Attempted Assassination of Trump: Q&A – Part #2

  • Do you think the assassination attempt was “allowed” to happen?

I am not sure exactly what you mean by “allowed”. If you mean the Secret Service was behind it…I have no reliable and verified evidence or knowledge that is the case. And, I haven’t heard anyone who has any valid and reliable information that they were.

The sheer number of SS agents that would be in the loop on such a plot would be pretty large. And that would tell me that there is a high likelihood that someone would object and potentially whistleblow. Also, I can’t imagine all those that would have to be involved could collectively keep their mouths shut. But that does open up another train of thought.

According to the laws of logic…

Based on the actions/reactions of the SS agents on scene it is obvious that the entire operation was a failure from the beginning. Meaning, the shooter’s building wasn’t cleared and then secured. As people saw the shooter climbing the building and getting into position they reported it to law enforcement…and law enforcement didn’t take action to stop him. At least 2 SS snipers were looking in his exact direction for 3 – 4 minutes prior to the shooter opening fire and took no action until the shooter got off 4 – 8 rounds.

Once Trump was shot and down it should not have taken the SS more than 60 seconds at most to be moving him into the armored car…they took much much longer than that. The whole idea of numerous agents surrounding a protectee is to provide a human shield against the protectee being shot again, whether by the original shooter or additional shooters. If you look at the SS agents as they are moving Trump they leave Trump wide open for a second shooter to score direct hits center mass or head shots. That should never ever have happened by anyone even remotely qualified to be executive protection detail members.

I’ve already mentioned the female agent who played with her sunglasses multiple times while Trump was being moved. Of course she should have, they were probably multi-hundred dollar Oakly’s! Gotta maintain that cool SS look, right? What was really cute was another female SS agent at the armored vehicle as Trump was being placed inside, she is trying to holster her weapon. Ah, about 12 tries later she gave up and went back into a bad-ass low ready position…looking dazed and confused. Muscle memory should have gotten her weapon holstered the first time. That tells me she is seriously deficient in training. And that is verified by ALL the SS agents actions trying to move Trump…it was a clown show.

So what does logic have to do with it? Simple…you implied that the SS might have allowed it to happen. I provided logical information that probably wasn’t the case. If SS agents didn’t allow it to happen is then true, then the opposing facts are true…the SS was entirely incompetent in that operation. Both can’t be true…unless of course the incompetence was feigned to allow all of the failures to line up and result is catastrophe. But that would oppose the theory of Occam’s Razor.

This is called the Swiss Cheese model of event/accident causation, it is a model used in risk analysis and risk management (a.k.a. “Cumulative Act Effect”). Basically all the failures line up and create the catastrophic failure effect. Meaning no person, or not enough persons, takes action to prevent the catastrophic failure event/accident. You can read more about this concept and methodology < click here >

As for the female agents…before someone goes off on me…let me give you more ammunition. If you watch the videos you can see that the female agents are all but useless when trying to shield Trump…they aren’t large enough and never in a useful position. As Trump is being moved the female agents appear “lost”. As they are putting Trump into the vehicle the female agents once again just kinda wander around unable to perform any meaningful actions. And here is the great thing about that…the SS has a goal that by 2030 30% of all protective field agents are designated to be female. Yeah, let’s not go for the best of qualified folks to be agents, oh no…let’s identify new agents simply based upon gender as a qualification. Then you wonder why the SS has lost credibility and respect and can longer adequately perform their duties…for decades.

  • What is the strangest part of all this?

That is a fantastic question, thank you! Oddly for me it really is disassociated directly from the shooting itself. In my last article “How is this to blame on Biden?” I relayed the information when Biden put the “bullseye” on Trump. That statement was made during a private phone conference with multiple Democrat Party mega-donors. So his “bullseye” statement is bad enough…sounds like ordering a hit. But, what I find most interesting…who leaked that information and why?

Wouldn’t you think that all those on the phone call were party loyalists who are big-time donors, and/or Biden staff. And wouldn’t they then want to protect Biden from that kind of legal and publicity damning spot-light? So why was the info leaked, eh? Oh, come on…you know why.

  • The FBI was investigating the shooting, why is the DHS now investigating as well?

The FBI is normally the lead agency (Agency Having Jurisdiction) when it comes to these matters of current and former federal employees/politicians. The DHS is normally the Agency Having Jurisdiction when it comes to domestic terrorism events.

A case could be made that this is just inter-agency rivalry and agencies flexing their muscles to maintain their territory. Or, a case could be made that now that this is branded an act of domestic terrorism ANY and ALL information that is gathered is now classified at the highest standards. And that means it more than likely doesn’t get released…ever.

How convenient, eh?


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

GREAT question!!

  • From: xpansan

Would that question be, what are the rest of the world leaders, particularly China, Russia and North Korea, thinking of last nights debate?

That was not the question I was thinking…but it is a GREAT question!!

I would love to hear what you think.

For me…I can only imagine! The Tier 1 countries are probably laughing their butts off thinking how stupid we are for electing/selecting Biden. The most powerful country in the world whose President can’t tie his own shoes…or even know what shoes are. We are a joke to them.

For our enemies…they have to be shaking their heads wondering why we would want to be run by a clown…a fool that can’t put a full sentence together…a man who wears Depends coz he craps himself in public.

For the third-world countries…they are probably saying, “Welcome to the club US!!”

Now…in regards to the possibility of Trump being President…dang! The world’s countries’ leadership probably are worried coz they never know for sure what he might do…about anything. And that is not necessarily a bad thing. Our enemies are probably just saying to themselves and each other…”Crap!”

As for the actual, true leaders of the world…I don’t know what they are thinking for Trump. But for Biden I am sure they smile to themselves and know they completely control him…and thus the USA.


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Who would be the Dem nominee?

  • From: TM

If Biden is out, who would be the Dem nominee?

  • From: Michael

YES YES YES. 100% yes. That is exactly why they pushed the debate early in the process – so they could replace him. So the public could truly see that he is not able to run and “lead” the country. Not only did Biden take himself out of the running, the members of the left will demand it be done “for the good of Biden and the country”. They planned on replacing him, but this was the key to allowing it to be done “effortlessly”. Now…who will the replacement be? Hillary? Michael (sorry, Michelle)? Newsom (I highly doubt this one)?

That is a tricky question to be sure. I can’t read the minds of the Democrat Party masters. From a purely political perspective I would think that Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, and Cory Booker would all be in the top tier running.

I don’t think that Hillary Clinton would be their nominee at all. I just don’t see it; too old, too controversial, too easy to hate, to overshadowed by Bill, and she can’t resist making a fool of herself when she speaks.

I don’t think Kamala Harris would be their nominee either. She is dumb as a rock…sorry about the insult to rocks. There are far too many video clips out there of her making a complete and total fool of herself. And I don’t think she is well liked within the Democrat Party either.

I think the outlier to watch out for, a valid dark horse contender to not be ignored…Michelle Obama. I could see the Dems begging for her to save the election, to save the country…and she would have to accept…it would be her civic duty to save the world.

But my guesses are all based on politics…not on power. Remember I said that Biden wouldn’t be the nominee in 2020…I sure did get that wrong! The problem…again, I was thinking politics not power.

What I mean by that is the power behind the curtain wanted an easily controlled tool as President. Someone that they could force to do their bidding, not Biden’s…and certainly not what is best for the country. In that light…Biden was the perfect choice…and I missed it not thinking “power”.

And here is a “gotcha”…If the power people still want a tool/fool…why not have Biden elected/selected again!? He fades away…and the Vice-President steps in. Interesting thought, eh?


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

  • From: TM

So exactly what is the most important question altogether?

I am so glad you asked 🙂  I wanted you to work for it.

No one…and I mean no one expected Biden to do well in a debate with Trump. Okay, maybe Biden himself thought he would do well but he has dementia.

So why did Biden’s handlers and masters allow him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose? Actually, the question should be…

”Why did Biden’s handlers and masters make him to go on stage with Trump in a debate they knew he would lose?”

By default Biden was the Democrat Party nominee…period. He is the sitting President, that gives him the right to it…it was his to turn-down or not. And he didn’t turn it down…he expected to be, demanded to be, the Democrat Party nominee for the 2024 Presidential election cycle.

Could the party take him out of the running? No, plain and simple…it would wreck the party.

So it fell to Biden’s handlers and masters to take him out of the running…to open the door for another nominee. There was absolutely no need for them to try and talk him out of the nomination…it would create too much stress and tension within the party and diminish the power of the handlers and masters by putting them into the position of convincing him…or even discussing it with him.

The answer…go along with him, make him feel important, keep the party together…and let Biden take Biden out of the running. And Biden did just that at the debate…he effectively removed himself as the Democrat Party presidential nominee.

How do I know that?

Don’t listen to the Republican/Conservative talking heads and politicians on how the debate went. Listen closely to what the Democrats are saying about Biden’s debate performance. Especially important are what the Democrat Party insiders are saying…the true power players. Without exception they are all saying they are worried about his debate performance; but they are also clearly voicing their concerns about his ability to beat Trump in the election.

Remember David Axelrod, Democrat Party operative and Obama handler? Well, Axelrod publicly stated “If, for whatever reason, there’s a change at the top of the ticket, you guys are in trouble with Donald Trump. Because the guy who was up there tonight is not a guy who’s going to inspire people.” That is Biden’s political death sentence.

Don’t get me wrong…the real power behind the Democrat Party was never going to let Biden be the nominee…they just had to decide on the right way to kick him to the curb. And they did that Thursday, June 27th, 2024. Well played!


Related Articles:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Okay, okay…just a couple Presidential Debate thoughts.

  • From: TM

No, you don’t get off that easy! What did you think of the debate?

Okay, okay…just a couple thoughts.

Let’s take the easy one first…Biden. His lights were almost totally off. When they did come on, they flickered, at best. Come on, Joe Biden is 81 years old…a very, very old man for the job he supposedly is doing. On the debate stage he acted like an 81 year old man with mid-stage dementia…which he has been diagnosed with. His confusion, mumbling, fumbling, freezing, disorientation was all symptomatic of his age and his dementia. I would like to say he lied about most everything. But, I could see in his very diminished mental state he believed what he was saying. For his age Biden did fairly well. Overall, for the office he supposedly holds…he was a complete and total disaster. Actually, he is extremely dangerous for the country considering the power he could wield should his handlers allow it.

Now Trump. Well, Trump is Trump is Trump. He came across as a narcissist…borderline megalomaniac . He is a man who talked/attacked with a large club vs any style or eloquence. Most of the time he avoided the moderator’s direct question and bloviated on how he is so great, so wonderful, so smart, so tough, so strong, better than anyone at everything. He should have addressed the question(s) directly and then commented on Biden’s issues that he brought up. He missed so many opportunities to talk policy and plans, discouraging. He made it WAY to personal…but that is Trump, it is all about him.

I was pleasantly surprised at the CNN moderators…they did a decent job for who they are and who they work for. I am not going to disparage them because I don’t think they deserve it.

But you missed the most important question altogether.


Related Article:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

Do you think qualified immunity or training is more to blame for LEO problems today?

  • From: Anonymous

Do you think qualified immunity or training is more to blame for LEO problems today?


Really, really good question! Let’s tackle your question as two separate ones.

When it comes to “qualified immunity” it is interesting to note its origins. Qualified immunity actually protects government officials from all but the most egregious of their crimes. Yes, qualified immunity protects cops from accountability for most of their criminal and unconstitutional behavior. Qualified immunity is legal protection for government officials in the performance of their duties; normally, discretionary duties. But qualified immunity derives from absolute immunity. Absolute immunity provides complete immunity from criminal prosecution and suits for damages, so long as government officials are acting within the scope of their duties. Meaning they are doing what they have been trained to do so they can get away with virtually anything as long as they can justify it as what they were trained to do.

Hang in there with me…absolute immunity comes directly from the legal principle of sovereign immunity. Meaning, sovereign immunity is a legal doctrine whereby a government cannot commit a legal wrong and is immune from civil suit or criminal prosecution. And guess where that concept came from? The rule of kings, monarchs, or dictators over countries and its citizens with absolute power.

So the concept of qualified immunity come from the legal principle of allowing government officials almost complete legal immunity for monetary damages originating from their bad/criminal/unconstitutional behavior.

All of this means that cops can do as they please knowing full well they will probably not be held monetarily or criminally liable for their actions. Cops are normally only held accountable when their most heinous actions become public…and then only if those actions can’t be covered up.

Interesting to note that federal cops enjoy a much higher level of qualified and absolute immunity protection based on the DOJ having a broad interpretation of sovereign immunity.

Did you pick up on that? It is the DOJ for federal cops must prosecute, state Attorney Generals’ offices, or local prosecuting attorneys must bring criminal charges against non-federal cops. And how likely do you think that is going to be common…bringing charges against those you work closely with?

So yes, qualified immunity for cops is a HUGE problem. It gives cops an arrogant swagger to treat people virtually as they wish…knowing they will probably never be held liable.

Moving on to training…oh, boy. In the US the average cop trainee spends about 20 weeks in formal training before hitting the streets. Sounds good to you? Well, in the developed world (100 top developed countries) we rank at the bottom part of that list for police officer training. For example: 1) Finland requires almost 7 times more training (5,500 hours vs 800 hrs), 2) Australia requires nearly 4.5 times more training (3,500 hours vs 800 hours). And many of those developed countries require an academic degree whereas the US normally only requires a GED.


Hey, did you know that less than 37% of high school 12th graders reached or exceeded the academic preparedness benchmarks for both math and reading. And police trainees only need a GED?????


Couple of interesting facts:

  • Police trainees spend 5 times more hours on firearms/weapons training than deescalation training.
  • US police academies virtually ignore communication skills training.
  • In 2020 less than 50 cops were killed in the line of duty.
  • In 2020 civilians where shot dead 20 times more than cops, more than 10% of those civilians were unarmed.
  • 90% of all police calls are for non-violent issues.
  • Police trainees get only a couple of hours training on mental health self-care, if any. Cops are 5 times more likely to kill themselves than be killed by homicide on the job.
  • Police training expert states, “you see officers very rapidly escalating from initial communication to the actual physical use of force, because this is how they train.”
  • In the US, the escalation of force is at the discretion of the officer, whereas in countries such as Norway and Finland [and most other developed countries], there are more rigorous rules as to what is considered justified use of force.

About 1,000 civilians a year are killed by cops, that’s 35 people per 10million citizens. Doesn’t sound too bad, right?

In Canada it is 10 people per 10million citizens. In Australia it is 8 people per 10million citizens. In England it is 2 people per 10million citizens. In Japan/Norway/Iceland/New Zealand it is 0 – 2 people per 10million citizens. Is that an interesting statistic to you? And I wonder why it is so much lower in ALL other developed countries?

Just a couple more facts…training duration in police academies by state:

  • 11 weeks – GA
  • 12 weeks – MS, MN, ND, SC, TN
  • 13 weeks – AR, SD, WI
  • 14 weeks – KN, IL

Does that make you all warm and fuzzy…within 2 – 3 months brand new LEOs are released on the streets of at least 11 states armed with pistols, ARs, shotguns, mace, steel batons, and handcuffs. And these same brand new cops have been trained 10 times more on weapons and how to escalate use of force than how to deescalate non-violent interactions with civilians…or even ‘how’ to communicate with those they are to protect and serve. Oh man, I feel better already!

So is the training of police officers a problem in the US? Of course!! The facts speak for themselves. Their training, or extreme lack of it, is not just a danger to civilians but also a danger to the cops themselves.

Your question was…”Do you think qualified immunity or training is more to blame for LEO problems today?”

I think they are tied…for second place. They are both an obvious problem…very, very serious problems. But, in my opinion not the worst on the list of problems.

How often do we hear…”To Protect & Serve”???

In the US only about 18% of all reported property crimes are solved and only about 45% of all violent crimes are solved. So clearly US law enforcement agencies and law enforcement officers are near complete failures.

Now listen to this…in 2020 there were 6.5million property crimes reported in the US. Also in 2020 there was more than 1.6million violent crimes reported in the US. That is over 8million crimes for 330million US population. Oh, those are only the reported crimes…only about 40% of all violent crimes are reported to police and only about 32% of all property crimes are reported to police. So the real numbers are over 20million crimes against US citizens each year…that aren’t prevented.

So the average US citizen is likely to become a victim of a violent crime every 30 years…meaning raped, beat-up, or murdered…and far less than ½ of those crimes will ever be solved. And the average US citizen will be a victim of a property crime every 16 years and forget it ever being solved.

Think about those two stats for a minute…The average person in the US will live to 80 years of age. That works out like this…

  • You are likely to be the victim of a violent crime (raped, beat-up, or murdered) 2 – 3 times.
  • You are likely to be the victim of a property crime 5 times.

How is that whole “to protect & serve” thing working out for you!?!?

Back to what I think is the #1 problem…”Mission” !!!

I guess you could call it a problem with their culture as well as their mission. LEOs need to focus entirely on solving crimes…period! By solving crimes you will by default get to the “bad guys” in society…and they go to prison or get hung.

But do you think LEOs or their agencies will do that? Or, are they even capable of that kind of shift in culture / mission or mindset?

Ah, if they were capable of it, they would have done it by now don’t you think? Why else would those agencies tolerate being such utter failures at their job?

Then again…is it possible their ignoring of their responsibility to citizens and shift from peace officers to law enforcement officers over the last 65 years was by design?

Then again…think about this for a minute…if you wanted men and women concentrating on enforcing laws vs solving crimes and protecting citizens…I guess a great way to go about that would be to have poorly trained LEOs…and their limited training geared more towards using force with weapons against citizens than solving crimes.

Then I guess the next logical question to ask would be…what kind of people would want cops like that…and for what purpose?


Related Article:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.</p

How sure are you that there will be a stock market crash in 2025?

  • From: TM

How sure are you that there will be a stock market crash in 2025?

Great question, trick question, touchy question…difficult question.

Remember I use the risk management model for what I think is coming. That includes probability, severity, and timeline. You can learn more about that methodology by < clicking here >

When I look at past occurrences of market troubles here in the US it becomes apparent that any stock market issue here in the US ripples out globally pretty quickly. There is truth in the saying “when America sneezes, the world gets a cold.” To me, any stock market crash here in the US will be devastating to the US economy as a whole…and it would bring down the entire economic/financial system. That would spread worldwide quickly and with devastation. All that being said I would rate the severity aspect as ‘extreme’.

Now comes the tricky part…probability. Based on pure facts, 100% historical facts…there is a 100% probability that the US stock market will crash and the entire US economy along with it. Which goes first is another discussion, economy vs market. The ‘timeline’ to that probability is unknown in my opinion…but it will definitely happen. I am guessing within 10 – 25 years for sure.

But that doesn’t answer your question. Your specific ‘timeline’ qualifier changes the equation considerably.

Here are some factors that I am taking into consideration:

  • 2024 Presidential election

  • Two presidential candidates that appear to be polar opposites and the country split pretty evenly in their support

  • Current financial condition of the US economy

  • Here is one that I struggle to quantify…the elites lust for absolute power.

We all know that Biden is nothing more than a figure head, he is clearly not running the country, it is not possible for him to do so. He is close to entering the final stages of dementia and he is totally incapable of leading this administration. So there is a power structure behind him that is calling the shots and running the government…I call them the Elites.

Then you have Trump who has a very vocal and passionate base of support…along with a fair number of crazies in that bunch capable of just about anything. Trump’s legal problems are well-known and he is facing the real possibility of prison time. But I doubt that his base would sit-by and allow that to happen.

These campaign/election/selection issues make the country very, very unstable right now. That instability alone could tank the markets on any given day. But there is also the very real threat of the elites behind Biden using a crash as a tactic to forego, delay, or dramatically move the election/selection.

Taking all this into consideration there are several ‘timeline’ and ‘probability’ combinations between now and the end of 2025. It looks something like this:

Timeline = by election day / Probability = high (very high if is looks as if Biden will lose by a landslide)

Timeline = after election before inauguration / Probability = very high (if Trump wins)

Timeline = after election before inauguration / Probability = low (if Biden wins)

Timeline = between now and end of 2025 / Probability = moderately high (regardless of who wins)

Want to know what the “experts” are saying?

  • US market expert warns of ‘a bigger crash’ than 2008 — says there’s ‘nowhere to hide’ – 6/13/2024 AP MoneyWise
  • There’s a stock market crash coming in 2025 as the ‘bubble of all bubbles’ bursts – 6/10/2024 Business Insider
  • This Forecasting Tool Hasn’t Been Wrong in 65 Years, and It Has a Sobering Message for Wall Street – 5/12/2024 Motley Fool
  • From a 65% stock market crash to an imminent recession – 5/12/2024 Business Insider
  • 6 Risk Factors showing market crash coming – 5/8/2024 US News & World Report
  • Bubble of all bubbles, stock market crash of 2025, likely worse than 2008 – 6/12/2024 The Economic Times
  • A coming recession will send the S&P 500 plummeting more than 60% – 6/1/2024 Business Insider
  • US economist predicts 2025 stock market crash worse than 2008 – 6/12/2024 NewsBytes
  • Stock Market Crash Worse Than 2008 Crisis Coming In 2025 – 6/11/2024 NDTV
  • Is the Stock Market Going to Crash? 153 Years of Valuation History Weighs In and Provides a Big [yes] Clue – 6/16/2024 Motely Fool
  • There are two factors signaling a recession by year-end or early 2025, and stock market tumbling – 5/7/2024 – Business Insider
  • How far could America’s stock market fall? Crash – 4/25/2024 The Economist

Now, back to your question…

I am not confident that there will be a ‘crash’ by the end of 2025…according to my ‘gut feeling’. The operative word being ‘confident’. That being said…my head tells me that all the key economic indicators show that a crash by the end of 2025 is virtually unavoidable. And there are plenty of ‘experts’ to back that up. So there is a serious conflict for me on what will happen. Then add in the whole election/selection thing and it gets real cloudy.

So what to do?

You have to make up your own mind on what to do for you and your family…I can’t make that decision or give you advice on that. For me and my wife…well, we are playing both games. Here’s what we are doing:

  1. Zero debt.
  2. Cash fund on hand.
  3. At least a year’s supply of everything necessities on hand.
  4. Keeping about 1/3 of our modest IRA in a S&P 500 index fund.
  5. Keeping our Situational Awareness on high.

Here is an ‘unknown’ to consider…the Elites plan. By that I mean, the elites running this country have a plan. The goal of that plan is an authoritarian state, they have made that clear on a number of occasions. The easiest way to implement the final stage(s) of their plan is martial law, or something similar. The easiest way to do that is having the citizenry in a state of panic, chaos, anger, desperation, and fear. The single easiest way to trigger all of that is a stock market crash and/or a bank run. At any time the Elites could push either of those buttons. So the big ‘unknown’…the Elites plan with their timeline.

My advice…pray, plan, prepare, practice.

I know I wandered around quite a bit on you trying to answer your question…I hope I was of some help.

 


Related Article:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Two-Party Political System Alternative?

  • xpansan

What is your proposal in place of a two-party political system? Thanks for the great article!

RE: Points/Events in History Destroying the United States

I don’t have one off the top of my head. I would have to go back and get seriously into the weeds regarding what our Founders set-up originally and why. Then I would look at the natural evolution with today’s technology. Example: Transporting ballot boxes by truck/van/car vs horse.

That being said…It would take an act of Congress, more likely an Amendment to the Constitution, to get it into law. Do you see either the House or the Senate willing to pass such a law? And if they did, can you imagine any President signing it into law? As for an Amendment…can you even begin to imagine enough states ratifying such an Amendment to make it Constitutional?

In my view…there is ZERO chance that we can eliminate a 2-party system via the government. Both parties are drunk on the power they have…and no way they would forego hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe billions, that they take into their party and candidates’ coffers! Their (Republican & Democrat Parties) lust after power and wealth way ahead of what is good for the country. They will give up neither wealth nor power…regardless of how good it would be for the country.

Okay, so there are two chances to eliminate the 2-party system that I have mentioned before:

1) Divine intervention

2) We the People


Related Article:

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Points/Events in History Destroying the United States

  • From: unknown

When did the USA crash & burn?

First off, let’s agree what “crash & burn” means. I believe you are referring to transitioning from a Constitutional Republic established by our Founders to the hideous and oppressive political monster we struggle under today. That being the case…

I am not convinced that there is a single event that can be pointed to that destroyed the US as a Constitutional Republic…or rather began its destruction. To fully understand that path of destruction I think it wise to understand what the Founding Fathers saw as a threat to the new Constitutional Republic and how to avoid it.

The Founders saw utter evil in:

  • The British Empire system of an all-powerful central government (oppression & tyranny).
  • A standing, professional army to enforce that power.
  • A tightly controlled economic system that didn’t allow for free markets, and the application of excessive taxes.
  • Worshiping a King more than, or equal to, God.

Once the colonies defeated the British Empire they desired to establish safeguards against such a tyrannical and oppressive government taking root in America. To that end they established preventative ideals/principles:

  1. Recognize God in defeating the British and inspiring both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Knowing full well both were meant only for a moral and righteous people. Doing so by integrating God into public life and the government process.
  2. Creating the Constitution to severely limit the federal government in both scope and power; and making it subservient to state governments in all matters excepting international relations.
  3. Established a state-based militia style of a military system to ensure that there was no professional, standing all-powerful army to enforce tyranny or to support a despotic leader.
  4. Ensuring that the Constitution supported a free-market system, free from any but nominal federal government control.
  5. Establish a gold/silver standard for the US dollar ensuring a solid and internationally recognized currency, eliminating the economy destroying fiat currency potential.
  6. Created the Bill of Rights to ensure that a federal government would not be able to establish an oppressive and tyrannical form of government against US citizens. And the Second Amendment was specifically adopted to ensure that the citizens of the US and states could keep the federal government from oppressing the people. Or, should the federal government become tyrannical and oppressive, the Second Amendment and militia style military would ensure that such government could be replaced as per the Declaration of Independence should the ballot box fail to remedy the situation.

So all that being said, here are the points in history that I believe have led the US federal government to become even worse, far worse, than the British Empire ever was:

  • 1909 – Corporate Income Tax: Legalized corporate tax transferring massive amount of wealth annually from US corporations to a bureaucratic federal government.
  • 1913 – The establishment of The Federal Reserve: Moved control of the US economy and currency away from the government and into the hands of private banks unaccountable to anyone. Transferring the entire control of the US economy into the hands of a few powerful individuals. It ensured the eventual complete destruction of a free-market economic system.
  • 1913 – Sixteenth Amendment: Legalized progressive income tax transferring massive amount of wealth annually from individual US citizens to a bureaucratic federal government.
  • 1913 – Seventeenth Amendment: Removal of power from the states to elect Senators via state legislatures. Effectively eliminating the power of state governments to be a check and balance on the federal government.
  • 1916 – Estate Tax: Legalized a tax on people who died transferring massive amount of wealth from dead individual US citizens to a bureaucratic federal government. The estate tax collections that had already been additionally taxed annually via federal income tax.
  • 1918 – World War I: The US realized just how powerful of a military the country could wield, basically unmatched in the world. A large, standing, professional army was created in direct opposition to the Founders’ intent and design.
  • 1932 – Gift Tax: Legalized tax on people who gave money to others, primarily family, transferring significant wealth annually from individual US citizens/families to a bureaucratic federal government. The money that had already been taxed annually via federal income tax.
  • 1934 – The National Firearms Act: Ensured the eventual total destruction of the Second Amendment and eliminating the ability of US citizens to oppose government tyranny and oppression.
  • 1935 – The Federal Bureau of Investigation: The creation of the FBI, the most powerful law enforcement agency in the world, destroyed any last hopes that the Constitution and Bill of Rights would remain intact and remain the law of the land protecting the rights/liberties/freedoms of US citizens.
  • 1945 – Military-Industrial Complex created/expanded: By the end of WW2 virtual control of the US military moved into private hands of industry via the monetary influence of decision makers inside the military and Congress. The number of “military actions” increased dramatically moving 10’s of trillions of dollars into a few private industries.
  • 1947 – Central Intelligence Agency: The creation of the CIA gave unlimited power, legal or otherwise, to the federal government to kill, imprison, or torture at will anyone, anywhere, for any reason without accountability or legal basis. This included political leaders, military leaders, entire governments, and any other person they deemed worthy of such treatment…foreign or domestic.
  • 1947 – Separation of Church and State: Everson v. Board of Education established the SCOTUS basis of eliminating God from the public square and ensuring the total fall of morality in public life.
  • 1962 – School Prayer Outlawed: Nine judges (SCOTUS) made the decision to eliminate prayer from schools.
  • 1971 – Gold standard abandoned: When the US abandoned the gold standard as a monetary policy it enabled a fiat currency and the adoption of Modern Monetary Theory. This move ensured the eventual collapse of the US currency and economy.
  • 1972 – ATF created: The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE), commonly referred to as the ATF was established. This gave the federal government a dedicated law enforcement agency whose sole mission was the elimination of the Second Amendment and the imprisonment or murder of alleged Second Amendment violators.
  • 1973 – Abortion legalized: Roe v. Wade decision by nine judges (SCOTUS) to legalize abortion has led to the death of 10’s of millions of babies in the US. A huge loss of life and human potential as well as an unfathomable offense against God. Infanticide on an unimaginable scale.
  • 1973 – National Debt: By 1973 the national debt began its unlimited, albeit a slow, rise since the US dollar was now a fiat currency.
  • 2001 – The Patriot Act: Ensured the immediate or eventual elimination of any and all Constitutional rights of US citizens.
  • 2002 – The Homeland Security Act: This gave ability to enforce the eventual destruction of all Constitutional under the Patriot Act, including creating an entire federal level ‘department’ (DHS) dedicated to the destruction of all rights/liberties/freedoms under the Constitution and Bill of Rights.
  • 2002 – National Debt: In 2002 the national debt began its out-of-control, skyrocketing rise with full implementation of Modern Monetary Theory.
  • 2007 – The Great Recession: While the huge transfer of wealth from average US citizens to the country’s wealthy elite was significant in itself (largest in the history of the world), the methodology implemented to “correct/stop” the economy free-fall was far worse. The federal government, under Bush #2 direction, used communist principles and “crony capitalism” principles to forever change the US financial system and remove any last vestiges of a free-market system from the US.
  • 2016 – Banana Republic (FBI): The FBI embedded spies in the campaign staff of an opposition US Presidential campaign creating a weaponized political system in the US (i.e. third-world Banana Republic).
  • 2017 – Banana Republic (FBI & CIA): the FBI in coordination with the CIA began a coup against a sitting US President to protect the DeepState and ensure the continuance of the fundamental transformation of the US.
  • 2020 – Banana Republic (FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc.): the FBI in coordination with the DOJ and CIA, along with mainstream media, social media, and tech companies began the largest election interference operation in US history ensuring the election ‘loss’ of a sitting US President.

In my opinion you can take each of these history points and directly apply them to the destruction of each of the 6 principles/ideals of the Founders…the foundation of the former US Constitutional Republic.

Ironically all the events noted above have occurred under both Democrat and Republican Presidents, and under both Democrat and Republican controlled Congresses. That to me points to one thing…the parties are one-in-the-same…there is no fundamental difference in their true intentions, motivations, and goals. Sadly our very first President, George Washington, rang the warning bell loud and clear over 200 years ago against the threat/danger of a two-party political system…and we as a country ignored that warning.

By ignoring that warning and allowing the unbridled lust for power and money to prevail in our political system we find ourselves suffering under an even worse situation than the British imposed on the early American Colonists. Today, tyranny, oppression, and despotism through an all-powerful, out-of-control federal government rules over us. The Democrats and Republicans have achieved their initial goals…but they aren’t done yet.

To me there is only a single, multi-faceted, answer to fix this, if there is one at all, and that is:

  1. The elimination of the two-party political system.
  2. The total and complete restoration of the Constitution (including the Bill of Rights) as intended and designed by the Founders.
  3. Understand, believe in, and be willing to implement the Declaration of Independence when/if needed.
  4. The return of God to American life…private and public.

Until such occurs, or divine intervention itself, the US has collapsed, the Constitutional Republic is a long forgotten ideal, and evil reigns in the US.

The absolute sad part…I believe that Americans are truly, essentially awesome good people with big hearts and compassionate souls. The national cancer is the US federal government…and it has been intentionally killing everything good and right in America bit-by-bit for over a hundred years. Americans deserve more than this federal government, its masters, and the ruling class.

What I have done next is identify the Founders’ ideals/principles into categories and then listed each historic event under that category to show the destruction of that ideal/principle.

God/Morals/Righteous Nation

  • 1947 – Separation of Church and State
  • 1962 – School Prayer Outlawed
  • 1973 – Abortion legalized

Limited Federal Government

  • 1913 – Sixteenth Amendment (Income Tax)
  • 1913 – Seventeenth Amendment (States’ check & balance)
  • 1916 – Estate Tax
  • 1932 – Gift Tax
  • 1935 – FBI created
  • 1947 – Central Intelligence Agency created
  • 1972 – ATF created
  • 2001 – The Patriot Act
  • 2002 – The Homeland Security Act
  • 2016 – Banana Republic (FBI)
  • 2017 – Banana Republic (FBI & CIA)
  • 2020 – Banana Republic (FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc.)

Militia Style Military (no professional, standing army)

  • 1918 – WWI (established professional, standing army)
  • 1945 – Military-Industrial Complex

Free-Markets (free economy)

  • 1909 – Corporate Income Tax
  • 1913 – The Federal Reserve
  • 1913 – Sixteenth Amendment (Income Tax)
  • 1916 – Estate Tax
  • 1932 – Gift Tax
  • 2007 – The Great Recession

Non-Fiat Currency & Non-Modern Monetary Policy

  • 1971 – Gold standard abandoned
  • 1973 – National Debt
  • 2002 – National Debt
  • 2007 – The Great Recession

Ability to Resist/Defeat Oppression & Tyranny

  • 1913 – Seventeenth Amendment (States’ check & balance)
  • 1934 – The National Firearms Act
  • 1935 – The Federal Bureau of Investigation created
  • 1945 – Military-Industrial Complex
  • 1947 – Central Intelligence Agency created
  • 1972 – ATF created
  • 2001 – The Patriot Act
  • 2002 – The Homeland Security Act
  • 2016 – Banana Republic (FBI)
  • 2017 – Banana Republic (FBI & CIA)
  • 2020 – Banana Republic (FBI, DOJ, CIA, etc.)

It was not my intention to include every single historic event that has led to a failed and destroyed US Constitutional Republic. Rather, I have listed what I believe to be the most significant primary events that have directly destroyed the very foundation of our country that our Founding Fathers believed in, fought for, died for, and eventually established via our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and Bill of Rights.

Anything other than a restoration of the principles, ideals, and values contained in the Declaration of Independence, Constitution, and the Bill of Rights will simply perpetuate the evil gripping the USA. We now suffer under a US Empire system that is no better, actually worse, than the British Empire that our forefathers fought against and died defeating.

Make no mistake, have no doubt, these are intentional and planned events in a grand scheme. A scheme to turn the US into an authoritarian/totalitarian state that benefits only a select few. These events did not occur in a vacuum or randomly by chance. It is all planned…and there is more of their evil to come…but not much more because their plan is almost complete. And that is what you must be aware of…and prepare for…there is nothing that can stop their plan…nothing. Well, other than a restoration or divine intervention. And I don’t see any group of people who are committed enough, brave enough, and knowledgeable enough to restore the Republic. At least not at this point.

And no…there is no Republican or Democrat candidate/politician that is committed enough, brave enough, and knowledgeable enough to lead a restoration. It has been the Republicans and Democrats behind the plan and implementing the plan all along.

Oh, just as George Washington warned us about…and we’ve ignored.


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Is RFK jr a viable candidate?

  • From: Lona

RE: I’d be interested in your opinion on RFK jr being a viable candidate (both electable and useful).

Well, first off I am super glad to hear you are thinking outside the box and not stuck in traditional thinking…traditional thinking is to blame for our country’s condition. Just asking that question about RFK shows intelligence, initiative, and a sincere desire to see America back on the right path.

I could give you the short answer…ok, I will…kinda. First off let’s make sure we agree on ‘viable’ meaning ‘capable of success’ (i.e. possible). Now let’s answer the ‘electable’ first. The answer is yes if voters went strictly by issue positions…especially so if in terms of an out-of-control tyrannical federal government. If only considering strictly anti-American philosophy (i.e. traditional thinking)…no, he is not a viable candidate. More on that later.

Now, ‘useful’…yes, in terms of showing TPTB that we the people will not tolerate the current, or any, anti-American two-party political system. RFK would have both parties working against him regardless of what would be good for America. Hence, RFK would fail at nearly everything as President…unless the citizenry stood up and took down the anti-American two-party political system.

Now, realistically speaking is there any chance RFK would/could be elected? No. Plain and simple…no. Why? Because virtually all Americans have been led astray into a two-party political system. Both parties are only concerned about power…getting it, retaining it, and wielding it. Wielding it about 99.9% of the time against what is best for America…yes, both political parties.

George Washington warned us against a two-party system…he said it would destroy America. And it has. A two-party political system is a virtual mirror image of the empire our Founders detested and fought against. So the Republican and Democrat parties are not pro-America…they are both anti-American and against the intent of the Founders. And that my friend is why America has failed and fallen.

FWIW…Remember who killed RFK’s father and uncle.


Related Articles –

 


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.