I believe based on my own research and my own viewing and my own analysis of video…and listening to those folks whom I trust. I for sure put zero credibility in people’s version of events when they are on either the radical left or radical right. Yeah, basically meaning I can think for myself using valid and reliable information and evidence.

#5 – Confirmation bias is a damning thing. But in all things political now it seems to rule the day…unfortunately. That is why I am not part of the right nor part of the left…I will look at individual issues and make my opinion based on what I figure out…not on political ideology or bias. And I try very hard to temper all of my opinions with Christ’s teachings.

#6 – Back during my Vietnam War era days when I was in the military handling classified intelligence I remember the group called “Vietnam Veterans Against the War”. Republicans hated them, “patriots” despised them, most of the public thought they were cowards and pinkos. Yeah, problem…they were right…so were all the other protestors who were against the war. A lot of the those protestors were killed for standing up for what they believed…including May 1970 when there were 13 casualties, all kids, shot by National Guard troops at Kent State. It took a couple of decades but it turned out all those protestors were right…the Vietnam War was wrong…and almost 60,000 military lives were wasted. So just because a group protests doesn’t mean they are wrong in their message just because they are protesting, even destructively so.

#7 – Of course there are organizers behind the MN demonstrations, protests, and the attacks on law enforcement that I’ve pointed out was so wrong. Does it make all those organizers wrong or terrorists? No, of course not…to think they are is absurd. Do some of them have evil intents, of course. Are some of them revolutionaries? Maybe. So remember this if you want to brand all these folks terrorist or insurgents…no federal law enforcement person has been seriously injured and none killed. But ICE and DHS can’t say the same about the other side.

#8 – Is this just “activism”? No, of course not. But many of these folks are just that, a few aren’t. It is the few that have evil intent that we should be concerned about…and their handlers. Should we be killing people that are absolutely no imminent threat (which is the legal standard)? No reasonable person, no sane person, especially no Christian wants to see people killed in America like this…none! Multiple video versions of both killings show, clearly show, that neither posed a threat, let alone an imminent threat. Who in their right mind wants to see people killed during a demonstration or protest? What decent person is okay with, or celebrates, such deaths?

#9 – Thank you Eric Schwalm for sharing your opinion. It was enlightening. Based on who you say you are, I struggle to give much credence on your views, or credibility on your interpretation of events and people. Based on both the Iraq and Afghanistan wars…they were a complete waste of time, killed far too many military personnel, and squandered massive amounts of money. We destroyed two countries and killed a million people for nothing…and we lost both wars while we did so. Based on your online posts representing your views…you are very radically right-wing and in love with all things military and violence. IMO…you do not represent the political ground that would be conducive to my view of our Founding Fathers. Your views appear to more appropriately match those of the British Empire who wanted to crush the colonial insurrectionists and violently subjugate them to the will of the King.

#10 – Emotions are running very high…absurdly so…on both sides. Both sides want to blame the other…one side is fine with killing, the other wants to kill. Both sides are wrong. The violence is wrong! The US is being manipulated into civil war by all those behind the curtain…on both sides. That is what they want…to have us tear each other apart. And so many people are playing right into their hands. Bias and blindness will lead us into that civil war.

Turn our hearts to Christ…and then pray. I will it again…the violence on both sides must stop!
AH


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Odd… #1

AH Trimble Feedback and CommentsI wrote an article on the 29th < This must stop… > condemning the violence, the attacks on law enforcement, the interference of ICE to do their job, the destruction, and the killings, etc. And apparently some folks didn’t like me calling for a stop to it. I find that odd, disturbingly so. I was calling for a stop to the violence and hatred. I said if it didn’t stop we might end up in a very dark and ugly place. I thought that was a reasonable call to action…stop the violence and hatred.

I received replies/comments from two folks, one of which I know, the other I don’t. It appears to me one is very radically on the pro-violence and far-right of the issue, clearly so. The other response was more of a sharing of another person’s opinion. I responded to their replies. After I did so I thought it through and I think we have hit political obstacle…maybe a dead end to this issue altogether. But for sure…an issue where few are willing to drop bias and change their minds or see reality for what it is vs perception.

So here is what I am going to do…I am going to make two separate posts regarding their views/comments and my replies. I think it prudent to share both sides, different views on this situation. But then I will call the issue closed. Why? Because it is more polarizing than any other issue that I have seen in a very long time. And should the polarization continue at this trajectory all that is needed would be an event, an incident, that would be the ignition point to a far darker time in America than any reasonable person wants.

RE: This must stop…

Texas Dan wrote:

“So here’s my question – the people engaging in these protests are not in fact protesting, they are in open insurrection to the government and laws of this country. Should we care if they are treated without mercy? Paging General Sherman to the white courtesy phone.

Look I have never been a fan of the feds and their tactics, dating to Little Rock in the 50’s in my lifetime and the aforementioned “activity” of Mr. Lincoln in my family’s past. I think your point is that there has to be a middle ground that can be reached, but when have the lawless left ever been satiated? And which laws do they get to ignore to make them happy?

I don’t think the country that would allow a solution exists anymore – you win or you don’t.”

My reply to Texas Dan:

“open insurrection to the government”…I think not. Law breaking on both sides…yes, absolutely…mostly the protestors. Blowing a whistle and holding up an anti-ICE sign is not “insurrection”.

They are humans and should be treated as such. The people that are citizens should be treated in accordance with the Constitution as well as with human dignity…and not shot to death.

General Sherman was at best a war criminal…actually, nothing more than a brutal, murderous animal. <please read We are a Warlike People !>

I didn’t call for a middle ground…I called for everyone to stop the violence before it leads to civil war. And that would play directly into the hands of TPTB.

The protestors need to abide by the law…Constitutional law. And even then, if they break the law they still need due process…not ICE agents that act as judge, jury, and executioner. That is not due process, nor even in the realm of decency.

I agree…the country no longer has a true solution…we have lost our way. And the violence that we see, on both sides, is a result of that lost way.

I would like everyone to read the words to America the Beautiful…there is a clue in there on how we should behave. And it has to do with “mercy”. <please read America the Beautiful !>

AH

Texas Dan then responded with:

“Organized and fully funded “protest” groups are the very definition of an insurgency and thus, in open rebellion. You don’t strike me as naive, but I do beleive you have an historic view of the state of our country and not one reflective of the color revolution shock troops our mistaken President Obama introduced and the brain addled Biden supplemented with 15-20 million slave troops.

They want a Chavez, they should get a Pinochet. Good luck in the coming times.”

My response to that was:

Your definition of “insurgency” is highly inaccurate according the actual legal term(s)…not even close. By your definition…the Jan6th mob were terrorists in open rebellion and thus should have been hanged for treason. And yet, Trump pardoned them. So, according to your use of the term insurgency…what now? And those protesting in MN are not attacking the capital at least. Have you thought that through? 

I don’t consider myself naive, but maybe so. I am more ideological by my way of thinking. I believe in Christ for morals and the Founding Fathers for my political principles.

Their views on central government were very clear…more so regarding state’s rights. And they were for sure not authoritarian. And Washington himself warned us against political parties. Yet, here we are.

A balanced view of life in the US is difficult at best, impossible most of the time. Reality has a habit of clashing with perception.

All the best…we will all need buckets of luck and amazing faith in the days ahead.

And just for the record…did you find fault with me calling for a stop to the violence?

There were no additional replies from Texas Dan.


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Russ

This is from Russ in reference to my article this morning: < Let the numbers ring ! >

Your post has a lot of things going on, which has preoccupied my mind as well, not only with the previous Biden regime, but the past year as well.
The economy is but one aspect. And, true enough, the previous four years were just disastrous – but the past year hasn’t really helped either.

When economies begin to tank, the quick proven method to distract the population is to go to war. We have been on an intentional self-destructive dive with the previous democrat administrations, but to continue on with the same old business as usual defense procurement is absolute disaster. Having a mindset focused on previous conventional wars a well as limited campaigns (still unsuccessful with minor states like Afghanistan and Yemen) will not get us to where we need to be.

And for example, the new “Trump” class of battleships is going to end up the same way as the battleship era ended in World War II. I thought we were learning from all of the scams going on in Minnesota and Ohio. I guess not. (And although there will be a lot of money being spent, it probably will have little effect because most of it will not see the light of day before things will get “kinetic.”

Anyway, I do believe that we are now entering a new era of conflict, which also reminds me of some of the old Vietnam War era songs. (I guess that this dates me)

Emerson, Lake and Palmer’s Lucky Man comes to mind. https://thegreatestsongs.com/lucky-man-emerson-lake-palmer/
And Country Joe and The Fish Vietnam Song as well (a bit crude at the start) https://www.lyricsondemand.com/country_joe_and_the_fish/vietnam_song

For which the chorus was:

and its 1,2,3 what are we fightin for?
don’t ask me i don’t give a dam, the next stop is Vietnam,
and its 5,6,7 open up the pearly gates. Well there aint no time to wonder why…WHOPEE we’re all gunna die.

 

 

I don’t want to appear pessimistic, I just want to be realistic. And I am a veteran. There is going to be a lot of pain ahead of us. I just don’t want to see it be self-inflicted. But I guess that that is the plan.


AH Note #1: Oddly, when you think about it...all those Vietnam War protestors were right all along.
But we still had to kill nearly 60,000 US military personnel before we finally lost that war.
And...nearly 1,000,000 Vietnamese died as well.
Tragic, wrong, avoidable, but a goal of the US federal government.
There was only one winner from that war <click here>

AH Note #2: Yeah, Democrat Administrations love their wars. But, Bush #1 & Bush #2 are both Republicans.
Bush #1 started the first Iraq War. Bush #2 started the second Iraq War and the Afghanistan War.
In the last 25 years Republican Presidents have been far more war-mongering than Dems.

Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Contrasting…#2

AH Trimble Feedback and CommentsI wrote the “Huuuummmmm……….” article a couple days ago, I wasn’t sure if I would get any replies or feedback…but I did. The interesting things that came from them were a bit contrasting in nature. I responded to both under their comments but I thought it would be good to respond in more detail and make a couple of points. I responded to Brent yesterday, “speedilyfriedaf0476a712” today.

Here we go…

speedilyfriedaf0476a712 wrote:

Your facts and research are wrong pearl harbor was attacked on Dec. 7th. Numbers can be cooked to show what you want them to show so let’s stop pretending to read someone else’s mind and start trying to unite the citizens instead of instigating more division.”

So let’s talk about this one point at a time…

Your facts and research are wrong pearl harbor was attacked on Dec. 7th.”

Actually you only pointed out that a single fact was wrong, you didn’t show that any of my research was wrong. I find that interesting.

Yes, you are 100% correct and spot on! I originally wrote it was Dec 5th when in-fact it was the 7th. You were right to point that out. Now, just a bit in my defense…it was a typo. A “typo” is “a typographical error; an error in typing, printing, etc.” I sometimes hit the wrong key(s) when typing, I notice it is getting worse as I get older. Another point that I have to tell about myself…my keyboard and mouse.

Every 2 years or so I have to replace my keyboard…and since they are usually bundled, I replace the mouse as well. I am a bit of a slob around the keyboard. I eat and drink often as I type. Yes, of course I vacuum the keyboard occasionally and sometimes turn it upside down and beat it on the table to get crumbs out. The vacuuming usually gets most of the dog hair out. But, I live in an area that has this really fine red dust than comes in from outside. And yes, we love to have the windows open. That dust doesn’t come out of the keyboard. So it does get “sticky” over time…the solution is replacement. Obviously I am due for it. You could tell if you were here…sticky!

BUT…I am not blaming it on the keyboard…it was a mistake on my part, a typo, and I didn’t catch it during editing…I should have. No excuses.

Now, if you had read other articles on my website referencing the attack on Pearl Harbor you would know, that I know, it occurred on Dec 7th. Feel free to do a search on the site to confirm that.

All that being said, I appreciate you pointing that mistake out to me, I’ve since corrected it.

What I find a little weird is that the “7th” mistake was the only thing you pointed out when you referred to “facts and research” being wrong. Didn’t you find anything else wrong?

Next comes…

Numbers can be cooked to show what you want them to show…”

Absolutely! You are spot on! Problem for me is…well, you didn’t state what numbers that I used that were “cooked”. I would think if you were going to make such a statement and infer fraud that you would back it up with actual evidence. Do you have any? Or, did you just want to lob a grenade at my character and/or article, then run?

Please feel free to return and state your case with my cooked numbers vs your accurate numbers. I try to use the best facts and evidence that I can, I sometimes can get it wrong. And, it is not unusual to see conflicting numbers from different sources. I try to use the most valid and reliable. I welcome any input you may have.

And more…

…so let’s stop pretending to read someone else’s mind…”

Sir, I am not trying to read anyone’s mind. I am stating my opinion and making observations based on actions. I would like to call it journalism…but, I know better…I am far from it. I am just a keyboard warrior throwing my ideas and opinions out there.

I also find it interesting that you used the word “let’s”, that is a contraction for “let us”. Were you implying that you and I both were trying to read minds? If you are, could you help me understand that a little more.

And for the record…I pity the poor soul who tries to read my mind 😉

In conclusion he says…

…start trying to unite the citizens instead of instigating more division.”

It is not my job to try and “unite citizens” or instigate division. Because in reality…I can do neither. I leave it up to people to make up their own minds and choose their own course of action. If politicians and clergy can’t unite people in the US, how do you think I could. And do you honestly think I have enough power to create division in the US?

But let me ask a couple questions:

      1. If I see something that is morally and ethically wrong, should I ignore it and just act like it never happened?
      2. If I see a politician going back on his word (yeah, imagine that) should I not point out the problem?
      3. If I see people being killed, homes destroyed, countries overthrown, kidnappings taking place, or war crimes being committed…should I keep silent and not try to expose it?
      4. If I see an entire country falling apart should I not at least make an effort to right the ship by sharing ideas, opinions, and espousing principles?

Think about what you are asking. Did our Founders stay silent about current events of the British Empire? How could it have change Nazi Germany if more people would have spoken up? How many more Jews could have been saved if people didn’t keep their heads stuck in the sand? How many more 10’s of thousands of US military men and women would have died in Vietnam without the war protests?

Notice all the unity?

There is a time to unite and a time to speak out. When a person sees injustice or other problems it is a time to speak out. It’s called speaking truth to power. When there is a common cause, a consensus, that is a time to unite.

You do realize that the majority of Americans say America is on the wrong track. There is also a majority of Americans that disapprove of Trump’s job performance. What does that mean to you? So are all of the people with a different opinion than you wrong…and should they simply unite behind your opinion?

Someone might say…that is ridiculous that they feel that way! Or, they don’t know what they are talking about! Whatever that bias is…it is still bias. If we seek only unity in politics…we would still be British citizens…or speak German…or not be able to find a Jew anywhere…or still be at war in Vietnam.

Think if more would have spoken out against the war in Iraq or the war in Afghanistan? Maybe some of the nearly 10,000 US personnel wouldn’t have been killed in those wars. Maybe some of the nearly 1,000,000 civilians deaths wouldn’t have occurred.

So there is a time and place for everything. Also, everyone has an opinion and viewpoint. I don’t want people to remain silent when they see injustice or evil taking place. See, I don’t have to agree with them…and, they might just be right. I won’t know until I hear them out.

Sometimes it’s a good thing to not going along with the crowd/mob. Sometimes UNITY is a bad thing!


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Feedback : Contrasting…#1

AH Trimble Feedback and CommentsI wrote the “Huuuummmmm……….” article yesterday, I wasn’t sure if I would get any replies or feedback…but I did. The interesting things that came from them were a bit contrasting in nature. I responded to both under their comments but I thought it would be good to respond in more detail and make a couple of points. I will respond to Brent today, “speedilyfriedaf0476a712” tomorrow. Here we go…

Brent wrote:

It looks to me like a full acknowledgment into a 3 power world. US, China and Russia are carving out and will likely quickly carve out their hemispheres / areas of influence and concentrate on strengthening that influence and start getting the wealth extraction going to build their empires. Venezuela makes sense in that way – kick out Russian and China influence, keep resources in this hemisphere for us or NA/SA continents. Start building SA so it can produce goods rather than sitting on them.

I expect China to go after Taiwan soon, with only token resistance by US. Same with Russia/Ukraine. I think the deals have already been made. I won’t be surprised to see if US ends up with Greenland this year.

I think the republic is truly dead now, but the empire is truly getting a huge life injection, not over the whole world this time, but over the western hemisphere. And the domestic US is only a few small steps from going conservative vs progressive in a way that won’t allow us to live together safely.

I sure hope I’m wrong…Your site is critical in all this as we all need to be prepared as well as we can be for whatever craziness is about to be reaped…”

Brent makes some good points, let me take them in order.

It looks to me like a full acknowledgment into a 3 power world. US, China and Russia are carving out and will likely quickly carve out their hemispheres / areas of influence and concentrate on strengthening that influence and start getting the wealth extraction going to build their empires. Venezuela makes sense in that way – kick out Russian and China influence, keep resources in this hemisphere for us or NA/SA continents. Start building SA so it can produce goods rather than sitting on them.”

Looks as if there are two issues going on here, but in actuality there is only one…the Monroe Doctrine. Essentially, in the early days of the US the leaders wanted the US to stay out of Europe’s business and for Europe to stay out of the western hemisphere.

George Washington in his farewell address talked about avoiding permanent alliances between the United States and foreign nations; NATO would be a perfect example of what he was referring to…to avoid. Rather than “foreign entanglements”, he advocated for a “respectably defensive posture”. Washington made it clear that we -the USA- was not to use force to influence countries. He advocated for “gentle means the streams of commerce” when attempting to influence the ties with America.

Seems as if we have completely abandoned Washington’s warnings and now depend on brute lethal force to influence our relations with foreign countries. And we further screw it all up with NATO, a permanent alliance/entanglement.

When you view the world in terms of “empires” the Monroe Doctrine makes perfect sense. Well, not “perfect” in a good way…in a very power obsessive way. But Brent is 100% correct! The three major empires in the world today are China, Russia, and the United States. (I’m being kind and generous to Russia.) Each are carving out their own chunk of the world where they reign supreme and unchallenged. Problem is…the whole “brute and lethal force” part. The US is not using what Washington advocated for…and we are paying a high price for it. And just for a bit reality check let’s look at every nation/empire that went on the offensive with military might…yeah, they have all fallen. Or in the case of the US Empire, we are falling.

We seemed to have ignored Washington’s warnings and history’s lessons…to our extreme detriment.

Brent continues…

I expect China to go after Taiwan soon, with only token resistance by US. Same with Russia/Ukraine. I think the deals have already been made. I won’t be surprised to see if US ends up with Greenland this year.”

The whole China / Taiwan thing is screwed up. Looking at the perspective of China, they see Taiwan as a breakaway (i.e. rebel) state full of Chinese people. And there is some truth to that. Looking at it as an American, I can see where Taiwan is coming from…they are a group of former rebels that broke away from Communist China and they don’t want to live under that type of government again.

But here is the question…Is this our fight? Not in a true sense of the word…it is an internal/domestic issue that should be settled by China & Taiwan. But there are two influences dragging us into the fight; 1) competing empires…China vs USA, 2) dependence on Taiwan’s chips. Yeah, kinda like the whole money and power thing. If we were not dependent on Taiwan’s chips, then what?

Let’s get realistic…could we win a war against China? Maybe. There is no absolute conclusion that we could win a conventional war with China; there are plenty of “expert” opinions either way. One thing for certain…win or lose…a conventional war with China would devastate the US economy and make life extremely uncomfortable for us. Yup, meaning “trade embargo”.

If the war went nuclear…no one wins…the whole world loses.

But here is the question to ponder…Why in the hell do we (would we) want a war with China? How does that benefit the US? The real answer is we build up our chip manufacturing here in the US at breakneck speed and start reducing our commerce relationship with China. China is one of the USA’s largest trading partners…and it appears to be the largest in terms of day-to-day retail items found in most stores.

As for Greenland…(I really want to swear here). Greenland is a semi-autonomous territory of Denmark. Denmark is a sovereign nation and a NATO member. Only 6% of Greenland citizens want to be part of the US. So we need to keep our hands the hell off Greenland!!!

Leave them alone, they don’t want us…we should honor that if we are decent law-abiding people here in the US. And Orange-T needs to shut the hell up about Greenland and leave them alone. We have no business talking trash about Greenland.

Now, if we somehow “take” Greenland it proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that the USA is perverted and so far away from our founding principles that comparison between the US and Nazi Germany would be 100% accurate.

Don’t forget there are a number of ways that it could appear that the US taking Greenland is a “negotiated deal”. Unless the population of Greenland votes (free & fair), by an overwhelming margin, to join the US and Denmark’s citizenry and government overwhelmingly voluntarily agrees to it…then taking over Greenland by any other means fully qualifies as evil. Not only that…it flies in the face of our Founding Fathers.


Interesting side-note…in 2017 Trump stated [USA] “…not nation-building again…”. Then in 2025 Trump called “interventionists” failures. He has also called interventionists and nation-builders neocons. What is a necon? They believe that the military might of the United States should be employed around the world to promote American interests. Ah, what did he just do in Venezuela? What is he threatening Columbia and now Mexico with? Just saying…


I think the republic is truly dead now, but the empire is truly getting a huge life injection, not over the whole world this time, but over the western hemisphere.”

What is truly strange to me is the sheer number of people that don’t see the US as an empire. Most of them are on the right. The USA qualifies as, meets the definition in every way, as an Empire. The USA quit being a Republic about 135 years ago when we abandoned the Constitution and Bill of Rights. We are kind of a democracy, but in reality more of an oligarchy. And that oligarchy are the ultra-wealthy, the ruling elites. Just look at who is in Washington and you can see it…if a person is not blind.

And yes! The whole Venezuela bombing, invasion, and overthrowing their government is all about their resources…period. If a person can’t see that…again, acute blindness. Resources that benefit our hemisphere and sticks a finger in China’s eye. Yup, called provocation.

And then the outrageous threat against Columbia is nothing more than trying to force them in-line and to force them to be a nice little state of the US Empire. And yes, it is also all about their resources for our hemisphere.

And when I use the term “hemisphere” I am referring to the USA.

And the domestic US is only a few small steps from going conservative vs progressive in a way that won’t allow us to live together safely. I sure hope I’m wrong.”

That is an incredible observation! Notice how both the far-left and the far-right want us to live according to their standards. Once again let’s turn to the Father of our Country…Washington explicitly warned us of the dangers of political parties. He didn’t like them, saw the evil and danger in them, and told us to avoid them. Once again, we ignored him…to our detriment.

Today’s conservatives are not to be honored, revered, sought after, or even trusted. Conservatives try to paint themselves as if they are 100% in-line with our Founders…they are NOT! Today’s conservatives are far more similar to authoritarians…including Orange-T. Just look at his use of Executive Orders…edicts…total so far is 445 Executive Orders. More than any other President in 60 years. But not to worry…Trump still has 3 more years to break the “most” record.

Our Founders, for the most part, were what is called a “classical liberal”…NO, not the “liberals” of today. The closest thing we have today to a classical liberal is what we now call “libertarians”…but they are a little whack compared to old school classical liberal.

Hard numbers are difficult to come by for political ideology. However, it breaks down something along the lines of thirds…each third being; liberal/progressive, conservative/MAGA, moderate. Noting that given any particular election or poll those percentages can vary. So, if the country goes “conservative” and forces the other 2/3 of the country to live by their standards…well, we are in huge trouble…there would be revolution.

I wrote more about political ideology just a little over a week ago <Feedback : I get it !>. You might find it interesting.

Now, let me be clear…I would NOT want to live in a country run by conservatives!! Look at the last 7 Republican Presidencies…all of which claimed to be conservatives. Take away Reagan and you have six Republican Presidencies who are supposedly conservatives…and you want to puke. Yup, puke in terms of what they did to freedoms, rights, and liberties. Not a single one of them truly acted as a Founder or in-line with the Constitution. Actually, a couple of them were 100% authoritarians and blatantly reduced rights, freedoms, and liberties. And all of them blew-up the budget deficits and/or national debt.

So no, a conservative run USA would be horrific in the ways that matter.

Brent’s final comment…

Your site is critical in all this as we all need to be prepared as well as we can be for whatever craziness is about to be reaped…”

Wow, first off…thank you! Second…there are plenty of folks who would disagree with you!

I can’t tell you the number of times that I have wanted to discontinue this website. Every single time I was drastically prompted not to. I will follow those promptings wherever they lead.

Here’s the thing…I have bias in abundance…I have an agenda I am trying to advance…and that should be crystal clear to everyone. What is my bottom line…I want to advance the concepts contained in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and the founding principles of this country. Call me a “literalist” I guess. The Founders believed in certain principles, they finally had to revolt and win to embed those principles in what we now call the Constitution and Bill of Rights. They saw what any other structural or organizational principles will lead to…and they were right…we are it.

The USA today is a monstrosity compared to what our Founders originally set-up. Just look at Washington’s address…he clearly warned us against certain pitfalls…and we ignore them all. The US federal government (US Empire) has become the British Empire of 300 years ago. I am trying my best to use facts, stats, and history to show just that. And you bet your life that my bias and prejudice is here in quantity!

Look, I truly appreciate your comment/compliment, I really do. But, I am not under any illusion…my little website won’t change the trajectory of the US in any way whatsoever. It is like hitting an aircraft carrier with a BB gun. All I pray for is reaching some folks who will listen…and then prepare themselves and their families for what is happening and the tragedy that is coming. Then maybe, just maybe, prepare their congregations and communities in some small way. That’s the best I can hope for and the best I can do…and that is good enough for me. But again, thank you for your kind words.

You know…I am not 100% truthful in that…there is another thing/goal/objective…

He’s looking for you. He wants you. Find Him, learn.

Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2026 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
I may receive compensation from advertised/mentioned products on this website.
See Content Use Policy for more information.