Distractions & Civil War

This is a strange post for me to write…might come off a little disjointed, but I have to speak my mind. It’s important!

And yeah, probably going to offend some folks. Oh well, when did that ever stop me?

Distractions –

First subject: the assassination attempt and information overload…yeah, distractions. Anyone trained in Situational Awareness (SA), and especially those of us who used it regularly for decades in the field understand a very basic concept…Information Overload.

Essentially Information Overload (IO) is when too much information is coming at a decision maker. How is that possible? You go back to a basic tenant/rule of SA…you only need enough information to make a good decision. Too much information can lead to paralysis by analysis. Also, too much information also provides the opportunity to be given bad information.

Let’s take this logically from a professional perspective using well-known and established guidelines and models. First off, what is your family’s preparedness goal? Ours, we aim to be realistically ready/prepared for any emergency, disaster, or grid-down scenario. Let’s say that is your family’s goal as well for this conversation. So for this exercise that goal is an established fact.

Next, there was an assassination attempt on President Trump on Saturday and it wasn’t successful, that is an established fact. Now we have two solid facts, a foundation to compare against.

How does that assassination event impact your preparedness goal? For us, not at all. It might affect yours.

Now does that event affect your preparedness efforts? For us, not at all. You might be in the same boat, or you may be inspired to quicken your preparedness actions or slightly modify them.

Good so far?

Let’s now look at the tsunami of information, some true and some not, some whose truthfulness is completely unknown, some suspect, coming at you regarding the assassination event. Does all that information impact your preparedness goals and actions? For us, not at all. It might affect yours. If so, how?

Realistically speaking, which I doubt that is actually does, how would that information impact your preparedness goals and actions? I think there would be only two logical answers…1) not at all, 2) it urges you to quicken your pace.

Here is where it gets interesting and I might, probably will, offend some folks. If you were going to make a decision on the assassination event itself, or the information that followed, you have already made your decision(s) or come to your own conclusion on the “who and “why”. Right? Well, why take in more information? What value is there is gathering, acquiring more information? I suggest that it is a HUGE waste of time! Why?

Look, you probably either feel it was the result of massive incompetence or a ‘deep state’ plot. At this point…

What freaking difference does it make??????

Here is what I am getting at…in either situation what can you do about it? Nothing, absolutely nothing. It is a done deal, over with, and gathering more information is a complete waste of time. Why? Because time spent reading endless posts and articles, or posting, takes away from truly important things that you should be doing. Such as?

Are you expanding your gardening capabilities? Can you review the preps you have and make notes on what needs tended to? How about taking a first aid class? How about…a million other constructive things you can be doing besides wasting time on information that might or might not be true and has no impact or influence on your view of the event!?!?

There is one exception…if you have NO other responsibilities, no family needs, or prep attention needs…then feel free to spend endless hours reading everything that is being posted on the event. Go for it! And I doubt there is a single person I know, or you know, that is in that boat.

Okay, you have natural curiosity. Fine, I get that. But, how much time spent fulfilling that need is taking away from that which is truly important?

Now let me offend some other folks…Those of you that are posting and posting and posting endless amounts of information, whether true or not…

STOP!!

Nothing you are posting will make a hill of beans difference in the long run. The truth will never come out. And even if it does…you won’t be the source. And even if it does…you will not have made a difference. All your postings do is waste people’s time taking them away from the far more important things they need to be doing in their lives.

And yes, that includes me. I am done posting about the assassination attempt unless there is something unique or vitally important that I alone can provide.

Now I want to raise a serious question about the motive(s) of those posting and posting and posting…

“Why are they doing it?”

  1. They think they are providing a vital service. They are not, at this point.
  2. They want attention. This is egomania, a mental illness problem.
  3. They are trying to convince you of the rightness of their opinion. That is called narcissism, a mental illness.
  4. They are trying to forward a specific agenda. That is probably the most dangerous reason for all the posting.
  5. Some other agenda or obsession, possibly Histrionic Personality Disorder. Or, they just like to see conflict and confusion swirling around by cloaking it in ‘providing information’ or ‘revealing truth’.

There is one additional reason…Click Bait! They want a lot of traffic to a website or channel to boost its value. For me and my website…my postings have been to provide limited information and try and tone down the more sensationalist information floating around. Also, responding to specific requests for information and/or my opinion. But that is over as I said.

Bottom line…don’t waste your time on things that you have no control over and/or no affect on. Use that time far more wisely in your life for more productive efforts. And we don’t need distractions at this point in time…at this point in history. We must be clear headed and watchful NOT distracted!!! Stop with all the distractions…it is not helping anything or anyone.

Next subject – Civil War

I’ve heard a large amount of discussion regarding this assassination attempt and how it is starting a civil war. There are also a notable number of people trying to stir up the pot to the point it is looking as if they are purposely trying to start violence, if not an actual civil war.

Look, back in 2017 I made is clear there was a coup against President Trump. I even named which agencies and who the individuals who were involved. I was, well, everything from ignored to ridiculed for saying it. Turns out I was 100% correct. It was a soft coup to be sure, but a coup all the same. A soft coup is one where actual physical violence doesn’t occur such as tanks rolling into Washington DC and surrounding the White House. Now, that is not to brag or exhibit delusions of grandeur on my part. It is to reinforce my next statement.

Back on September 5th, 2022 I made it pretty clear that I felt Biden had declared war, a civil war, on ½ of the American population. I hinted to that fact regarding the government before and since. Let be crystal clear…I believe a civil war has started in the United States. As to when specifically it started I can’t say for sure…a case could be made for any number of events. And some may refer to it as a second revolutionary war…I can’t disagree with that. The assassination attempt on Trump was a part of this civil war. But, at this point it is a soft civil war.

Who are the opposing parties in this civil war? It would be easy to say Republicans vs Democrats. Wrong! They are one in the same…a threat to our Republic and our Constitution. Well, at least according to our first President George Washington…and he may actually be considered an expert on such matters, eh?

So it could be liberals vs conservatives. Wrong again.

How about my personal favorite…the US federal government vs US citizens? Wrong once more…although getting closer.

You see there are many tools (derogatory version of tools) in this war. You could call them soldiers or useful idiots just as easily. Either label would apply equally. Democrats, Republicans, liberals, conservatives, government politicians, government bureaucrats…they are all these soldiers and/or useful idiots. But, they’re simply tools in this conflict.

The war being waged now could be characterized as the global elitists (TPTB) vs all other people on the planet. And there is much truth in that. But it is not entirely accurate…but close, real close.

The real enemies, opposing forces, here are good vs evil. Yup, pure and simple…period. Like it or not that is what I am telling you. And if you think about it for more than a minute you might find yourself in agreement.

So who is on the side of evil based on eternal Constitutional principles? Examples:

  • Anyone who promotes abortions other than to save the life of the mother.
  • Anyone who advocates for any 2nd Amendment restrictions.
  • Anyone who advocates for any First Amendment restrictions.
  • Anyone who supports any other form of governance for the US other than what is exactly in the Constitution.
  • Anyone who advocates for taking money from those who earned it.
  • Anyone who wants to restrict you from living your life according to God-given rights.
  • Anyone who wants to restrict your access to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

And the list goes on but you get the point. And let me make a modification here. I should have labeled the list as the evil actions of people. Meaning, there are some, probably lots, of good people out there who unknowingly promote evil. If someone knowingly promotes evil, then they are evil. Example: a person who knowingly advocates to limit gun rights to further the agenda of disarming the population is evil because they are doing evil for evil purposes. Why? Because they know full well that it always leads to tyranny and oppression at the hands of government.

Another example: a person who advocates abortion on demand but doesn’t understand that all life is precious in God’s eyes is ignorant not evil, although they are promoting evil.

You get my point by now I hope in this regard.

So the civil war is real, albeit a soft civil war, for the most point. But here comes my real point…my caution…my encouragement…

Don’t advocate for, don’t promote, don’t further a cause or reason for, don’t encourage, don’t do anything at all, or even close to it, that would bring our country closer to actual civil war (shooting civil war). If you know anyone who is promoting or advocating for civil war…rebuke them. If someone is unknowingly moving us towards civil war…talk to them and plead with them to stop what they are doing regardless of how harmless or well intentioned they are.

The US doesn’t need a civil war, we don’t need a revolution…we need a restoration. We need to restore our country to a Constitutional Republic. We need to restore our country to the model of peace, liberty, and individual security that our Founding Fathers envisioned and built. We need to restore law and justice to our country that is found in the Constitution.

Yes, I know the Declaration of Independence gives us both the right and the process by which to change government. But remember the terms it uses:

  • “dissolve the political bands”
  • “to alter”
  • “to abolish”
  • “to institute new government”

Nowhere does the Declaration of Independence state we can use violence or war against the government to do so.

Remember too, it was the British government that started the American Revolution NOT the colonists. It was the British Empire’s standing army that fired the first shots that killed the first Colonial victims. At that point the Colonists were implementing their God-given right of self-defense. When the British Empire gave the Americans no other choice…then it was completely justified for American citizens to defend themselves on a national level and completely abolish the tyrannical and oppressive government of the British Empire.

We are not at that point in America. We have an election coming up…use it! That is how we alter the government we now have that does not support, nor uses, the US Constitution. The ballot box and prayer is how we institute a new government…one that restores the Constitution.

We need to do those things that bring us closer to God, closer to peace, closer to restoration, closer to healing the terrible wounds being inflicted on the United States by the forces of evil.

Prayer and peaceful action is the order of the day. Get rid of everything else in your life that detracts from this. Get rid of those things that are creating conflict. Focus on what you should and can be doing. Throw off that which you can’t change and have no effect over.

And now here is a tough one…if someone is creating distractions, conflict, or confusion in your life, if someone is keeping you from doing that which is needed and important…anyone that advocates for anything but good…do you really need them in your life?

We need to get you house in order and solidify our principles…both will be tested in a way what none of us see coming.

Pray, Plan, Prepare, Practice.

 


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted Assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #3

  • What about the secret service sniper that released that he was ordered not to kill the shooter until after he had fired at former president Trump?

I believe you are referring to the Willis tweet if I am not mistaken. Let’s look at that one with open eyes and a questioning mind. First, he claims the head of the SS was the “shoot / no shoot” decision maker, meaning Director Kimberly Cheatle. That is HIGHLY unlikely. Why? He would more than likely refer to her as “Director” since that is her title…not “head of the secret service”. Next, unless there was some HUGE overriding reason, the Director would not be the “shoot / no shoot” decision maker. It would be left in the hands of the sniper, or, in the hands of the on-scene person directly in-charge of the event detail (Incident Commander) or the person in charge of on-scene Operations.

He also claims he was arrested but doesn’t state who did the arrest or on what charges. The SS would not have arrested him, that would create a public record for one, but the chances of the SS getting clearance to do so would have required developing what to charge him with. That would be no simple task and would probably require DOJ interaction, or, at the very least SS lawyers. Also, the chances of the SS arresting one of their own that quickly would be unlikely. He claims he was interviewed by the FBI, probably true since they would want his story/information to further their investigation. He also claims he was fired. Not really possible at that point. To fire a Federal employee takes some doing and is almost impossible…and truly impossible to do so quickly.

To me this story sounds about 90% untrue by reason, logic, and factual evidence…as I am aware of such. The final tidbit that makes me question this is the fact it happened so quickly and so publicly. You have to remember, that for the most part, the federal government is very, very incompetent. That is one of the reasons it takes them so long to do just about anything. And the amount of scrutiny that this would bring, think ‘publicity’, would be damning to say the least. It would be WAY too clear that this was an ‘inside job’…and I don’t see TPTB making such a blunder.

Now, could it be true? I give it a 10% chance that it is entirely true, or 15% chance that it is partially, true…but no more than that in either case.

  • Why didn’t that local officer kill the shooter when he had a chance?

I believe you are referring to the report that Butler Township officers received word that there was a man on the roof. Reports state that he was hoisted to the roof by another officer but that officer was targeted by the shooter. The officer then retreated for his own safety. The shooter then at that point opened fire on Trump. At least that is my understanding of the report/story.

Here is my take:

If Butler Township officers received those reports, protocol would have them relay that information to the Unified Command Command Post (CP). At that point the communications people would have put that out over the air and the SS snipers (technically called counter-snipers) would have been in the loop on that notification. The SS snipers would have immediately recon’d the building’s roof, and seeing a man with a gun would have engaged. I can’t imagine that Butler Township officers, once receiving the reports would not have reported it up-line.

Also, the retreating officer did what 99% of all officers would have done…retreated under the threat of his own life. Only the most dedicated, the most trained, and the most committed officers would have engaged at the threat of their own life.

Here is the kicker…let’s say this is all true for this conversation. If the reports were actually given to the Butler Township officers, and they reported it up-line, and the CP relayed that information over their ComNet, and the SS snipers received the broadcast, and the SS snipers saw the shooter engaging the Butler Township officer, the SS snipers would have fired right then and there killing the shooter and not waiting on a “shoot / no shoot” from command. Right?

So work it backwards…we know the SS sniper did not engage the shooter until after the shooter fired multiple rounds. Meaning; 1) they didn’t see the shooter/officer engagement, or 2) didn’t receive any notification of the shooter on the roof, 3) or??? Next; 1) the CP didn’t receive the report from the Butler Township officers and therefore didn’t put it out over the ComNet, or 2) the CP received the report from the Butler Township officers but chose to not put it out over the ComNet for whatever reasons. Next; 1) the Butler Township officers never received the report(s) from civilians, or 2) they received the report(s) and chose not to relay the info up-line and investigate the situation themselves, or 3) they received the report(s), relayed it up-line and then investigated.

Remember, I was a federal employee for 16 years, I’ve worked hundreds of incidents with other federal employees, including incidents where state and local resources were involved. My experience tells me that incompetence ruled that day in this situation, if it is true; meaning, the sheer amount of incompetence in these situations in mind-blowing. Also, the theory of Occam’s Razor points to incompetence as the likely reason this huge lapse of action/judgment happened.

However, this question must be considered…Is the story itself true or not to begin with? Also, are there parts of the story true and other parts not true?


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted Assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #2

  • Do you think the assassination attempt was “allowed” to happen?

I am not sure exactly what you mean by “allowed”. If you mean the Secret Service was behind it…I have no reliable and verified evidence or knowledge that is the case. And, I haven’t heard anyone who has any valid and reliable information that they were.

The sheer number of SS agents that would be in the loop on such a plot would be pretty large. And that would tell me that there is a high likelihood that someone would object and potentially whistleblow. Also, I can’t imagine all those that would have to be involved could collectively keep their mouths shut. But that does open up another train of thought.

According to the laws of logic…

Based on the actions/reactions of the SS agents on scene it is obvious that the entire operation was a failure from the beginning. Meaning, the shooter’s building wasn’t cleared and then secured. As people saw the shooter climbing the building and getting into position they reported it to law enforcement…and law enforcement didn’t take action to stop him. At least 2 SS snipers were looking in his exact direction for 3 – 4 minutes prior to the shooter opening fire and took no action until the shooter got off 4 – 8 rounds.

Once Trump was shot and down it should not have taken the SS more than 60 seconds at most to be moving him into the armored car…they took much much longer than that. The whole idea of numerous agents surrounding a protectee is to provide a human shield against the protectee being shot again, whether by the original shooter or additional shooters. If you look at the SS agents as they are moving Trump they leave Trump wide open for a second shooter to score direct hits center mass or head shots. That should never ever have happened by anyone even remotely qualified to be executive protection detail members.

I’ve already mentioned the female agent who played with her sunglasses multiple times while Trump was being moved. Of course she should have, they were probably multi-hundred dollar Oakly’s! Gotta maintain that cool SS look, right? What was really cute was another female SS agent at the armored vehicle as Trump was being placed inside, she is trying to holster her weapon. Ah, about 12 tries later she gave up and went back into a bad-ass low ready position…looking dazed and confused. Muscle memory should have gotten her weapon holstered the first time. That tells me she is seriously deficient in training. And that is verified by ALL the SS agents actions trying to move Trump…it was a clown show.

So what does logic have to do with it? Simple…you implied that the SS might have allowed it to happen. I provided logical information that probably wasn’t the case. If SS agents didn’t allow it to happen is then true, then the opposing facts are true…the SS was entirely incompetent in that operation. Both can’t be true…unless of course the incompetence was feigned to allow all of the failures to line up and result is catastrophe. But that would oppose the theory of Occam’s Razor.

This is called the Swiss Cheese model of event/accident causation, it is a model used in risk analysis and risk management (a.k.a. “Cumulative Act Effect”). Basically all the failures line up and create the catastrophic failure effect. Meaning no person, or not enough persons, takes action to prevent the catastrophic failure event/accident. You can read more about this concept and methodology < click here >

As for the female agents…before someone goes off on me…let me give you more ammunition. If you watch the videos you can see that the female agents are all but useless when trying to shield Trump…they aren’t large enough and never in a useful position. As Trump is being moved the female agents appear “lost”. As they are putting Trump into the vehicle the female agents once again just kinda wander around unable to perform any meaningful actions. And here is the great thing about that…the SS has a goal that by 2030 30% of all protective field agents are designated to be female. Yeah, let’s not go for the best of qualified folks to be agents, oh no…let’s identify new agents simply based upon gender as a qualification. Then you wonder why the SS has lost credibility and respect and can longer adequately perform their duties…for decades.

  • What is the strangest part of all this?

That is a fantastic question, thank you! Oddly for me it really is disassociated directly from the shooting itself. In my last article “How is this to blame on Biden?” I relayed the information when Biden put the “bullseye” on Trump. That statement was made during a private phone conference with multiple Democrat Party mega-donors. So his “bullseye” statement is bad enough…sounds like ordering a hit. But, what I find most interesting…who leaked that information and why?

Wouldn’t you think that all those on the phone call were party loyalists who are big-time donors, and/or Biden staff. And wouldn’t they then want to protect Biden from that kind of legal and publicity damning spot-light? So why was the info leaked, eh? Oh, come on…you know why.

  • The FBI was investigating the shooting, why is the DHS now investigating as well?

The FBI is normally the lead agency (Agency Having Jurisdiction) when it comes to these matters of current and former federal employees/politicians. The DHS is normally the Agency Having Jurisdiction when it comes to domestic terrorism events.

A case could be made that this is just inter-agency rivalry and agencies flexing their muscles to maintain their territory. Or, a case could be made that now that this is branded an act of domestic terrorism ANY and ALL information that is gathered is now classified at the highest standards. And that means it more than likely doesn’t get released…ever.

How convenient, eh?


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted Assassination of Trump: How is this to blame on Biden?

  • How is this to blame on Biden?

Just days before the attempted assassination of Trump by a man with a rifle, Joe Biden said these words, “I have one job and that’s to beat Donald Trump. We’re done talking about the [6/27] debate. It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.”

Read that again, It’s time to put Trump in the bullseye.”

These words were spoken by Biden in private to a number of large private donors on a phone call. There was considerable concern about Biden losing to Trump and the donors were considering reducing or stopping donations to Biden’s campaign.

So what is a “bullseye”? It is a target used for shooting practice/training. It is also a reference to killing something as in hunting or for snipers. A strong case could easily be made that Biden himself called for the assassination of Trump…by being shot with a rifle by a sniper.

In Biden’s defense I doubt that the assassin on the phone call and heard the words directly from Biden. However, in public and at numerous events Biden has called Trump a threat to democracy and a threat to the United States. Biden also called for America to unite against not just the threat to the nation and democracy from Trump but unite against and fight all MAGA folks and Republicans.

I think Biden should be questioned under oath on video exactly what he meant by each and every one of his statements, their context, potential repercussions, and exactly why he made them with such a clear insinuation of a call to violence against his political opponents. And that interview/deposition should be made public.

Now, do research on your own not just what Biden has said when calling for violence against Trump…research all the other Democrats, especially their politicians, and how they have called for and how incendiary their speeches and comments have been.

Please pray for President Biden that his heart will be softened and that he will ignore any calls for him to increase his inflammatory rhetoric and his calls for violence against Trump and MAGA Americans. Pray for Biden to realize the seriousness of this situation and simply campaign on issues, being civil while doing so. Please Pray for Biden to lead this country more so as God would be pleased to see.

Pray for our entire country…especially pray for peace and calm.


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #1

Some questions have already started coming in…

  • Q: Was it a CIA operation?

A: I assume you are referring back to the JFK assassination where there is a significant amount of evidence, including participant and witness statements, that the JFK assassination was a joint CIA/Mafia operation. I have no evidence that the attempt on Trump’s life yesterday was a CIA operation or that they participated in it in any capacity. I would also hope that they had no advance warning of it, and allow it to happen. Is the CIA capable of it? Of course. They train their field operators in assassination tactics just like this. Assassination of world leaders is part of the CIA’s operational specialty but there is no evidence or reliable speculation at this time that this was a CIA operation.

  • Q: How soon till we know exactly what happened?

A: Never. The federal gov’t, in this case the FBI/DOJ, will never release what you are looking for. They will brand it a matter of national security and bury it forever. Remember, JFK was murdered in 1963, more than 60 years ago, and we still don’t have all of the information, or the real information, from event. And that includes Trump refusing to make that info public. The question now is, “Why won’t that information ever be known by the public?” The answer is simple…the masters, US federal government, do not feel it is right for us common folks, serfs, to know…we are not worthy in their eyes…we can’t handle the truth and we can’t be trusted with the truth…so they say.

  • Q: Do you really think the FBI can’t do a quality investigation?

A: Do I think they are capable of a quality investigation? Yes. Will they do an honest, fair, open, and truthful investigation? No. Look at the FBI over the last 35 years…tell me when they ever were truthful with the American public? Will they figure out the details? Yes, of course. And it will remain buried just like the JFK murder.

  • Q: They’ve identified the man as a ‘Republican’. Why would a Republican do such a terrible thing?

A: Question everything. Was he actually a Republican? When did he register as a Republican? Did he vote Republican? Why would authorities go to such lengths to reveal that particular piece of information? A great misdirection tactic is to identify somehow with the target…as in being on the same side.

  • Q: What should I do?

A: I am not sure of your exact question. But let me urge you in the strongest terms…DO NOTHING! Well, not exactly true. Pray. Pray for ALL the victims of the shooting and their families. Pray for peace and calm. Pray that those people who are unhinged, or close to it, will not do stupid things. But for you personally…be peaceful and pray.

  • Q: You have advised us for a long time to not go to these events. Thank you!

A: Well, that wasn’t exactly a question but I will treat it as one for my own purposes. For a really long time I have told my website visitors this kind of stuff was coming; that it was just a matter of time before the real violence hit. There was one person killed by a bullet to the head, another critically wounded. Rumors that there may be at least one other civilian wounded. You will not be, were not, a casualty if you don’t/didn’t attend these kinds of events. There is nothing positive to be gained by attending these events…stay away.

< click here to read the Q&A – Part #2 >


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

The National Anthem…what makes Americans…

The morning of July 4th I asked you to read the words of the American National Anthem, to ponder it, to listen to the message it whispered to you. I hope you followed through on that.

I became aware this morning that not everyone knows the background, the history, of why we have the National Anthem…and its deep meaning. The story is amazing…full of the patriot spirit of Americans in the first 3 decades following a hard fought independence from tyranny and oppression.

The British Empire came back with all of its might to once again subdue the American spirit…to crush Americans back into submission to tyranny. The National Anthem was born of that struggle…and is worth contemplating. I’ve chosen this video that tells that story.

Please take the short 11 minutes…it will be worth your while. Then again…listen to what is whispered to your heart, to your soul.

 

 


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

! DANGER ! I’ve been thinking about the debate…

I’ve been thinking about the clown show Presidential Debate last Thursday. I shared my thoughts early the next morning < click here >, then answered questions from ya’ll who wanted my opinion. Over the weekend I kept thinking about the debate off and on…something just didn’t seem to sit right…something seemed off…maybe something lurking in the shadows. Then Sunday morning it kinda crystallized.

A question from “xpansan” kept coming back to me…

what are the rest of the world leaders, particularly China, Russia and North Korea, thinking of last nights debate?

You can read my quick response to him based on my thoughts at the time < click here >. But, his question repeatedly came back to me Sunday morning. I decided to look at the consequences of the debate from a ‘country’ perspective on the world stage. That concept was what kept nagging at me.

Let me clarify…

No one in their right mind, no one with an IQ over 10, no reasonable person of any political persuasion can even begin to think that Biden can act competently as President of the United States. He just simply can’t…period. His dementia, his insanity, his feebleness, his lack of awareness, his physical condition…nothing about him indicates that he has any ability to perform Presidential duties other than sleeping in the West Wing bed. And that is only possible because Jill puts him to bed at night after she changes his Depends.

Okay, all joking aside…I will get on with it.

As I thought through this there are two ways I viewed it…1) this is happening all on its own, 2) this is being coordinated on a global level. I will call these views.

Now, there are also two groups of world leaders who are our enemies who view this Biden Presidency as an opportunity.

Group #1 – Russia and China. Regardless of what else you think, Xi and Putin are smart, very smart individuals. They know what they are doing and clearly see the condition of the US with Biden as President.

Group #2 – Iran and North Korea. Their leaders(hip) are morons for the most part. Both are radical, Iran more so. They can see what/who Biden is but they only see the US through some very weird and jaded bias.

As for my view #1 – If this is just happening all by coincidence, meaning Biden was duly and fairly elected, and he is acting on his own…then I think Group #1 looks at this as an opportunity to strengthen their influence in the world, expanding their presence militarily and politically, become stronger militarily domestically, and become financially more stable/stronger globally. I do not see them as making strong military moves, starting a war with us, or initiating a nuclear strike. For China there will come a time for them to finish deposing us as the #1 empire in the world, but I don’t think that time is now due to Biden. Putin is a smart guy, politically savvy, and a true believer in Russia as an expanding empire. He also knows that Russia stands no military chance against the US let alone all of NATO. Putin will not start any kind of direct military confrontation with the US.

Now, Group #2 with View #1 – Iran already struck against Israel which they see as a strike against the US. It matters not what the outcome was…it matters only that they struck. Iran sees Biden as weak, almost a vegetable…but also as an ally. Remember it was Biden as President who gave Iran BILLIONS of dollars just a couple of years ago and it was Biden as Vice President who headed the operation to send plane loads of cash to Iran while Obama was President. And it was Biden who restored the ability of Iran to develop nuclear weapons. Iran is crazy enough to start anything with the US in our severely diminished state under Biden…but may not since Biden is their ally. As for North Korea…he is nuts and could start anything at any time against the US (or South Korea) for any reason at any level.

So View #1 is kinda like an “organic situation”…it is exactly what you see…everything happening on its own. But, the world situation is pretty predictable overall if you understand the leadership players’ motivation and goals.

Now, there is View #2…global coordination. Yeah, I mean that Biden’s election/selection was planned, coordinated, and executed at the global level by TPTB. And Biden’s election/selection was designed for them to carryout certain tasks/missions to reach their ultimate goal. If that is the case then Group #1 & #2 will only do those things that they are either told to do or allowed to do. And let me tell you…if you can guess what the TPTB have planned for the near future…well, you are pretty dang good…better than me.

If my View #1 is accurate then we are pretty safe as a country…for the most part…from a major threat from a major player (Russia & China). However, we could be decimated by a tactically sound and surprise operation from Iran or North Korea. And yes, it could result in a much wider, if not global, conflict depending on the US response.

If my View #2 is accurate…then there is no telling how safe the US is or is not; it will be up to TPTB.

How does Biden play into this…and what is my bottom line?

Under View #1 – Biden is essentially nonfunctional as a person, and a complete empty shell as a President in a situation where time is of the essence and a military conflict erupts. If Biden is left to make decisions we, as a country, are doomed. If Biden is not making the decisions…well who is and what is their intent? That situation also does not bodes well for the US.

Under View #2 – Biden will be told what to do, when to do it, and how to do it. This situation means we are at the whim of TPTB…unless someone high in the government objects and makes moves to that effect. In either situation we, as a country, are truly screwed.

Bottom line…as a country this is an extremely dangerous time…and I mean extremely. For national leadership we have a non-functioning, lights-out President and a moron, easily controlled/manipulated Vice President. The USA has no capable leadership at this time…at least none at the national level acting for the benefit of the country.

If Biden is once again elected/selected…then look for TEOTWAWKI as a real possibility.

If I am right, or even close, are you prepared? If not, will you prepare? If you will, how?

But something else is also nagging at me just a bit as well…for those seeing this an opportunity for a new President…be careful what you wish for.


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

GREAT question!!

  • From: xpansan

Would that question be, what are the rest of the world leaders, particularly China, Russia and North Korea, thinking of last nights debate?

That was not the question I was thinking…but it is a GREAT question!!

I would love to hear what you think.

For me…I can only imagine! The Tier 1 countries are probably laughing their butts off thinking how stupid we are for electing/selecting Biden. The most powerful country in the world whose President can’t tie his own shoes…or even know what shoes are. We are a joke to them.

For our enemies…they have to be shaking their heads wondering why we would want to be run by a clown…a fool that can’t put a full sentence together…a man who wears Depends coz he craps himself in public.

For the third-world countries…they are probably saying, “Welcome to the club US!!”

Now…in regards to the possibility of Trump being President…dang! The world’s countries’ leadership probably are worried coz they never know for sure what he might do…about anything. And that is not necessarily a bad thing. Our enemies are probably just saying to themselves and each other…”Crap!”

As for the actual, true leaders of the world…I don’t know what they are thinking for Trump. But for Biden I am sure they smile to themselves and know they completely control him…and thus the USA.


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Who would be the Dem nominee?

  • From: TM

If Biden is out, who would be the Dem nominee?

  • From: Michael

YES YES YES. 100% yes. That is exactly why they pushed the debate early in the process – so they could replace him. So the public could truly see that he is not able to run and “lead” the country. Not only did Biden take himself out of the running, the members of the left will demand it be done “for the good of Biden and the country”. They planned on replacing him, but this was the key to allowing it to be done “effortlessly”. Now…who will the replacement be? Hillary? Michael (sorry, Michelle)? Newsom (I highly doubt this one)?

That is a tricky question to be sure. I can’t read the minds of the Democrat Party masters. From a purely political perspective I would think that Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, and Cory Booker would all be in the top tier running.

I don’t think that Hillary Clinton would be their nominee at all. I just don’t see it; too old, too controversial, too easy to hate, to overshadowed by Bill, and she can’t resist making a fool of herself when she speaks.

I don’t think Kamala Harris would be their nominee either. She is dumb as a rock…sorry about the insult to rocks. There are far too many video clips out there of her making a complete and total fool of herself. And I don’t think she is well liked within the Democrat Party either.

I think the outlier to watch out for, a valid dark horse contender to not be ignored…Michelle Obama. I could see the Dems begging for her to save the election, to save the country…and she would have to accept…it would be her civic duty to save the world.

But my guesses are all based on politics…not on power. Remember I said that Biden wouldn’t be the nominee in 2020…I sure did get that wrong! The problem…again, I was thinking politics not power.

What I mean by that is the power behind the curtain wanted an easily controlled tool as President. Someone that they could force to do their bidding, not Biden’s…and certainly not what is best for the country. In that light…Biden was the perfect choice…and I missed it not thinking “power”.

And here is a “gotcha”…If the power people still want a tool/fool…why not have Biden elected/selected again!? He fades away…and the Vice-President steps in. Interesting thought, eh?


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

  • From: TM

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

I am so glad you asked 🙂  I wanted you to work for it.

No one…and I mean no one expected Biden to do well in a debate with Trump. Okay, maybe Biden himself thought he would do well but he has dementia.

So why did Biden’s handlers and masters allow him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose? Actually, the question should be…

”Why did Biden’s handlers and masters make him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose?”

By default Biden was the Democrat Party nominee…period. He is the sitting President, that gives him the right to it…it was his to turn-down or not. And he didn’t turn it down…he expected to be, demanded to be, the Democrat Party nominee for the 2024 Presidential election cycle.

Could the party take him out of the running? No, plain and simple…it would wreck the party.

So it fell to Biden’s handlers and masters to take him out of the running…to open the door for another nominee. There was absolutely no need for them to try and talk him out of the nomination…it would create too much stress and tension within the party and diminish the power of the handlers and masters by putting them into the position of convincing him…or even discussing it with him.

The answer…go along with him, make him feel important, keep the party together…and let Biden take Biden out of the running. And Biden did just that at the debate…he effectively removed himself as the Democrat Party presidential nominee.

How do I know that?

Don’t listen to the Republican/Conservative talking heads and politicians on how the debate went. Listen closely to what the Democrats are saying about Biden’s debate performance. Especially important are what the Democrat Party insiders are saying…the true power players. Without exception they are all saying they are worried about his debate performance; but they are also clearly voicing their concerns about his ability to beat Trump in the election.

Remember David Axelrod, Democrat Party operative and Obama handler? Well, Axelrod publicly stated “If, for whatever reason, there’s a change at the top of the ticket, you guys are in trouble with Donald Trump. Because the guy who was up there tonight is not a guy who’s going to inspire people.” That is Biden’s political death sentence.

Don’t get me wrong…the real power behind the Democrat Party was never going to let Biden be the nominee…they just had to decide on the right way to kick him to the curb. And they did that Thursday, June 27th, 2024. Well played!


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p