Is RFK jr a viable candidate?

  • From: Lona

RE: I’d be interested in your opinion on RFK jr being a viable candidate (both electable and useful).

Well, first off I am super glad to hear you are thinking outside the box and not stuck in traditional thinking…traditional thinking is to blame for our country’s condition. Just asking that question about RFK shows intelligence, initiative, and a sincere desire to see America back on the right path.

I could give you the short answer…ok, I will…kinda. First off let’s make sure we agree on ‘viable’ meaning ‘capable of success’ (i.e. possible). Now let’s answer the ‘electable’ first. The answer is yes if voters went strictly by issue positions…especially so if in terms of an out-of-control tyrannical federal government. If only considering strictly anti-American philosophy (i.e. traditional thinking)…no, he is not a viable candidate. More on that later.

Now, ‘useful’…yes, in terms of showing TPTB that we the people will not tolerate the current, or any, anti-American two-party political system. RFK would have both parties working against him regardless of what would be good for America. Hence, RFK would fail at nearly everything as President…unless the citizenry stood up and took down the anti-American two-party political system.

Now, realistically speaking is there any chance RFK would/could be elected? No. Plain and simple…no. Why? Because virtually all Americans have been led astray into a two-party political system. Both parties are only concerned about power…getting it, retaining it, and wielding it. Wielding it about 99.9% of the time against what is best for America…yes, both political parties.

George Washington warned us against a two-party system…he said it would destroy America. And it has. A two-party political system is a virtual mirror image of the empire our Founders detested and fought against. So the Republican and Democrat parties are not pro-America…they are both anti-American and against the intent of the Founders. And that my friend is why America has failed and fallen.

FWIW…Remember who killed RFK’s father and uncle.


Related Articles –

 


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

SitRep – 5/23/2024: What do you think China will do?

RE: SitRep – 5/23/2024

  • What do you think China will do?

Well, the answer came quickly, very quickly. Yesterday China started 2 days of “training”. According to Beijing the training exercise was meant to “punish” the island simulating a full-scale attack. During the “training” Chinese air resources entered Taiwan’s air space nearly 100 times and Chinese warships entered Taiwan’s territorial waters almost 50 times. Chinese military forces completely surrounded the island as part of the simulated full-scale invasion.

Taiwan scrambled jets and put missile, naval and land units on alert during China’s training. Taiwan’s President William Lai, has been called a ‘ dangerous troublemaker’ by Beijing. China also stressed in a statement that Taiwan is an “inalienable” part of China’s territory.

And for the record…this was China’s largest ever exercise of this type.

So now you know…it is only a matter of time until China makes its real move against Taiwan. And if we make a military move to defend Taiwan…all hell will break loose. Not only would we lose another war…the world might turn to ash.

Pray…


Related Article –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

US Senators say ATF weren’t wearing cameras when they killed Malinowski.

  • I read an article that says none of the ATF agents who raided Malinowski’s home wore body cameras. So now what? BTW you nailed this situation!

The articles you are referring to was based on both US Senators from Arkansas stating that fact publicly in a joint statement. They were given that information from the Department of Justice. So let me turn this around on you…

Why do you think that out of all of the ATF raiding party not a single one of them was wearing a body camera that recorded Malinowski allegedly opening fire on them and the ATF returning fire killing him with a bullet to the head?

Follow it up with this one…How could none of the 20 – 40 man highly armed, highly trained, totally professional ATF operators not have a body camera on? Not a single one of them remembering clearly that it is an ATF policy for 2 years now that they must wear body cameras for such an operation.

We good so far?

Now here we go…

  • Do you think that any of those involved in killing Malinowski will face charges for his death…or even an actual legitimate investigation?
  • Do you think all/any of those ATF operators will face disciplinary actions for clearly and intentionally violating a strict ATF policy on body cameras?
  • Do you think all/any of those ATF operators will get promoted and performance bonuses this year?
  • Do you think that maybe, just maybe, the DOJ will cover for the ATF actions and policy violations?
  • Why do you think the DOJ would do something like that cover-up?

Let me get flip for a moment…Why did you ask me a question you already know the answer to? And yes, I know that you can answer the questions that I posed as well.

And I “nailed it” because we all know how these unconstitutional federal law enforcement agencies work in this day and age…it is clear as a bell to anyone with eyes to see and ears to hear. Or…they wouldn’t act this way now would they? And we wouldn’t have a bunch of dead US citizens laying around would we?


Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Can the US be saved…Why not?

  • In a previous post you were asked ‘Can the US be saved?’ I read your answer. It was incomplete. Why not?

There are three major insurmountable obstacles to America being saved.

#1 – Debt. Never in the history of the world has any empire using fiat currency and implementing modern monetary theory (MMT) ever been “saved”…they have ALL fallen. Just to be clear, the US is an “empire” by definition. The debt the US has accumulated cannot be sustained, which is modern monetary theory. Debt will crash the US Empire, that is an indisputable fact, and proven by thousands of years of history…the US will be no different.

#2 – The invasion of illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants now make up approximately 15% of the population of the US. The extreme danger involved is the majority of the illegals are criminals before they cross our border, and all are criminals for crossing our border illegally. The chaos, crime, and financial impact cannot be overcome. It is past the tipping point, it is now on an exponential curve to destruction. And no, US citizens do not have the stomach to deport all of the illegals. Hell, we don’t have the stomach to depart just all the harden criminal illegals.

#3 – Political Parties. George Washington warned us against political parties, specifically a 2-party system, just over 200 years ago. And he was exactly right! The problem is, as Washington pointed out, a political party is simply interested in getting into, and staying in, power. In the US we are stuck in a death spiral with the Democrats and Republicans. Neither party does a damn thing to actually improve the country as per the Constitution…as in rights, freedoms, and liberties. Both parties are war-mongering, both parties can’t control their spending, both parties are tied into the military-industrial complex, both parties are corrupt….both parties are destroying our country. And that is a simple, indisputable fact. So, as long as we are stuck with, and vote within, a 2-party system there is no saving the US from destruction.

There is a fourth reason out there, vague to be sure…kinda lurking in the shadows. It is easy to see, hard to adequately describe, and vehemently debated when brought up. The dark horse to America not being able to be saved is the accelerating rise of authoritarianism in the US. And it is coming from not just from the deepstate, but also from both parties. And remember this…in the entire history of the world, in the totality of mankind, authoritarians have never given up power willingly.

FYI…”Empire” is described as being a major political unit having a territory of great extent or a number of territories or peoples under a single sovereign authority. The US covers a huge territory consisting of political units such as states (50), territories (11), and one district. The “single sovereign authority” is the federal government. So the US is by definition an “empire”.


Articles in this Series –
Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Malinowski and the ATF follow-up question…

  • I read your article on Malinowski and the ATF. Pretty much spot on from what I can tell. Why do you think the ATF is like that and what do you think there opinion of you and your article is?

Well, two questions but they go to the same issue…mindset. Let me hit on that which answers both your questions.

ATF personnel are true believers. They think the are serving the Constitution, they see themselves as heroes. They are convinced that they are striving to keep America safe against the bad guys. It starts with their initial training…their boot camp if you will.

Think about this…do you for a minute think they ever bring up the subject that the ATF as a federal government agency isn’t authorized in the Constitution? Of course not. To the contrary, I am sure the recruits hear repeatedly how great their agency is, how rich their agency history is, how much the ATF serves the American people, and the country is safer for their existence.

The precursor of the ATF was formed in 1886 as the “Revenue Laboratory” more commonly referred to as revenuers or “revenoors”. Basically, collecting tax revenue and/or smashing unregistered liquor producing stills. In 1968, with the passage of the Gun Control Act, they became what we know as the ATF. Raising money through “tax stamps” and licensing.

So here is the fact of the matter…the Gun Control Act of 1968 is in direct violation of the 2nd Amendment. And based on that unconstitutional law the ATF was reformed to enforce the infringement of people’s gun rights. I wonder if they ever teach that in the ATF school?

Let’s recap a couple things…the major gun laws that have destroyed the 2nd Amendment…

First, in 1934 there was The National Firearms Act (NFA) pushed through by Progressive/Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Second, in 1938 the The Federal Firearms Act (FFA). Also pushed through by Progressive/Democrat President Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Third, in 1968 there was the Gun Control Act, pushed through by Democrat President Lyndon B. Johnson.

Notice a trend there…one was a Progressive/Democrat who was clearly an authoritarian and often considered a closet socialist. The other was also a Democrat and without any question an authoritarian. Do you find any of that interesting?

So, let’s wrap this up…I am sure any ATF personnel that read my article think I am a whack job at best, maybe a bit of an idealist, and possibly a marginal threat. They would immediately dismiss my statement that the ATF is not authorized in the Constitution as pure hooey, the ravings of some right-wing backwoods hillbilly radical.

Have you ever heard of “group think” or the “hive culture”? In either situation individuals mostly lose the ability to think for themselves…and to makes matters worse…they don’t even know it.

So let’s touch on one more thing…$money$. An ATF field agent can earn between $85k – $115k per year…BEFORE any locality pay, overtime pay, law enforcement “offset”, etc.. So add to their base pay another $25k – $35k for those niceties. Oh wait…there is an incredible health insurance program and pension program. For health insurance add in another $12k – $18k per year. And for pension add in $26k – $34k per year. So now you are looking at an annual salary of somewhere around $148k – $202,000 per year when all is said and done. Not bad, eh?

Well now, let’s talk the average person in the USA…they make approximately $41k per year. So the average ATF agents are making almost 4 to 5 times the average American. Whoa…sweet, eh?

Oh, I forgot to mention…if an ATF agent retires after 30 years of service they are bringing in about $76k – $103k per year in pension money…for the rest of their lives!

So is the money a huge motivation to join the ATF…and to go along with the program regardless of any moral or ethical issues?

As for my article…there is no way they would put any credibility to it at all. Coz if they did…think of that nice fat paycheck they would be jeopardizing. And that is also food for thought when it comes to wondering why there are virtually no ATF “whistleblowers” coming forward. Actually, I can’t think of a single one.

Doesn’t life get interesting when a person has the courage to stop and truly and honestly think through issues?


Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send me a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Can the US be saved?

  • Can the US be saved?

Well, that depends. Why? Because it is a relative question. Relative to “saved” to what point in time, and how do you described “saved”.

So I would describe “saved” meaning restoring rights, liberties, and freedoms back to the “we the people”. What “rights, liberties, and freedoms” am I talking about? The ones outlined in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, along with the intentions of the Founding Fathers. Basically moving power back to the people and away from government…as the Founders envisioned.

As to what point in time…compared to when I was a kid, the US is long lost…and I mean by a long shot. Compared to pre-9/11 the country is already lost as well. Who do you see that could take the reins of government and return it to its Constitutional foundation?

As far as I can see…no one. Maybe you think differently but I can’t see a single person that has a desire to restore the Constitution and return the government to its very restricted and limited place. Do you see anyone?

And even if you could name one…do you think the deep state, the bureaucrats, the elites, the globalists, or the rich would allow them to do that? Of course not, they aren’t going to give up their power at all…not a single one of them. So no one has a chance to restore even if someone had the desire.

So let’s ask the question again…Can the US be saved? Yes.

However, there is only a single way that the US can be saved in any definition of the word. And that is through divine intervention…period.

So now ask the questions…Could it happen vs will it happen? And if it would happen…Why?


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Why haven’t you written about the ATF killing Malinowski?

  • Why haven’t you written about the ATF killing Malinowski?

Should I have to? It’s pretty clear what happened and why. Well, to anyone who understands the big picture…as well as the details.

Let’s talk about this in a realistic, honest, clear, and logical manner. No government propaganda and no conspiracy theory tinfoil hat hooey. Just talk about facts based on information that is current and pretty well documented.

Here is what we know about Bryan Malinowski:

  1. Malinowski was a public official, well-known, well-respected, high-profile member of the community with no criminal record of any kind.
  2. He was suspected by the ATF of selling 150 +/- guns over an approximately 3-year period.
  3. Allegedly, six of those guns were suspected of being used in a crime by the person he sold them to.
  4. 3 – 5 of the “crimes” were marijuana possession.
  5. Allegedly, three of those gun sales were to undercover law enforcement officers.
  6. None of the sales were identified as actually being “illegal”.
  7. Allegedly, paperwork on some (number unknown) of the guns that were sold were initially identified by Malinowski for personal use and not for resale. Note: There is nothing under current law that prevents a person from changing their mind and later selling a gun.

The law covering #7 states “…purchase of firearms for the purpose of resale for livelihood and profit without a Federal firearms license is a violation of Federal law.” Since Malinowski had a well-paying job (livelihood) providing a comfortable living there is no violation since he wasn’t doing it for “livelihood” and there is no indication that he made a “profit” on any sale. Hence, no violation was committed and none documented by ATF on the search warrant or any other court document…according to the law.

Here’s what we know about the search warrant:

  • There was no description of any crime committed by Malinowski only a suspicion of potential crime(s).
  • The “warrant” was to search for evidence since the ATF didn’t have sufficient evidence to show any criminal activity had already been committed.
  • There was no “arrest” warrant which means they had no evidence to even indicate a reasonable suspicion that Malinowski had actually committed a crime.
  • It was executed before dawn when the ATF knew Malinowski would be asleep.
  • There is no evidence whatsoever that the ATF SWAT team announced their presence; making this a “no-knock” warrant.

So here are the questions:

  • If the ATF considered Malinowski a criminal and selling guns illegally, why was there no arrest warrant for criminal activity?
  • If this was only a search warrant why not have it executed during the day, with regular agents announcing themselves and then working through the search with Malinowski? You know, simply ask him about the sales and did he have paperwork to back up the sales…reasonable actions to a normal and reasonable person.
  • Why the necessity of a 20 – 40 man highly armed military operation in a civilian neighborhood?
  • If a “no-knock” warrant was considered vital, why? Was Malinowski that extremely dangerous? There is ZERO evidence that this was the case.
  • If he was that dangerous, why was there no arrest warrant as well?
  • Why has no ATF video released showing the raid?
  • Why did the ATF agents disable the home’s video camera prior to breaking through the door?
  • Has the ATF identified the agent shot and confirmed he was shot by Malinowski or “friendly fire”?
  • How did the ATF personnel manage to shoot him directly in the head during a supposed “gunfight”? Actually, how many times was Malinowski shot and where?

So here are a couple of thoughts:

  • Executing a pre-dawn military operation while people are still asleep is to gain maximum surprise making it far easier to kill the enemy. That is a well-known military tactic, especially for US special forces.
  • The ATF knew Malinowski would be asleep.
  • The ATF knows that any normal person who owns guns would have one ready to defend their home and family against break-ins or home invasions.
  • The ATF knew Malinowski would defend his home and family against home invasions.

And finally let’s touch on a couple of issues:

  • Brian Malinowski had not been charged with any crime, no arrest warrant had been issued.
  • There is no evidence that any gun sale was illegal, only alleged, and without any evidence to support the allegation.
  • There is no indication whatsoever that Malinowski was prone to violence, had ever committed any violence, or would commit any violence.
  • The laws that the ATF were attempting to gather evidence on from Malinowski are all violating the Second Amendment since the amendment states “…shall not be infringed.” There is no wording that allows for excluding buying and/or selling of arms in the amendment. The US Constitution is a negative rights constitution, meaning that if the right isn’t stated, then the government doesn’t have it. So there is NO authorization in the US Constitution for the federal government to infringe on a citizens gun rights.
  • The US Constitution does not authorize any agency such as the ATF. Therefore, the ATF is, in and of itself, an unconstitutional government agency with no right to even exist.

So let’s carry this out logically, pure and simple, no bullshit involved:

  • The US Constitution doesn’t allow for laws to be written infringing on a citizen’s gun rights. So the law(s) Malinowski supposedly violated are invalid.
  • The judge that authorized the no-knock raid violated Malinowski’s 4th Amendment rights. So the warrant was illegally authorized.
  • The agency (ATF) that conducted the raid is not a legally established agency under the US Constitution.

So, if the anti-gun law isn’t Constitutional, and if the people carrying out the raid aren’t legally representing the US government, and the warrant was issued contrary to the 4th Amendment…then who is at fault for Malinowski being dead?

But, let’s look at this in an entirely different light for just a moment.

It is clear, proof positive, that the US federal government is anti-gun; absolutely all in on that. All governments that are anti-gun are authoritarian in nature. All authoritarian governments fear losing power over their citizens. Governments’ primary means of controlling citizens is by fear…fear of violating the law, fear of being fined, fear of being put in prison, fear of being killed, even fear of just being spotlighted by the government.

So why would the ATF kill Malinowski? Well to answer that one, consider…

Why did the FBI kill Craig Deleeuw Robertson, an invalid, a handicapped senior citizen with no criminal record and no ability to carry out any kind of violent crime?

Why did the ATF/FBI kill Randy Weaver’s wife and child?

Why did the ATF/FBI burn nearly 80 people alive in Waco?

Amazingly, in every situation the ATF/FBI always maintains that the person/people targeted fired first. And yet, they have failed to ever provide proof of such, or failed to show that people were simply defending themselves against armed attackers who were unknown and unidentified?

Would it be realistic to say that we have some very psychotic and dangerous…potentially evil/demonic…killers working for the FBI and ATF?

If not, then why raid a person’s home with a no-knock warrant, by complete surprise, military-style raids by lots of heavily armed men who readily and willingly kill US citizens at the drop of a hat?

I guess then you might have a lot of reason to pose this question…

Is this what happens when you have an authoritarian federal government create agencies that are not authorized in the Constitution trying enforce laws that are in direct violation of that same Constitution?

Maybe all this about messaging? Ever read the book, or see the movie, “1984”? Maybe the answer to all of this can be found there.

Please pray! Pray for softened hearts and open minds. Pray for kindness and compassion. Pray for justice and mercy. Pray for calm. Pray for peace.


Related Articles –

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Garden: Q & A – Tomato Soil

  • From: floidb

RE: Garden Tip: Potting Soil

Greetings and thanks for the helpful article. Do you think this mixture would work well for planting the tomatoes in a raised container, once they are large enough to plant outside, or would it need anything more? 


The short answer is an unqualified “yes!” Meaning, yes, you need a better soil for your tomato plants outside in raised beds.

The #1 problem I’ve run into growing tomatoes is what is called blossom end rot. It comes from not enough calcium. But here is the tricky part…there is usually enough calcium in the soil, but the plant is having a hard time getting the calcium from the soil into the plant.

What does that have to do with your question? You have to have a great soil with a consistent and adequate watering schedule.

Great Soil: Peat moss is great for seedlings because it is sterile and won’t corrupt your seedlings. But tomato plants producing fruit need a whole lot of nutrients. And that my friend means compost, lot’s of good quality compost. I’ve bought mine from a local city sanitary district but we stopped because there was too much trash in it. I found a company locally that accepts green waste then turns it into compost, landscape mulch, and bark chips. It is clean and well composted.

To make my soil I use 8 parts compost, 1 part peat moss, 1 part perlite, 1 part native soil (ours is sandy). If you want to step it up a notch you can add 1 part vermiculite. Vermiculite is a lightweight, sterile, and expandable mineral that improves soil texture and moisture retention. Vermiculite is notably more expensive than perlite but is a nice additive to my basic mix.

Why do I use our native sandy soil? To reduce cost and give some drainage to the soil. If you have a rich black soil like parts of the mid-west then you can probably cut back on the compost. And remember, I grow everything in raised beds due to the very poor condition of our natural, in-ground, dirt. If I live where I grew up, great soil to begin with, then I would do everything in-ground and just amend the soil as needed.

Tomato plants need a pretty well draining soil but consistent watering. They don’t like constantly wet roots but they do need a consistent deep watering so they can take up the needed nutrients. I plant my tomato plants deep, usually about 10 – 12” of the stem in the dirt. If I can’t get them that deep then I go horizontal for 12” or so and about 6” deep.

Now, when I plant I dig my hole then place bone meal in the bottom of the hole along with that 2-2-2 organic fertilizer I mentioned. This year I am trying an additional step…gypsum on the surface around the plant, then mixed in just slightly, then well watered. The bone meal and gypsum are sources of calcium that plant needs. And yes, I will add fertilizer about 1x per month as needed during the growing season.

Waiting until you see how I trim them! Yeah, a bit radical.

NOTE: Be careful when buying compost! It may be “hot” meaning a whole lot of nitrogen in it. That will burn your plants up. < click here to read how I burned up my strawberry plants > Compost needs plenty of time to cook and then cool down. Talk to your supplier about it. I still leave mine sitting on the ground covered for months just to make sure.


Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message about gardening…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 

 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Declaration vs Constitution and Bill of Rights

  • From: no name given

You talk so much about the Declaration of Independence but once the Constitution along with the Bill of Rights was written doesn’t that make the Declaration of Independence obsolete?

Absolutely not!

Think of it this way…Without a good and solid foundation a building is weak and will fall apart eventually. Or, if a bridge doesn’t have sound piles and footers it will fail and collapse.

So the Declaration of Independence is the foundation of America, the foundation of freedom and liberty in the United States. Without it, the Constitution, along with the Bill of Rights, will fail, fall, and completely collapse because they have no solid foundation.

At the beginning the Declaration of Independence states that the sole purpose of government is to secure the rights that God has given people, all people. Additionally, the only power that government has comes from the consent of the governed. And when government no longer secures God-given rights, or assumes power that the people don’t willingly agree to…well, then the people have the right to alter or to abolish that government. Why? Because that failed/fallen government no longer has legitimacy.

Actually the Declaration of Independence is more direct and to the point in that matter. The Declaration of Independence states not only is it the people’s right, but it is their duty to throw off such government.

Therefore, the Declaration of Independence is the very foundation of the United States of America. The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are built upon it and depend on it. Without the Declaration of Independence there is no ultimate authorization, right, or duty to correct the problems with government. And that Bill Of Rights to the Constitution - first amendment - 1st - freedom of speechauthorization, right, and duty comes from God.

Here are some quotes from leaders of the Church I belong to, I hope they help…

The signers of the Declaration of Independence and the framers of the Constitution were inspired from on high to do that work.” Brigham Young – July 4, 1854

It was by and through the power of God, that the fathers of this country framed the Declaration of Independence, and also that great palladium of human rights, the Constitution of the United States.” John Taylor – April 8, 1883

Those men who laid the foundation of this American government and signed the Declaration of Independence were the best spirits the God of heaven could find on the face of the earth. They were choice spirits, not wicked men. General Washington and all the men that labored for the purpose were inspired of the Lord.” Wilford Woodruff – April 1898

Our government came into existence through divine guidance. The inspiration of the Lord rested upon the patriots who established it, and inspired them through the dark days of their struggle for independence and through the critical period which followed that struggle when they framed our glorious Constitution which guarantees to all the self-evident truth proclaimed in the Declaration of Independence, “that all men are created equal: that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights: that among these rights are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Joseph Fielding Smith – April 1943

Both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States were brought forth under the inspiration of God to establish and maintain the freedom of the people of this nation. I said it, and I believe it to be true. There is a miracle in its establishment that cannot be explained in any other way.” Gordon B. Hinckley – August 1999

So what is the problem and why do we need such documents as the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and a Constitutional Republic with all its checks and balances on power?

The original Prophet of our church has said this about men, “We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion.”

One of the tenants of the religion that I subscribe to states, “We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law.” The ‘law’ being Constitutional law, laws instituted for the benefit of man.

I will leave you with this to ponder…

“4 And now, verily I say unto you concerning the laws of the land, it is my will that my people should observe to do all things whatsoever I command them.

5 And that law of the land which is constitutional, supporting that principle of freedom in maintaining rights and privileges, belongs to all mankind, and is justifiable before me.

6 Therefore, I, the Lord, justify you, and your brethren of my church, in befriending that law which is the constitutional law of the land;

7 And as pertaining to law of man, whatsoever is more or less than this, cometh of evil.”

God has given us agency to choose, to make our own decisions, based on His will and guidance. As with the Founders, should a person decide to fight tyranny, oppression, and evil…we are free to do so. Actually the Declaration of Independence says it is our duty. However, that doesn’t make us immune to the repercussions in this life from evil men that are the tyrants and oppressors.

Thank goodness that our Founding Fathers fought tyranny and oppression of an evil government…and won. Not only that…they laid out the process by which to do so in the future should the need arise…the Declaration of Independence…an inspired document written by men inspired of God.

So for me…the Declaration of Independence will never become obsolete as long as the earth exists with governments run by man. The Declaration of Independence is what originally made America great.


Related Articles –

Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

#1 Danger in the US and world today?

  • From: name withheld upon request

I’ve read your stuff for years now. You go into a lot of detail at times, too much at times. Can you tell me plainly what is the #1 Danger in the US and world today?

That is really simple…but let me explain in detail!

Okay, seriously if you want the simple version here it is…

In the USA the #1 problem/danger is government. Yup, that simple.

Explanation: Government as such is not the problem, it is what we’ve allowed it to become is the problem that has morphed into “danger” as well. To me the federal government is the biggest problem for two reasons; 1) they have the most powerful forum to take away rights/liberties/freedoms, 2) they have the guns to back-up those thefts. For 135 years the federal government has been degrading the Constitution and Bill of Rights…and we’ve elected those who’ve done it. But don’t think the local and state governments are exempt. State governments have done things like forcibly, by power of law, taken children away from the home and fed them concepts/principles/ideas that wants to make me vomit; it’s called ‘public education’. And local governments forcing people to build their own home a certain way and then pay horribly high property taxes. Yup, practically destroying the affordable housing market along the way…and lining the pockets of government folks, builders, insurance companies, etc.

In the world today the #1 problem/danger is the US government. Yup, that simple.

Explanation: What government has been involved in and is responsible for more wars in the last 150 years? You got it…the USA. Just to name the last 3…Who started the Iraq war? The USA. Who started the Afghanistan War? The USA. Who started the Ukraine/Russia war? The USA when they overthrew the pro-Russian Ukrainian government in 2014 and green-lighted Russia’s invasion a month before Russia invaded…and the US torpedoed a peace deal 6 months into the war. Who is the #1 member of a huge military alliance (NATO) that threatens the largest country in the world (Russia)…who is legitimately not a threat to the world? The USA. Who has the most evil, deadly, and active secret agency (the CIA) in the world who overthrows sovereign governments, assassinates world leaders, conducts coups, runs drugs, sells illegal arms, etc.? The USA.

Now, before you get your panties in a wad. The American people are NOT the US federal government…for the most part. Although we keep electing the politicians that run the government.

Interesting…15% of the US workforce work for government. That is pathetic!!!

In 1800 the US population was about 5.5million people with about 4,000 fed employees. Today the US population being about 327million with 7million people receiving a fed paycheck. 1800 = .07% (.0007) of the population got a fed paycheck. Today it is 2% (.02) of the US population gets a fed paycheck. That is 30 times more federals sucking money out of the US economy and controlling the US citizenry today than in 1800!!!! And yes, that is in relative terms…so the numbers are real.

So why do you think that is?

Here’s a couple more for you…

  1. Why does the US federal government have US military personnel stationed/deployed in 170 countries in the world?
  2. Why does the US federal government have about 750 military bases in 80 countries in the world?

FYI…there are only 190 countries in the world. So the US military occupies 42% of the world’s countries and has a military presence in 90% of the world’s countries.

Now hold on a minute…check this out…

All of that and we can’t even control our own borders from being invaded by people from around the world.

Gee, I wonder what all this is about anyways?????


Q & A Time…Ask me a question or send a message…

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨





 

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.