First off let’s review Customs and Border Protection (CBP) just to make sure we are on the same page. From the CBP website…

Let’s review CBP’s mission statement…

Protect the American people, safeguard our borders, and enhance the nation’s economic prosperity.

Make it simple:

1. Is CBP keeping the American people safe?

2. Is CBP safeguarding our borders?

The clear and obvious answer to both is a resounding “no” by any definition.

Next step, let’s review the CBP mission priorities…

Enduring Mission Priorities

• Counter Terrorism – Anticipate, detect and disrupt the threat of terrorists, their weapons and actions to protect the people and economy of the United States.
• Combat Transnational Crime – Detect, deter and disrupt transnational organized crime that threatens U.S. national and economic security interests at and beyond the border.
• Secure the Border – Protect the Homeland through the air, land and maritime environments against illegal entry, illicit activity or other threats to uphold national sovereignty and promote national and economic security.
• Facilitate Lawful Trade and Protect Revenue – Enable fair, competitive and compliant trade and enforce U.S. laws to ensure safety, prosperity and economic security for the American people.
• Facilitate Lawful Travel – Enhance, enable and transform the travel experience by anticipating, detecting and intercepting threats prior to and at ports of entry.

Here is what we know to be absolute 100% fact…

1. Hundreds of known terrorists are being caught each year attempting to cross the southern border each year. Estimates range from 200 – 1200 terrorists who are successfully crossing the border each year.

2. 100’s of thousands of crimes are being committed each year against US citizens within the borders of the US…murders, rapes, sex trafficking, drug dealing, robberies, assaults, etc.

3. Minor children are being smuggled across the southern border and have been found in horrible working conditions performing illegal jobs at virtual slave labor rates.

4. Millions and millions of illegal aliens are being smuggled into the US and working in jobs at substandard, often illegal, rates of pay…eliminating jobs that could be available to American workers.

5. Tons and tons of deadly drugs are being smuggled into the country each year which then are peddled by drug dealers, often related to foreign drug cartels, to US citizens…many of which are overdosing at historic rates.

Is CBP successful with their own ‘mission priorities’?

The clear and obvious answer is a resounding “no” by any definition.

Now it’s time to review CBP’s ‘Ethos’ and ‘Core Values’…

• 
• Vigilance is how we ensure the safety of all Americans. We are continuously watchful and alert to deter, detect and prevent threats to our nation. We demonstrate courage and valor in the protection of our nation.
• Service to Country is embodied in the work we do. We are dedicated to defending and upholding the Constitution of the United States. The American people have entrusted us to protect the homeland and defend liberty.
• Integrity is our cornerstone. We are guided by the highest ethical and moral principles. Our actions bring honor to ourselves and our agency.

Did you have a good laugh???? Is there any single core value that CBP is in any way, shape, or form successful?

The clear and obvious answer is a resounding “no” by any definition.

So why have CBP at all?

Exactly!!!! The CBP is a complete and total failure in their job…PERIOD! But, why are they such a failure? Because it isn’t their job to begin with…yup, it’s that simple. You see, there is no Constitutional authorization for US Customs and Border Patrol to even exist. That’s right…the CBP is not in the Constitution!!

So who is responsible to guard our borders? That is just as simple…the military.

But it is much worse than all of this mentioned so far.

For CBP employees they take the standard federal employee oath of office…

5 U.S. Code § 3331 – Oath of office : “I, [person’s name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

So pose these questions…

1. Are criminals from foreign countries an ‘enemy’?

2. Are terrorists from foreign countries an ‘enemy’?

3. Are highly trained drug cartel hit-men an ‘enemy’?

4. Are foreign spies an ‘enemy’?

5. Are hundreds of thousands of these enemies coming across the border each year?

Once more…the clear and obvious answer to each question is a resounding ‘yes’!

But it is still much worse than that!

The US Constitution…Article III Section 3 defines treason as…

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

The ‘adhering’ and ‘aid and comfort’ part is more narrowly defined by the Supreme Court as…

…person could be convicted of treason only if he or she adhered to an enemy and gave that enemy aid and comfort.

Clearly, CBP is giving aid and comfort to the enemies crossing our borders. CBP agents give them food, water, maps, medical aid, transportation, housing, debit cards, cell phones, and more. So then the question comes down to ‘adhere’…do CBP employees adhere to these enemies crossing our borders. We have to look at what ‘adhere’ means in the context of the Constitution, treason, and the question of CBP actions.

“A citizen intellectually or emotionally favors the enemy and harbors sympathies or convictions disloyal to this country’s policy or interest.”

To answer that question, in my opinion, is you look at the outcomes of the CBP’s actions…millions and millions of illegal aliens (enemies) are assisted in entering the country illegally by CBP employees. This nearly 45 million strong invasion force commit hundreds of thousands of serious violent crimes, rapes, murders, millions of property crimes, and they deal drugs that kill hundreds of thousands of people each year. These crimes are committed by the same people who CBP helps enter the country to begin with! And then there are the spies and terrorists!

So then the question is this…Being fully aware of the horrendous and grievous destruction of the US and terrible crimes against US citizens by this millions strong invasion of illegals, why do CBP allow them in? Actually, it is worse than that…Why does CBP actively support and assist this terribly destructive and deadly invasion force?

Obviously, CBP employees favor this enemy over US citizens…why else would they help them to enter this country to commit these crimes and destruction? Do these same CBP employees harbor sympathies disloyal to the US’s policies and interests? Seems kinda obvious to me…what about you?

Given all of this…Are CBP guilty of committing treason as defined by the Constitution? Or are they just complete and utterly incompetent in doing their job…total failures?

Did you answer that question objectively? Hell, did you even have the courage to consider the question?

What I find interesting…That the question even comes up for CBP’s 60,000 employees of a government agency not authorized by the Constitution who happen to be complete and total failures at doing a job they defined for themselves.

Then I do have to ponder this…What part of the current US federal government Executive Branch resembles what the Founders outlined/authorized in the US Constitution?

Dang, then this question comes to mind…Why have we allowed it to happen, and why do we tolerate it today?

What I find interesting…CBP (not authorized by the Constitution) is under of the Department of Homeland Security (not authorized by the Constitution) both failing miserably, completely and totally at their jobs.

Then again…could it be by design…you think?

Hang on…anyone consider why 100,000 children, that we know of, have been smuggled into this and no one knows where they are or who they are living with…and CBP helped them enter the country illegally? Kinda makes you wonder a little bit doesn’t it.

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

The Supreme Court (SCOTUS), as a whole, once again proved itself to be little more than another Hydra snake of those determined to destroy the United States at all costs. It is a habit of theirs…one that they should be ashamed of…but are not. Problem is…this latest treacherous move of theirs could ignite a civil war.

Let’s hit the background briefly…

Texas governor recently declared a state of emergency to deal with millions of criminals and illegal aliens invading his state. The invasion of foreigners are causing destruction of private property worse than any hurricane or wildfire. But the real price that Texas citizens are paying is in terms of crime. Crime that has skyrocketed in the last couple of decades costing Texans’ lives by the hundreds every year…in addition to horrendous sex crimes by the dregs of these invaders.

Yes, I used invasion, invading, and invaders for a very specific reason. Here is the most common meaning of invasion, “incursion of an army for conquest or plunder.” However, there are additional legal meanings:

• the entrance or advent of anything troublesome or harmful,
• an occasion when a large number of people or things come to a place in an annoying and unwanted way,
• the incoming or spread of something usually hurtful.

Remember the annoying little thing called the US Constitution? Yeah, well, Article IV, Section 4 reads as follows…

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

So the US federal government is legally responsible for two things of specific note here:

1. The federal government shall protect all states from invasion,
2. When asked, the federal government shall protect the state from violence.

In legal terms, as applied to this use of the term “shall”, it means “imperative or mandatory” action must be taken. Obviously the US federal government is completely and totally failing the State of Texas in either of the federal government’s mandatory legal and Constitutional obligation to protect the state from invasion or from violence.

What does this have to do with civil war?

Since the utter failure of the US government to protect the citizens of Texas from invasion and the horrific criminal activity (violence) including rape, murder, theft, property destruction at the hands of foreign invaders…the Texas Governor took his fully legal steps to protect his state and its citizens in March of 2021. This legal move of the governor was after decades of his citizens suffering due to the federal government’s lack of performing its Constitutional duty.

Well, yesterday SCOTUS just brought us to the brink of civil war.

What did SCOTUS do? They ruled that it is perfectly legal for the US federal government to not fulfill its mandatory Constitutional duty…AND that the State of Texas is NOT allowed to protect its own citizens from invasion and other criminal activity in dealing with the southern border.

SCOTUS is made up of 9 members, including 8 Associate Justices and 1 Chief Justice. They are:

The “Originalists”-

• Clarence Thomas
• Samuel Alito
• Neil Gorsuch
• Brett Kavanaugh

The radical leftists:

• Sonia Sotomayor
• Elena Kagan
• Ketanji Brown Jackson

Then there is Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett. Roberts is commonly well-know to be

Chief Justice Roberts and his buddy Obama having a bonding moment.

bi-polar in judicial matters. From what I can tell he is little more than a puppet swaying whichever way his puppet-masters pull him. Barrett on the other hand is commonly viewed as ‘conservative’ for the most part. There is some debate in this matter and some questions exist relating to her rulings in favor of defendants accused of sex crimes.

So obviously the radical leftists ruled in favor of continuing the invasion of, and the overthrow of the US by, illegal immigrants into the State of Texas…including murderers, drug dealers, rapists, child traffickers for the sex trade, and all manner of other criminals. The originalist Justices all ruled to allow Texans to protect their state’s citizens. Roberts, in an unsurprising move, sided with radical leftists. Oddly, Barrett did as well.

Chief Justice Roberts and his boss Bush.

Roberts did as he was told…he is a mere puppet controlled by the oligarch Bush family. But one has to ask why did Barrett sided with the radical leftists. But, it doesn’t really matter why.

Herein is the problem…

1. The US federal government is failing to fulfill its mandatory Constitutional responsibility.
2. The Governor of Texas, Greg Abbott, is legally fulfilling his responsibility to protect the State of Texas.
3. The Biden Administration is hell-bent on bringing millions and millions of illegal aliens into the US while he is President.
4. Both Biden and Abbott are strong personalities and I don’t see either of them backing down easily.

Texans guarding Texas and the US when US Border Patrol won’t!

So what happens next in Eagle’s Pass, Texas when the clown show of Border Patrol shows up to exert their new-found Supreme Court authority to destroy Texas and the US? Yeah, see Texas has deployed their state military to defend the border with Mexico and stop the invasion…because US Border Patrol either refuses to do their job of is so utterly incompetent that they can’t do their job.

So now you have heavily armed personnel on both sides, one side wishes to protect their state and the US…the other side is enforcing the Presidential mandate to destroy America with illegal immigration. What happens next?

But there is another aspect of this…’bubba’. Yeah, the old ‘Bubba Effect’ comes into play. I lived in Texas for quite awhile and I have a little knowledge of those folks. You gotta go back to history…Texas beat Mexico in a war in the 19^th century when the US would not help…and Texas gained their independence from results of that war. And Texans are some of the best armed folks in the US.

So here…what would you do? You have criminals, rapists, human traffickers, drug dealers, murders, perverts and the like breaking into your home raping your wife then killing her, raping your 8-year old daughter, kidnapping your teenage daughters, killing your sons…what would you do?

Of course, you would do the right thing…your God-given right to defend yourself and your family…YOU STOP THE CRIMINALS!

Now you have two opposing sides of heavily armed men…good vs evil…Texas military vs Border Patrol…now, off in the shadows you have thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of Texans wanting to protect their homes and families.

But it is worse…you also have the Mexican Cartels wanting to protect their criminal enterprises. What are they going to do?

And let us not forget the pervert, mentally incapacitated, head of the Biden Crime Family who commands the US military and a whole army of federal law enforcement thugs.

This situation could fade away into obscurity…allowing the continued invasion and overthrow of the United States…no doubt about it. The US Border Patrol resumes its concierge services for criminal illegal aliens and the Mexican Cartels. The Texas fathers and husbands could tuck their tails and allow their families to continue to live at the mercy of criminals and cartel thugs.

Or…the Texans could stand up for their God-given right to protect their homes and families. But, do you think Biden would stand for someone actually doing something right and honorable…men showing actual courage and character? Of course not! That runs contrary to everything Biden is and has been his whole life.

And if a single shot is fired…do you think all these well-armed Texas citizens will stand-by and watch their military friends and neighbors be fired upon by the dolts in Border Patrol, the FBI, ATF, or any other federal thugs?

A civil war could start right there in Eagle’s Pass…and it could start soon, very soon. All it takes is one Bubba, one clown, or one criminal to fire the first shot. And the US federal government is full of clowns and criminals.

Then again…maybe the Texans do have the strength of character, the principles, and the courage to stand up to the criminals south of the border, the ones crossing the border…and the criminals north of Richmond. We’ll see.

Pray for divine intervention…pray for peace and for right to prevail…

I wonder if leftist members of SCOTUS and their co-conspirators know exactly what they are doing…throwing a match into a puddle of gas? < click here to read “>>>WARNING – Feds Expecting/Wanting Violence…” >

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

When writing about a specific and focused topic such as ‘power’ I like to make sure the definition is clear and concise before anything else. I knew where I wanted to go with this subject when laying out the groundwork for this article. I knew exactly what I wanted to accomplish. But finding a consensus on the official meaning/definition of ‘power’ just isn’t out there in full agreement by the experts. So, I am going to combine 3 different definitions from 3 trusted sources to get us all on the same page.

Power: the belief that an entity possesses the authority to influence, control, or produce an effect. Further, a specific power can only reside in, or with, one entity at a time; and, it can shift between or among various entities for a virtually endless number of reasons.

Here is the problem…the conflict that arises when two opposing entities try to possess the same exact power.

A parent-child relationship is a good example of power…especially when dealing with teenagers. Let’s take a 16-year old with a new drivers license. That child wants to drive the parent’s car, the drivers license gives that child the power/authority to drive. But, the car belongs to the parent, therefore the power/authority to use the car belongs to the parent. However, the child believes that the power of the license they possess overrides the parent’s power to control the car usage. When the parent says ‘no’ to the child wanting to use the car, the conflict usually ends up with the child telling the parent they aren’t being fair. That ‘fairness’ argument is a point to remember.

On a larger scale there is, and always has been, an ongoing power struggle between governments and citizens. When a conflict arises governments usually solve the problem fairly easily and quickly…they send in lots of armed men to convince the citizens to comply with the government’s exercise of power. Should the citizens continue to resist being convinced…the armed men simply imprison or kill the non-compliant citizens. This style of conflict resolution has been the gold standard for a very long time…as in thousands and thousands of years. Overwhelmingly governments have won those conflicts; however, there were exceptions.

One notable exception was the American Revolution where a bunch of ragtag militias grouped together to militarily and politically defeat an empire with the largest and most powerful army and navy in the world at the time. As a result of that defeat of a large and powerful tyrannical government…there was a paradigm shift in the entire world. Not exclusively in terms of the military victory, although it was fairly unique, it was more a paradigm shift in political terms.

For the first time…citizens felt empowered to actually control and run the government themselves…that governmental power actually came from them, the citizens.

The Founding Fathers of the United States of America not simply understood the whole principle of ‘power’, they were also clearly rooted in the origination of that power. But it went further than that…they had a clarity in the appropriate function of government. All of that manifested itself in the Declaration of Independence (DOI).

• The origin of power: “…to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them…” and “…

they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights…”

• The rights of citizens: “…among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness…”

• The role of government: “…to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…”

• The owners of governmental power: “…deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…”

For the first time in the history of man the Founders acknowledged that rights are given to mankind from God, and those rights override any governmental power. To understand just what that means you have to fully comprehend the meaning of ‘unalienable’. Unalienable means impossible to take away or give up, not capable of being taken away or denied.

Exactly what are those unalienable rights? The DOI gives us a general idea; 1) life, 2) liberty, and 3) the pursuit of happiness. Originally #3 was written as ‘property’, which is vitally important to know…the context if you will. But Jefferson changed it at the last minute to be far more sweeping in context. It’s not hard to understand what the Founders had in mind, it is well documented through many volumes of their writings should you want to learn more.

The right to life was pretty clear in that it meant that citizens had a right to not have their life taken for trivial purposes. For a government to take a life it must be through a legal process where the person was assumed to be innocent until, in a court of law with due process by a jury of their peers, the accused had to be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. It also meant we have a right to defend ourselves (self-defense) and our property (Castle Doctrine)…even to taking another’s life (the offender/culprit) while exercising those two rights. And notice there is no verbiage stating restrictions on who we can protect our life and property from.

The right to liberty was just as clear; meaning a person’s liberty could not be taken or restricted without just cause. A just cause for example would be proving a person guilty of murder in a court of law via due process by a jury of the person’s peers, beyond a reasonable doubt. A person’s liberty was sacrosanct and it was to be treated as such by government.

The right to property was originally used due to the British Crown, and their lower officials, being able to seize a person’s property virtually at will, or restricting permission for which a person’s property could be used. Property ownership, and the independent use thereof, was of paramount importance to Colonists, and a fairly new concept in the world at the time.

The last minute change to the right of happiness was another term that the Founders were clear on. It meant the right to live a life free of governmental interference, or governmental restrictions on a citizen’s rights, freedoms, and liberties. To understand the full significance of this concept you would have to fully digest the Constitution and Bill of Rights…and the extreme restrictions that the Founders placed on government. And the Founder’s use of good and sound reasoning in doing so…experience.

Now it gets interesting…these rights do not come from the government. These rights are not capable of being taken away or denied by government.

Why? Because they come from God. Meaning that God is above government in the power chain of command; solidifying the concept/principle that governmental power is subservient to God’s power.

That last two principles laid out in the DOI are extremely important.

First, governments are established for a singular purpose…to protect these rights -period!!!- “…to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men…”.

There is zero ambiguity there!

Lastly, and here is the crux of it all, the only power that the government possesses comes from its citizens who consent to it.

Governments cannot take power from, or deny/restrict the power of, its citizens. But there is more. The DOI phrase is “…deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…”. Notice the term ‘just’ in there?

One again, words have meaning, intentions, and consequence. The word ‘just’ is defined as “morally upright, good, and being legally correct.” This added protective layer for and of citizens is there for a reason. The government can’t take any ‘power’ from its citizens, even if the citizens agree to it, unless the reasoning to take that power is morally upright, good, and legally correct in and of itself.

For instance…the government cannot assume the power to kill (i.e. euthanize) a person for being a certain color, race, deformity, religion, age, origin, or for convenience. Why? Because none of those reasons are not morally upright, good, or legally correct. Ah, but you say the people have agreed to it (given consent) and therefore believe those reasoning’s to be perfectly acceptable.

Nice try…but where do the powers of the citizens come from? Yup, God…as per the Founders and the authors of the founding principles. So the question must be posed…Would God authorize those reasons to murder/euthanize/abort people?

The answer is simple and plain…No!

Oh…you don’t believe in God?

So what! That doesn’t matter…it absolutely matters not if you believe in God or not. Our Founders did know God and did know He is the source of people’s power and rights…and they documented it. And that my friend in the underpinning of our country, our power, our rights, our freedoms, our liberty and the intended restrictions on government…God.

Now, herein lies the problem…people losing their belief in God…whether willingly, by design, or by coercion. What happens when the protective top layer of “God” is removed from the power equation?

Well then, the ultimate power then lies solely with the people and the ‘unalienable’ part goes away because government can now exercise unrestricted force over their citizens and thus subjugated them. Once that is done…the all power lies with the government through the force of arms. And that takes us right back to the Colonial days of America.

What does that mean to us in today’s world?

Well my friend…we are right back there in Colonial America. The government, through legislation and the Supreme Court, has stripped almost all vestiges of God from not just government, but public life in general. And yes, there are even governmental controls and restrictions on churches and religion in this day and age. And this is thanks to both Democrats and Republicans…the utter evil of politicians and a compliant populace.

No longer does the US federal government understand its power comes from the consent of the governed whose power originates with God. The federal government simply takes power from citizens pretty much at will. The federal government, and all levels of government, now dictate what life is, what liberties you have, and how you can pursue happiness.

Doubt me? Try this…build a house without the permission, inspections, and approval of government…how’s that going to work out for you?

Or maybe this would be a good test…try keeping all of the money you earn, and then spend it as you see right and moral. How’s that one going to come out for you? Hell, in some states you can’t even legally catch the rainwater coming off your roof and store it in a barrel to water your garden with.

But here are the two biggest tests for you…compare what the federal government does today against the immense and clearly defined restrictions on government found in the US Constitution. Finally, compare the actions of any/all levels of government against the Bill of Rights. And just for the heck of it, test it with this…compare all levels of government, even your HOA, against the Declaration of Independence.

Whoa!!! Yeah, I know I am a radical, I admit it. I believe, firmly believe, in adhering to the principles and concepts outlined in America’s founding documents, especially the Declaration of Independence. I also have faith that the Founders knew what they were doing when they penned the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

I also believe, unquestionably so, that the United States federal government…along with all levels of government in the United States, have strayed from those documents, principles, concepts, and underlying foundation of rights, liberties, and freedoms. To me it is plain and clear to see. As it should be.

So two final questions; 1) why did we stray?, 2) how do we get back?

#1 – The answer is simple…the lust for money and power by people is the ‘why’ we strayed.

#2 – Returning to the founding principles and concepts, the very foundation of America, is simple as well for the ‘get back’ part:

• We one again realize that God is at the top of the power food chain and restore God to His rightful place,
• We abandon all of the corrupt crap that all levels off government have layered on us,
• We restore the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the only documents that run our governments,
• We fully embrace and practice all precepts and principles in the Declaration of Independence.

Can #2 happen? Of course not. It has all gone too far.Unfortunate to be sure, but reality all the same. To think otherwise is to be unrealistic, fanciful.

Our government has assumed the power of, and replaced, God. In so doing, government ignores that the government’s source of power comes from God through us, the US citizens. The US federal government has assumed the role of God over the United States, therefore they assume the role of ultimate power. A role they are NOT entitled to. No one ever gave them that power at any point in time, ever.

US citizens could try to exercise their proper role/right/power of government ownership, “…deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed…”. People could take to heart the Declaration’s “…the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government…”. It could happen, but not realistically.

If US citizens did try to fulfill their God-given role…then the US federal government, most (if not all) state governments, almost all local governments, virtually every law enforcement officer would declare war on those citizens. Declaring them to be domestic terrorists and war would be the order of the day…which DHS has set the groundwork for. The resulting war/massacre would be bloody, hateful, horrendous, destructive, and almost unimaginable to the average person.

Tragically, read what the the definitions of ‘domestic terrorist’ is now according to various federal law enforcement agencies, especially DHS. It shouldn’t just disturb you…it should scare the hell out of you. Well, only if you believe in our country’s founding principles and concepts.

When the dust would settle from that conflict of government vs patriots (i.e. US citizens)…the end result would be a US totalitarian/authoritarian state with no Constitution, no Bill of Rights, no liberty, no freedom…other than the measly crumbs that government would allow to fall from their table.

Remember the warnings President Biden gave to US citizens…you come against us with AR-15’s…we will send F-15’s. He meant it…that is exactly what the government would do…and it would come from all levels of government, from the military, from law enforcement, from every federal agency. It would be unimaginable total war…bloodshed of unimaginable proportions.

Have you ever considered that is exactly why the Founding Fathers didn’t authorize a standing army in the Constitution? They were vehemently opposed to a standing army for a good reason…weren’t they? They knew…they knew.

Hang on a second, consider this…maybe the actions of what we are seeing on all levels of government in the country today is exactly that…their desire for that exact endgame. It could well be exactly their plan to gain that outcome…a totalitarian/authoritarian state of which I spoke. It sure would make their job easier…especially if we understood more of what exactly their ‘job’ is.

Remember this…

1. Power can only reside in one place at a time.
2. If one entity gains any power, it is at the expense of another entity losing that power.
3. God gave us certain power (unalienable rights) for a reason.
4. And then…what if Thomas Jefferson was right all along about the ‘tree of liberty’?

Maybe…if we organized well enough, tried hard enough, and prayed sincerely enough…

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.

Let me paint a couple of dots for you…

When Iraq was a strong country it was almost always at war with Iran…1980’s – 2000. That almost continual warfare kept Iran in-check in the Middle East because they were busy fighting Iraq. Iran has been an enemy of the United States since 1979 when Iran had a revolution, overthrew the Shaw (US puppet), seized the US embassy, and took Americans hostages.

In 2001 the United States invaded Afghanistan and started a decades long war with them…that we lost. During our Biden-ordered retreat in 2021 we left billions and billions of dollars of military equipment in that country…some of which was high-tech and sophisticated. Afghanistan is now in the grips of a radical Islamic, terrorist sponsoring, government. For the record…it was the significant backing of Iran that enabled Afghanistan to defeat the US.

In 2003 the United States invaded Iraq and started a 17-year long war with them…that we lost. Lost? Yes, we won militarily but the Islamic government that shortly thereafter came into power kicked out US troops in 2020. We lost…because we overthrew a dictator just to have a radical Islamic government take over. But their current military is of no consequence and no challenge to Iran at all.

Moving on…

In 2015 the US brokered a deal with Iran ensuring that they can acquire a nuclear arsenal…Obama’s deal.

In 2016 Obama sent a total of $1.7billion to Iran in 3 plane loads of cash.

In 2018 Trump stops the Iranian nuclear deal…and sets barricades into place to stop Iran from acquiring a nuclear arsenal.

In 2022 Biden (Obama’s puppet) restores the Iranian nuclear deal ensuring that Iran acquires a nuclear arsenal.

In 2023 Biden releases billions and billions of dollars to Iran.

In 2023 (the month after Biden releases billions of dollars to Iran) Muslim terrorists invaded southern Israel slaughtering, raping, murdering, and burning alive men, women, children, and babies. Another group of Muslim terrorists began attacking northern Israel with rockets and drones. Another group of Muslim terrorists began attacking Israeli and US ships in the Red Sea.

So here is what I find interesting…

All the terrorists that attacked Israel in 2023, and still are attacking them, are funded, trained, and armed by Iran.

Video of the Hamas terrorists who invaded southern Israel 2023 are seen with the exact same weaponry that we left behind in Afghanistan.

Does anyone else find a connection? Or, do you think this is mere coincidence?

Let me throw this at you…

In 2014 Biden made some very anti-Semitic statements. Finally apologizing after immense and justifiable outrage surface against him.

In 2020 Biden supported some very anti-Semitic statements by Democrats, including Black Lives Matter personnel.

Obama, Biden’s boss for 8 years, made no attempt to conceal his disdain (some called it ‘hatred’) for Israel before and during his presidency.

Here are my last questions if you are interested…

Why did a Republican President Bush invade and start a war with a country, Afghanistan, laying the groundwork for eventually leaving them far more quantity and quality of military weaponry?

Why did a Republican President Bush invade and start a war with the only country, Iraq, keeping Iran in-check when the entire world knew that Iran was the mortal enemy to the United States and Israel?

Why did a Democrat President Obama strike a deal with Iran ensuring that Iran, the sworn enemy of the US and Israel, can acquire a nuclear arsenal?

Why did Democrat President Obama send billions and billions of dollars to Iran, the sworn enemy of the US and Israel?

Why did Democrat President Biden reinstate the Iranian nuclear deal, once again ensuring that Iran, the sworn enemy of the US and Israel, acquires a nuclear arsenal?

Why did Democrat President Biden release billions and billions of dollars to Iran…the sworn enemy of the US and Israel?

More importantly…What comes next for the US and Israel and how soon?

And just for kicks…Why do you think that both Republican and Democrat controlled Congresses and Presidents made sure all of this happened?

Finally…Am I the only one who sees these dots as connected…and who is a bit concerned about it?

Just for the heck of it…don’t you just love seeing folks getting along like long lost lovers???

P.S. Anyone else thinking about the huge numbers of military aged men coming across the southern border…that are from the Middle East…from countries and a religion that hate us?

 2009 - 2024 Copyright © AHTrimble.com ~ All rights reserved
No reproduction or other use of this content 
without expressed written permission from AHTrimble.com
No legal, economic, or financial advice is given, no expertise to be assumed.
See Content Use Policy for more information.