Category Archives: Q & A

Q&A: Trump Epstein Scandal #1

Posted on by

RE: There is no “client list” !

  • Why did Patel & Bongino go along with the cover-up?

Remember the “cover-up” is less than a month old. The joint FBI/DOJ undated memo only came out in early July…released at the end of a long 4th of July holiday weekend. So this is still a relatively new event.

And, I think it was back in May that Bongino and Patel were interviewed…and both denied the Epstein Conspiracy. Ah, did you watch that interview and see Bongino’s body language and facial expressions. There was obviously a problem…I think Bongino was not in any way comfortable with what was being said.

Bongino is former NYPD, strike one. And He is also former federal law enforcement (Secret Service) strike two. So by default he is prone to “go along to get along”. Then add in he currently has a vaunted position in the FBI via Trump himself. All that tends to indicate that Bongino is just another “team player” advocating the party line.

Then you have to remember that both Patel and Bongino openly forwarded the case for, and belief in, an Epstein Scandal. And they did so for a considerable amount of time before Trump brought them on to the team. And Bongino has been in the past particularly convincing that he is populist and an opponent of the DeepState…a straight shooter.

Now, Patel…ouch. Here is what I wrote back in December 2024…

“For me, the spirit whispered to me a clear message…this man is a man with morals, with character, with principles, a man who loves this country and the Constitution…and wants both the rule of law (the Constitution) and the Republic restored.”

So, I was either wrong back then or Patel has gone off the rails in historic terms since Trump put him in the FBI. In all reality Patel is a lawyer, strike one. And he has been an employee of one level of government or another (including the DOJ) his whole career, strike two. So did Patel become just another G-man? I don’t know…it sure looks like it.

Okay, now for my more direct answer to your question…I don’t know why Patel and Bongino have gone along with the Epstein Scandal cover-up. I just don’t get it. However, it is still a young cover-up so one or both may break ranks and reveal the extent of the cover-up, especially the “who & why” aspects. But don’t count on it. I am sure both had to sign a secrecy pledge when they went to work for the FBI. I would think, that unless they want to risk prison time, they won’t actually go against the party line.

Personally, I think Bongino hates what he knows and is uncomfortable keeping it to himself. If he shares that knowledge or not remains to be seen. I get the idea he is a tortured soul at this point.

Then again the government, and especially the FBI, have a way of destroying people’s morals and souls.

  • In your post about FBI covering up what did you mean by that?

It is well known and established fact that the FBI covers-up their own activities to protect themselves as an agency, protect their leadership, etc. The most recent evidence of such criminal activity came to light at the beginning of July when it was revealed the FBI blocked a probe into alleged Chinese 2020 election meddling to protect then FBI Director Wray from any backlash. Meaning Wray repeatedly stated the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was not influencing the presidential election in favor of Biden. In reality the CCP was doing just that and the FBI (including Wray) knew about it, documented it, and covered it up so Wray wouldn’t be exposed as lying to Congress, lying to the media, and lying to Americans.

If the truth had come out Wray would be guilty of lying under testimony to Congress and subject to federal prosecution and would be looking at prison time.

Remember what I’ve written earlier about two Americas for the judicial system and the DeepState…the FBI is smack dab in the middle of it.

< click here to to read the Fox article >

  • Why aren’t you reporting that the Epstein Operation was actually an Israeli intelligence operation?

Nice catch! Let me share this with you first…

Yup, that is the Dan Bongino who is now the Deputy Director of the FBI. But the post is before his appointment.

Okay, back to your question. I haven’t posted, directly at least, that there is connection between the Epstein “honey pot” intelligence services operation and Israel’s Mossad other than to point out that the father of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s girlfriend and “business associate”, was an Israeli Mossad agent. And I didn’t point out that my research shows that her father ran an almost identical operation as Epstein’s.

Why? Here’s where it gets tough for me…I want multiple valid and reliable sources of information before I put anything out there for folks to read. And in this case I never hit the point where I was fully satisfied to that point. If we were having a personal face-to-face conversation I would have shared that info…but with caveats.

In my personal opinion…with all due caveats…Israel’s Mossad and the CIA ran this as a joint operation on the international level, with the initial start-up being handled by Ghislaine Maxwell’s father. Important to note that her father was murdered within months after Ghislaine was introduced to Epstein…Maxwell, naked, was thrown off his really big, expensive yacht. His body was taken to and buried in Jerusalem.

FWIW…Ian Robert Maxwell’s birth name is Ján Ludvík Hyman Binyamin Hoch. Born in Czechoslovakia.  He became a UK citizen in 1946. He didn’t change his name until 1948. During WWII he became a British officer and in 1945 was attached to the British Foreign Office (similar to the US Department of State). It was this appointment that has fueled speculation Maxwell began working for MI6 (UK’s CIA) and was recruited by Israeli agents. He married a French woman who was from French Kings linage. The stuff of spy novels!!!

Ghislaine Maxwell and her father Robert Maxwell.

Robert Maxwell with Prince Charles…now King of England

And yes, since you are going down that rabbit hole…there is speculation and rumor that Ghislaine Maxwell herself was a Mossad agent recruited by her father and she was Epstein’s “handler” for the Mossad side of the operation. BUT…that is only speculation and nothing I could substantiate in any reliable way.

I hope this satisfies your question.

Related Articles –
Related Videos –
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2025 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Q & A: The FBI vs President Trump

Posted on by

Q: Is the FBI really against Trump? (name withheld)

A: That was a very broad question, too broad for me to answer in detail here. Now, if you are referring to the whole issue of Trump wanting to see if there were any improprieties or illegalities with the FBI regarding the Jan6th operation and investigation…yes, the FBI is battling Trump (the FBI’s words, not mine). Not only that, it could get worse, far worse.

As of now, as far as I can tell, there are two separate groups of FBI personnel who are suing President Trump to stop the investigation of the FBI. Those suing Trump want to remain unknown and their actions kept secret regarding their activities associated with Jan6th. For reasons as yet unknown, the FBI doesn’t want their actions or names to be made known, and they don’t want to be held accountable.

So my question would naturally be…”Why don’t they want the information to become known?”

Various public responses from the groups have been pretty much the same:

  1. Safety of those involved.
  2. National security.

#1 has some merit, but very little; #2 has no merit whatsoever. The whole “national security” thing has been abused by the federal government for 70 years. When you hear anyone in the federal government use “national security” as an excuse to keep something from the public…you can bet about 98% of the time they are covering up a crime they committed.

So it all boils down to a couple thousand FBI folks don’t want to fill out a survey form regarding their activities relating to the FBI’s Jan6th operation/investigation. So how does that in any way, shape, or form impact national security? Exactly!!!! It doesn’t.

Here is some context…

You know there is a question that law enforcement uses when a person refuses to answer questions…

“If you have nothing to hide, why don’t you answer the question?”

And when someone objects to being investigated/interrogated, law enforcement will ask…

“If you haven’t done anything wrong, why not cooperate?”

It all boils down to this…in my opinion…

“If the FBI personnel have nothing to hide, why don’t they just answer the questions?”

“If the FBI personnel haven’t done anything wrong, why not cooperate?”

You can stop reading at this point if you like. But, I thought I would throw some more context, history, and wild outrageous theories out there for you…

If you are still reading…let’s recap a couple of things:

  • 1993 PBS did a documentary, “For nearly 50 years, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover amassed secret files on America’s most prominent figures, files he used to smear and control presidents and politicians.” FYI, Hoover was the original FBI Director.

  • In 2009 Don Fulsom documented that FBI director J. Edgar Hoover was controlled, via blackmail, by the Mafia. The problem…Hoover’s gambling and homosexuality documented with pictures in the possession of the Mafia.

  • In 1993, Anthony Summers documented with multiple witnesses that in 1958 Hoover was a cross-dresser and had sex with several young blonde “boys”. The witnesses described in detail the different dresses that Hoover wore as well as identifying others who were present including a former counsel to a Senator (widely acknowledged as being gay).

  • In 2022, it was documented that multiple FBI agents themselves knew about Hoover’s deep ties to the Mafia. The agents revealed stories of Hoover traveling multiple times to Manhattan to meet one of the Mafia’s top figures, Frank Costello. The two would meet in Central Park.

  • And hundreds more documents and evidence that Hoover was as dirty a cop as you could possibly imagine.

Why is any of that relevant? The founding director of the FBI was…well, let’s just say compromised. And documented evidence shows that the FBI Director blackmailed politicians, including Presidents, for decades. For me I think a question comes to mind:

If the FBI started to answer questions now, how much more would come to light about what the FBI has really been involved with?

A natural comment would be…Well, that was only FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover, not today’s FBI personnel.

Okay, but what about the last FBI Director, Christopher Wray, not just refusing to answer questions from the FBI Congressional Oversight Committee, but also lying to them under oath? Is there a pattern here?

And shall we not forget the FBI’s well documented campaign and coup against Trump starting back in 2016.

Putting that into perspective…and adding in their long history…it becomes pretty clear what went on and what is going on.

So how could it get “far worse”? Don’t know…probably nothing to see here…move along.

Let’s look at a little history…until 1962 FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover denied the existence of an organization, the Mafia. In 1961 John F. Kennedy was sworn in as President of the United States. In 1961 President Kennedy appointed Robert F. Kennedy as US Attorney General. In 1962 Robert F. Kennedy, US Attorney General, ordered FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover to investigate not just organized crime, but specifically the Mafia.

Oddly, in November 1963 President Kennedy was assassinated. In 1968 Robert F. Kennedy was assassinated as he was running for President.

The man who was blamed for the assassination of President Kennedy was Lee Harvey Oswald. Documentary evidence proves when Oswald was arrested in New Orleans on multiple charges in August 1963 he requested to speak to a specific FBI agent. After that meeting Oswald’s charges were all dropped except for a single misdemeanor charge of disturbing the peace and he was fined $10. Later, evidence also proved that Oswald was a CIA asset as well.

Strangely enough…RFK was assassinated in 1968 during his campaign for President…allegedly by Sirhan. And another oddity was the “second gun-man” theory regarding the assassination. The gun used by Sirhan was an eight-shot .22LR caliber Iver Johnson Cadet 55-A revolver. Eight people were hit in the shooting, including Kennedy being hit 3 times, with another round passing through his jacket. Another 5 people were wounded.

However, forensic investigators found evidence of 13 rounds having been fired. Further, the trajectory of the entry wound of the round that entered Kennedy’s brain didn’t match the position of the alleged assassin. And there were multiple witnesses, including Kennedy staff, that reported that there was a woman and man that were involved in the shooting. Oddly, Sirhan was only able to fire 2 shots before he was tackled to the ground and covered by the bodies of several men. Although, Sirhan did keep firing his revolver while under the pile of bodies.

But even stranger, kinda, one of Kennedy’s advisors who was also shot that night stated that there was a second gunman. And RFK, Jr after meeting with the alleged killer Sirhan stated someone else shot his father.

Now let’s throw this in there as well…RFK, Jr. pointed out that Sirhan’s lawyer at his original trial, Grant Cooper, was Johnny Rosselli’s personal lawyer. “Roselli,” RFK, Jr said, “was the [Mafia] mobster who ran the assassination program for the CIA against Castro. Cooper pressured Sirhan to plead guilty so that there was no trial.”

Just hang in there with me a minute…this gets so incredible and really interesting.

  • RFK, Jr says Thane Eugene Cesar killed his father.

  • At the time of the killing Thane Eugene Cesar worked for Lockheed Aircraft, a CIA contractor. Cesar worked in an area of Lockheed controlled only by the CIA.

  • But Cesar also was “moonlighting” for a security company Ace Security Services. Ace was providing security for Kennedy. Cesar was added to the security detail at the last minute.

  • And Cesar had also worked for Hughes Aerospace. Howard Hughes owned Hughes Aerospace. Howard Hughes also had deep ties to the CIA.

  • Cesar had been seen in Las Vegas with a known Florida-based mob hitman shortly before RFK was killed.

  • Hughes Aerospace was headquartered in Las Vegas and Howard Hughes lived in Las Vegas.

  • Cesar changed his story to police about the shooting multiple times.

Notice the tie on the ground to the left of RFK? It belongs to Thane Eugene Cesar. “Allegedly” Kennedy ripped it off of Cesar while defending himself? Ironically, it was later revealed that Cesar hated both the Kennedy brothers and thought them a threat to the United States. So why was he hired at the last minute as a security guard for Kennedy?

One last bit on info before I wrap this up…the coroner stated the shots that entered RFK’s body came from the back of Kennedy, slightly to the right side, at point blank range (meaning no more than 1″ – 3″ away). However, all witnesses stated that Sirhan had always been in front of Kennedy during the incident probably at a distance of 3 – 4 feet, but in no case closer that 1-1/2 feet. Guess where Cesar was standing the whole time from before and during shooting…yup, you guessed it…right behind Kennedy, literally holding Kennedy’s right arm…within inches.

Okay, I can’t resist this one…remember the woman and man running away from RFK’s killing? Yeah, multiple reports/witnesses indicate that the woman was a CIA “handler” and the man was a CIA “operative”.

So, if I were a skeptical man, thinking outside the box just for the fun of it:

  • Both Kennedy brothers objected to the CIA.
  • Both Kennedy brothers assassinated.
  • Both assassinations show a second-gunman.
  • Both assassinations show Mafia involvement.
  • Both assassinations show multiple CIA connections.

And best of all…both assassinations were investigated by the FBI. And here we go…ready for this…as a result of the FBI investigations the FBI cleared the FBI and the CIA from any involvement in either assassination. Not just that…the FBI labeled anything other than the FBI’s official stories as nothing more than “conspiracy theories.” Ah, there you go…we can all rest easy now…nothing to see, move along. I feel better now, what about you?

So back to the original question…”Is the FBI really against Trump?”

Let’s hope not…I for one surely don’t think so.

Related Articles –

 

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Q&A: California Wildfires

Posted on by

Q: (name withheld)

Given your quals why have you not commented on the California fires? Seems like you should have. I know for a fact that you never lost a home when you were on a national incident management team for over 5 years.

 

A: Well, so many folks are talking about it, there isn’t much more to say. Yeah, people need to sift and sort through the BS and the ignorance of what is being said. And of course balance what is being said against facts…without the emotions. Let me share a couple things with you…

First the “pros”:

  • The air resources are doing an amazing job! I love that they can work at night, something the Feds refuse to do. These guys can really do a lot of things that the folks on the ground can’t…and it shows.
  • Most of the boots on the ground are trying hard under terrible weather, fuel, and leadership conditions.
  • California prison inmate wildland firefighter crews are some of the best in the country. They are incredible folks, very dedicated, and extremely effective/productive. I place them on par with any Type 2 crew and as good as many Hot Shot crews. They are doing a great job!

The “cons”:

  • The California leadership is directly to blame for the this mess. Well, maybe 75% of the blame.
    • They destroyed water catchments to save dumbass 2” fish.
    • They destroyed dams so native tribes could fish for dinner.
    • They didn’t refill water reservoirs, proven by actual pictures of dry reservoirs.
    • They didn’t pre-order and stage firefighting resources prior to the event.
    • Their wildland firefighting training sucks! They waste(d) huge amounts of water, equipment, and manpower fighting fire that has no bearing (outcome) at all.
    • Before the fires began, but when they knew the weather was coming and knew they didn’t have sufficient water resources, they could have ordered literally hundreds of water trucks to roll with fire trucks providing much needed water supply.
    • Leaders cut the fire department budget significantly. Oh, and the fire department leadership just let it slide without a fight.
  • Homeowners share about 25% of the blame.
    • People built and bought homes in areas known for devastating wildfires.
    • They also neglected to take well-known measure to protect their properties.
    • They also repeatedly voted in city, county, and state politicians that were more interested in pampering illegal aliens than doing their job to protect and safeguard citizens.

The insurance companies were the only smart ones out of all of this mess. They saw what the problems were, how catastrophic it could be…and they tried to up policy rates that could protect the homeowners. But the radical leftist state government said no to rate increases. So the insurance companies canceled policies or pulled out of the state entirely. Very, very smart!!!! Why would they want to conduct business when they knew they would lose money? Lose BILLIONS of dollars!

On the other hand the state, country, and city leadership absolutely suck!!! The sheer amount of incompetence is staggering, almost unbelievable. ALL of that leadership ignored their basic job…to protect their citizens. Then again, maybe it isn’t incompetence at all. Maybe something far more sinister?

And let’s not leave out the feds. Look at the amount of federal land involved. The US Forest Service it unreal in their complete and total failure to manage forests. And that is a fact that has been known for decades. The USFS simply think they know what is best and ignore both nature and science when it comes to their forest management…and the results are catastrophic fires for nearly 100 years.

Then there is CalFire and LAFD…pathetic. It is well-known in the wildland firefighting community that CalFire is both arrogant and incompetent. I know this firsthand. This topic could be a 10,000 word article itself. Their work ethic sucks and their leadership is some of the worst in the country…probably the worst. LAFD turned down an offer by FDNY to help with fire management. Big deal? Yup! Post-9/11 FDNY spent 10’s of millions of dollars on incident training…some of them I helped train. NYFD turned out to be some of the best incident management leaders I’ve seen in fire departments and they know incident management! So LAFD turns down the offer…arrogance at its worst.

Consider this…the catastrophic fires happening now is just the first stage. Next will come the lack of ability of most homeowners to pay their mortgage payments since they have no home to live in and have to find other living arrangements. About 10,000 homes have been destroyed so far…they will all have to find somewhere else to live…and that will cost them huge amounts of rent money. So most won’t be able to pay their mortgages…they will lose their homes to the banks.

Those who do try to pay for both rent and their mortgages will get hit with their property tax bill. And in that county about 65% of the assessed value for tax purposes is based on the land NOT the structure. So many of the homeowners will lose their property to the county.

Those who can survive all of that will then attempt to rebuild will find builders/contractors charging HUGE amounts of money to build due to supply and demand. And it will cost even more based on California building codes that will now affect new construction. How many folks, or rather which folks, will be able to afford that?

And let’s not forget all the infrastructure that will need to be rebuilt…roads, water lines, sewers, bridges, power lines, streets, etc. Who pays for all of that?

And the state’s fire insurance fund (California Wildfire Fund) is woefully underfunded and won’t come close to covering the loses of the current fires. The current estimate of loses in now about $300,000,000,000 ($300 billion), the fund won’t cover a fraction of that. So where does the money come from to cover the loses?

Oh, let’s not forget that their governor cut $100,000,000 from the state’s fire prevention budget. And LA cut about $20,000,000 from the fire department budget. Why do you think this is? And where did all that money go?

Folks, the fires currently burning is just the first stage/phase of the disaster, the unfathomable catastrophe, that is taking place in California…and it is all self-inflicted.

When investigating a crime you ask a number of questions:

  • Why did it happen now?
  • Who benefits from it?
  • Where did/does the money go?

Interesting questions…that no one in leadership will ask or respond to. And certainly none of the radical left-wing media in California will touch those basic questions.

What will be interesting is the outcome of the official After Action Review. Watch how they will word it. The blame, at least the emphasis, will be on weather, fuels, terrain, and lack of funding. No one, not a single person, will ever be held accountable or even the slightest amount of blame placed at anyone’s feet. Well, unless of course someone is the designated ‘fall guy’.

I don’t think most folks understand just how serious this situation really is…and how financially devastating this will be, not just for California…but the entire country.

Personal Note –

The person asking the question knows me personally. I withheld their name. For clarification…I served for over 5 years on an national wildfire incident management team. I worked in the Operations Section as a Division Supervisor and Structure Protection Specialist. And they are correct…I never lost a house while we were in charge of a fire. FWIW…I was also deployed to Australia over 15 years ago for 2 months to help with their historic fire season. In 1998 I was on the fire in Florida that threatened an entire county and destroyed a good part of it. So yeah, a bit of experience to draw my opinions on.

 

 

 2009 - 2025 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

FBI Crime Figures – USA is Safe!

Posted on by

In response to my article “SitRep – 10/3/2024 (real one)” I received this little tidbit…

  • According to the FBI your crime figures are way off to the point of mis-information. Stop it!

Oh my goodness…a true Kool-Aid drinker! Yes, I am inferring you are just shy of being clinically brain dead. And…obviously a Progressive leftist Trump hater. Or are you just a law enforcement authoritarian lackey?

Dang! Enough of my insulting, albeit probably true identifiers. If I hurt your feelings…well…oh well 🙂

Let me give you a visual first…

 


Now, some serious details…

  • Los Angles, a crime infested illegal alien haven…LA didn’t report crime data to be used in the FBI report. In 1985 LA city council adopted a resolution declaring Los Angeles a city of sanctuary for immigrants fleeing political persecution and violence.
  • New York, a crime infested illegal alien haven…NYPD didn’t report crime data to be used in the FBI report. Oh, and NYPD released stats showing 75% of their arrests are now illegal aliens. And yes, New York City is a sanctuary city for criminal illegal aliens.
  • Phoenix and Philadelphia, both terribly violent and crime ridden cities didn’t report any data.
  • LACSO, OCSO, San Francisco PD, PBCSO, SCSO, LCSO, Omaha PD, Miami PD, Oakland PD, New Orleans PD didn’t report any data.
  • Literally dozens and dozens of law enforcement agencies from all around the country didn’t report any data to be used in the FBI crime report.Many others only reported partial crimes stats.

So go right ahead and believe the FBI !! They never, ever lie about anything…do they? Oh wait…I didn’t ask that question correctly. The FBI never, ever tells the truth about anything…do they?

Yup, just more government propaganda that continually streams from federal law enforcement agencies. CORRECTION…just more government propaganda that continually streams from the entire US federal government.

Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Q&A: I’m done with it!

Posted on by

So a number of questions have been posed from my article “I’m done with it!” I will take a quick shot at them…

  • Q: What is “it”? please explain.

A: I kinda went into that in the article when I pointed out the craziness going on. Well actually, more like I’m done with tolerating the craziness. Well, I could include stupidity along with it. Dang, a little more difficult to define for you than I imagined. Let me think about it for a couple of days and see if I can do better explaining it. In the meantime think “1984” and that might help to understand what I am referring to. If you are a spiritual/religious person think of the scripture that refers to being “in the world but not of the world.”

  • Q: So what are you going to do about it now?

A: I assume you are talking about my plan or intentions on how to deal with all the craziness. Correct me if I am wrong. If I read you right…I am going to decline answering detailed specifics for personal and OpSec purposes. But generally speaking…

    • I am going to go down the 7 Common and make sure I am where I need to be.
    • I am going to pray like crazy on what else I should be doing.
    • I am going to seek out ways to help others that are in need and who sincerely need my help.
    • I am going to keep my Situational Awareness on ‘high’ for the foreseeable future.
    • I am going to narrow my focus on what I write about on the website to make sure I am following the Spirit on what I pass on.
    • I am going to do my best to keep “peace” at the forefront of everything I do.
    • I am going to take time to be still and listen.
  • Q: What does this have to do with WW2 families?

A: Yeah sorry, maybe I didn’t hit that as much as I should have. In Europe in the 1930’s Hitler and Nazi Germany made it pretty clear what they were all about, what they were going to do, and who it was going to affect. By the fall of 1939 it was clear as a bell…if a person was actually paying attention. By 1941 the death camps began their grisly business. And yet many Jews, as well as others, still didn’t flee Germany for safety. Hitler wrote “Mein Kampf” in the 1920’s so there was no misunderstandings. Nazis began burning books in the early 1930’s. In 1933 Nazis began arresting groups of people en mass. In 1938 Hitler ordered Nazis to began a new program starting with the “Night of Broken Glass”. They violently attacked German and Austrian Jews, the attacks also included the actual destruction of synagogues and Jewish owned stores, they arrested Jewish men, they vandalized of homes of Jewish families, and murdered individuals. And yet many Jews, as well as others, still didn’t flee Germany while there was still a chance. They were blind to what was happening around them…or hoped it wouldn’t affect them. Millions of men, women, children, and babies died due to poor Situational Awareness and lack of taking appropriate action. In the USA we are also seeing a pathetic blindness, poor Situational Awareness, and lack of taking appropriate action. I have a deep feeling in my gut where this ends up…and it ain’t good.

  • Q: Do you really and honestly feel or think the government controls us every minute of the day?

A: Yes. Maybe not the way you may be thinking. But, tell when when you are not under the control, regulation, monitoring/observation of the government…or living within the boundaries they set…and being taxed by them? And by “government” I mean at all levels, not just the federal government. Provide me examples if you are so sure that I am wrong.

  • Q: Are you saying it is time for you to revolt or for the entire country should start a violent revolution?

A: Now there is a loaded question…almost dangling bait out there for me. Let me be clear…crystal clear…I am advocating for myself to stand up for righteousness, I am saying I will try to be bold for eternal truths, I am saying I will try and do everything within the law and according to God-given rights to try and fix the system to help people. I am saying I will help others…serve others actually…when I can, even if it isn’t convenient. I am saying pray about what you should do. This is a very personal fight for each individual person. There is only one way to go about this…as an individual, based on prayer and what the Spirit tells you to do…with PEACE in your heart.

  • Q: Shouldn’t we have a strong military or should we be without one?

A: I am saying this; 1) our military should be in accordance with the Constitution, 2) we should not be involved with entangling alliances as our Founders warned us against in respect to our military, 3) we should only go to war in self-defense, defending our families, our homes, our freedoms/rights/liberties, 4) when absolutely necessary we can and should defend those who can’t defend themselves (i.e. WW2). We should not; 1) nation build, 2) spread democracy, 3) fight wars in other countries so we don’t have to fight them here, 4) be defending other countries, that is their job. There is no country on this earth that could successfully invade, defeat, and overthrow the United States…and they all know it. The main enemies we have are within our own borders…mostly in Washington DC. To fix this we need to do four main things; 1) give up our war-mongering ways, 2) abide by the Constitution, 3) eliminate the military-industrial complex, 4) not bow the knee to the global and ruling elites (i.e. NATO, IMF, UN, etc.).

Related Articles –
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted Assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #3

Posted on by

  • What about the secret service sniper that released that he was ordered not to kill the shooter until after he had fired at former president Trump?

I believe you are referring to the Willis tweet if I am not mistaken. Let’s look at that one with open eyes and a questioning mind. First, he claims the head of the SS was the “shoot / no shoot” decision maker, meaning Director Kimberly Cheatle. That is HIGHLY unlikely. Why? He would more than likely refer to her as “Director” since that is her title…not “head of the secret service”. Next, unless there was some HUGE overriding reason, the Director would not be the “shoot / no shoot” decision maker. It would be left in the hands of the sniper, or, in the hands of the on-scene person directly in-charge of the event detail (Incident Commander) or the person in charge of on-scene Operations.

He also claims he was arrested but doesn’t state who did the arrest or on what charges. The SS would not have arrested him, that would create a public record for one, but the chances of the SS getting clearance to do so would have required developing what to charge him with. That would be no simple task and would probably require DOJ interaction, or, at the very least SS lawyers. Also, the chances of the SS arresting one of their own that quickly would be unlikely. He claims he was interviewed by the FBI, probably true since they would want his story/information to further their investigation. He also claims he was fired. Not really possible at that point. To fire a Federal employee takes some doing and is almost impossible…and truly impossible to do so quickly.

To me this story sounds about 90% untrue by reason, logic, and factual evidence…as I am aware of such. The final tidbit that makes me question this is the fact it happened so quickly and so publicly. You have to remember, that for the most part, the federal government is very, very incompetent. That is one of the reasons it takes them so long to do just about anything. And the amount of scrutiny that this would bring, think ‘publicity’, would be damning to say the least. It would be WAY too clear that this was an ‘inside job’…and I don’t see TPTB making such a blunder.

Now, could it be true? I give it a 10% chance that it is entirely true, or 15% chance that it is partially, true…but no more than that in either case.

  • Why didn’t that local officer kill the shooter when he had a chance?

I believe you are referring to the report that Butler Township officers received word that there was a man on the roof. Reports state that he was hoisted to the roof by another officer but that officer was targeted by the shooter. The officer then retreated for his own safety. The shooter then at that point opened fire on Trump. At least that is my understanding of the report/story.

Here is my take:

If Butler Township officers received those reports, protocol would have them relay that information to the Unified Command Command Post (CP). At that point the communications people would have put that out over the air and the SS snipers (technically called counter-snipers) would have been in the loop on that notification. The SS snipers would have immediately recon’d the building’s roof, and seeing a man with a gun would have engaged. I can’t imagine that Butler Township officers, once receiving the reports would not have reported it up-line.

Also, the retreating officer did what 99% of all officers would have done…retreated under the threat of his own life. Only the most dedicated, the most trained, and the most committed officers would have engaged at the threat of their own life.

Here is the kicker…let’s say this is all true for this conversation. If the reports were actually given to the Butler Township officers, and they reported it up-line, and the CP relayed that information over their ComNet, and the SS snipers received the broadcast, and the SS snipers saw the shooter engaging the Butler Township officer, the SS snipers would have fired right then and there killing the shooter and not waiting on a “shoot / no shoot” from command. Right?

So work it backwards…we know the SS sniper did not engage the shooter until after the shooter fired multiple rounds. Meaning; 1) they didn’t see the shooter/officer engagement, or 2) didn’t receive any notification of the shooter on the roof, 3) or??? Next; 1) the CP didn’t receive the report from the Butler Township officers and therefore didn’t put it out over the ComNet, or 2) the CP received the report from the Butler Township officers but chose to not put it out over the ComNet for whatever reasons. Next; 1) the Butler Township officers never received the report(s) from civilians, or 2) they received the report(s) and chose not to relay the info up-line and investigate the situation themselves, or 3) they received the report(s), relayed it up-line and then investigated.

Remember, I was a federal employee for 16 years, I’ve worked hundreds of incidents with other federal employees, including incidents where state and local resources were involved. My experience tells me that incompetence ruled that day in this situation, if it is true; meaning, the sheer amount of incompetence in these situations in mind-blowing. Also, the theory of Occam’s Razor points to incompetence as the likely reason this huge lapse of action/judgment happened.

However, this question must be considered…Is the story itself true or not to begin with? Also, are there parts of the story true and other parts not true?

Related Articles:
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Attempted Assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #2

Posted on by

  • Do you think the assassination attempt was “allowed” to happen?

I am not sure exactly what you mean by “allowed”. If you mean the Secret Service was behind it…I have no reliable and verified evidence or knowledge that is the case. And, I haven’t heard anyone who has any valid and reliable information that they were.

The sheer number of SS agents that would be in the loop on such a plot would be pretty large. And that would tell me that there is a high likelihood that someone would object and potentially whistleblow. Also, I can’t imagine all those that would have to be involved could collectively keep their mouths shut. But that does open up another train of thought.

According to the laws of logic…

Based on the actions/reactions of the SS agents on scene it is obvious that the entire operation was a failure from the beginning. Meaning, the shooter’s building wasn’t cleared and then secured. As people saw the shooter climbing the building and getting into position they reported it to law enforcement…and law enforcement didn’t take action to stop him. At least 2 SS snipers were looking in his exact direction for 3 – 4 minutes prior to the shooter opening fire and took no action until the shooter got off 4 – 8 rounds.

Once Trump was shot and down it should not have taken the SS more than 60 seconds at most to be moving him into the armored car…they took much much longer than that. The whole idea of numerous agents surrounding a protectee is to provide a human shield against the protectee being shot again, whether by the original shooter or additional shooters. If you look at the SS agents as they are moving Trump they leave Trump wide open for a second shooter to score direct hits center mass or head shots. That should never ever have happened by anyone even remotely qualified to be executive protection detail members.

I’ve already mentioned the female agent who played with her sunglasses multiple times while Trump was being moved. Of course she should have, they were probably multi-hundred dollar Oakly’s! Gotta maintain that cool SS look, right? What was really cute was another female SS agent at the armored vehicle as Trump was being placed inside, she is trying to holster her weapon. Ah, about 12 tries later she gave up and went back into a bad-ass low ready position…looking dazed and confused. Muscle memory should have gotten her weapon holstered the first time. That tells me she is seriously deficient in training. And that is verified by ALL the SS agents actions trying to move Trump…it was a clown show.

So what does logic have to do with it? Simple…you implied that the SS might have allowed it to happen. I provided logical information that probably wasn’t the case. If SS agents didn’t allow it to happen is then true, then the opposing facts are true…the SS was entirely incompetent in that operation. Both can’t be true…unless of course the incompetence was feigned to allow all of the failures to line up and result is catastrophe. But that would oppose the theory of Occam’s Razor.

This is called the Swiss Cheese model of event/accident causation, it is a model used in risk analysis and risk management (a.k.a. “Cumulative Act Effect”). Basically all the failures line up and create the catastrophic failure effect. Meaning no person, or not enough persons, takes action to prevent the catastrophic failure event/accident. You can read more about this concept and methodology < click here >

As for the female agents…before someone goes off on me…let me give you more ammunition. If you watch the videos you can see that the female agents are all but useless when trying to shield Trump…they aren’t large enough and never in a useful position. As Trump is being moved the female agents appear “lost”. As they are putting Trump into the vehicle the female agents once again just kinda wander around unable to perform any meaningful actions. And here is the great thing about that…the SS has a goal that by 2030 30% of all protective field agents are designated to be female. Yeah, let’s not go for the best of qualified folks to be agents, oh no…let’s identify new agents simply based upon gender as a qualification. Then you wonder why the SS has lost credibility and respect and can longer adequately perform their duties…for decades.

  • What is the strangest part of all this?

That is a fantastic question, thank you! Oddly for me it really is disassociated directly from the shooting itself. In my last article “How is this to blame on Biden?” I relayed the information when Biden put the “bullseye” on Trump. That statement was made during a private phone conference with multiple Democrat Party mega-donors. So his “bullseye” statement is bad enough…sounds like ordering a hit. But, what I find most interesting…who leaked that information and why?

Wouldn’t you think that all those on the phone call were party loyalists who are big-time donors, and/or Biden staff. And wouldn’t they then want to protect Biden from that kind of legal and publicity damning spot-light? So why was the info leaked, eh? Oh, come on…you know why.

  • The FBI was investigating the shooting, why is the DHS now investigating as well?

The FBI is normally the lead agency (Agency Having Jurisdiction) when it comes to these matters of current and former federal employees/politicians. The DHS is normally the Agency Having Jurisdiction when it comes to domestic terrorism events.

A case could be made that this is just inter-agency rivalry and agencies flexing their muscles to maintain their territory. Or, a case could be made that now that this is branded an act of domestic terrorism ANY and ALL information that is gathered is now classified at the highest standards. And that means it more than likely doesn’t get released…ever.

How convenient, eh?

Related Articles:
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

GREAT question!!

Posted on by

  • From: xpansan

Would that question be, what are the rest of the world leaders, particularly China, Russia and North Korea, thinking of last nights debate?

That was not the question I was thinking…but it is a GREAT question!!

I would love to hear what you think.

For me…I can only imagine! The Tier 1 countries are probably laughing their butts off thinking how stupid we are for electing/selecting Biden. The most powerful country in the world whose President can’t tie his own shoes…or even know what shoes are. We are a joke to them.

For our enemies…they have to be shaking their heads wondering why we would want to be run by a clown…a fool that can’t put a full sentence together…a man who wears Depends coz he craps himself in public.

For the third-world countries…they are probably saying, “Welcome to the club US!!”

Now…in regards to the possibility of Trump being President…dang! The world’s countries’ leadership probably are worried coz they never know for sure what he might do…about anything. And that is not necessarily a bad thing. Our enemies are probably just saying to themselves and each other…”Crap!”

As for the actual, true leaders of the world…I don’t know what they are thinking for Trump. But for Biden I am sure they smile to themselves and know they completely control him…and thus the USA.

Related Articles:
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Who would be the Dem nominee?

Posted on by

  • From: TM

If Biden is out, who would be the Dem nominee?

  • From: Michael

YES YES YES. 100% yes. That is exactly why they pushed the debate early in the process – so they could replace him. So the public could truly see that he is not able to run and “lead” the country. Not only did Biden take himself out of the running, the members of the left will demand it be done “for the good of Biden and the country”. They planned on replacing him, but this was the key to allowing it to be done “effortlessly”. Now…who will the replacement be? Hillary? Michael (sorry, Michelle)? Newsom (I highly doubt this one)?

That is a tricky question to be sure. I can’t read the minds of the Democrat Party masters. From a purely political perspective I would think that Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, and Cory Booker would all be in the top tier running.

I don’t think that Hillary Clinton would be their nominee at all. I just don’t see it; too old, too controversial, too easy to hate, to overshadowed by Bill, and she can’t resist making a fool of herself when she speaks.

I don’t think Kamala Harris would be their nominee either. She is dumb as a rock…sorry about the insult to rocks. There are far too many video clips out there of her making a complete and total fool of herself. And I don’t think she is well liked within the Democrat Party either.

I think the outlier to watch out for, a valid dark horse contender to not be ignored…Michelle Obama. I could see the Dems begging for her to save the election, to save the country…and she would have to accept…it would be her civic duty to save the world.

But my guesses are all based on politics…not on power. Remember I said that Biden wouldn’t be the nominee in 2020…I sure did get that wrong! The problem…again, I was thinking politics not power.

What I mean by that is the power behind the curtain wanted an easily controlled tool as President. Someone that they could force to do their bidding, not Biden’s…and certainly not what is best for the country. In that light…Biden was the perfect choice…and I missed it not thinking “power”.

And here is a “gotcha”…If the power people still want a tool/fool…why not have Biden elected/selected again!? He fades away…and the Vice-President steps in. Interesting thought, eh?

Related Articles:
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

Posted on by

  • From: TM

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

I am so glad you asked 🙂  I wanted you to work for it.

No one…and I mean no one expected Biden to do well in a debate with Trump. Okay, maybe Biden himself thought he would do well but he has dementia.

So why did Biden’s handlers and masters allow him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose? Actually, the question should be…

”Why did Biden’s handlers and masters make him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose?”

By default Biden was the Democrat Party nominee…period. He is the sitting President, that gives him the right to it…it was his to turn-down or not. And he didn’t turn it down…he expected to be, demanded to be, the Democrat Party nominee for the 2024 Presidential election cycle.

Could the party take him out of the running? No, plain and simple…it would wreck the party.

So it fell to Biden’s handlers and masters to take him out of the running…to open the door for another nominee. There was absolutely no need for them to try and talk him out of the nomination…it would create too much stress and tension within the party and diminish the power of the handlers and masters by putting them into the position of convincing him…or even discussing it with him.

The answer…go along with him, make him feel important, keep the party together…and let Biden take Biden out of the running. And Biden did just that at the debate…he effectively removed himself as the Democrat Party presidential nominee.

How do I know that?

Don’t listen to the Republican/Conservative talking heads and politicians on how the debate went. Listen closely to what the Democrats are saying about Biden’s debate performance. Especially important are what the Democrat Party insiders are saying…the true power players. Without exception they are all saying they are worried about his debate performance; but they are also clearly voicing their concerns about his ability to beat Trump in the election.

Remember David Axelrod, Democrat Party operative and Obama handler? Well, Axelrod publicly stated “If, for whatever reason, there’s a change at the top of the ticket, you guys are in trouble with Donald Trump. Because the guy who was up there tonight is not a guy who’s going to inspire people.” That is Biden’s political death sentence.

Don’t get me wrong…the real power behind the Democrat Party was never going to let Biden be the nominee…they just had to decide on the right way to kick him to the curb. And they did that Thursday, June 27th, 2024. Well played!

Related Articles:
Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p